Remedies- Restitutionary Damages Flashcards
1
Q
Restitutionary Damages (Legal)
A
Legal damages
1. based on the idea that ∆ should not get unjust enrichment
2
Q
Restitutionary Damages vs. Compensatory Damages
A
- damages based on value of benefit to defendant
i. vs. compensatory damages
a. compensatory looks at what π needs to be made whole
b. restitutionary looks at how much ∆ was made better - bar: three possible fact patterns
i. one: only compensatory damages available
a. plaintiff injured, ∆ not benefitted
b. ex. car accident, remedy is cost of injury
ii. two: only restitutionary damages available
a. plaintiff not injured, ∆ windfall
b. ex. ∆ trespasses to save money, remedy is money saved by trespass
iii. three: both compensatory and restitutionary damages available (most common)
a. plaintiff injured, and ∆ windfall
b. ex. ∆ steals π’s machine for use in ∆’s own business
c. on bar: write about both compensatory and restitutionary damages, but plaintiff can only recover the larger sum - note: punitive damages can be attached to restitutionary damages in tort
3
Q
Replevin
A
- replevin: π recovers possession of personal property (chattel)
i. pre-trial remedy
ii. executed by sheriff
4
Q
When does replevin apply
A
i. π’ has right to possession and
ii. wrongful withholding by ∆
5
Q
When / how to use repleving?
A
- Allowed to recover chattel before the trial. To do so must:
i. prima facie case (right to possession + wrongful withholding)
ii. bond posted (money to compensate if the π is wrong) - redelivery bond defense
i. ∆ can defeat the replevin (immediate recovery) by posting a redelivery bond
ii. allows ∆ to keep the chattel until after the trial - replevin usually coupled with compensatory or restitutionary damages (for loss of use or benefit to ∆) during time of detention
i. bar: talk about all possible remedies (compensatory + restitutionary + ejectment)
6
Q
Ejectment
A
- equivalent for replevin for real property
i. pre-trial remedy executed by sheriff
ii. must be π’s right to possession and wrongful withholding by ∆ - note: ejectment only occurs if ∆ has possession
i. no ejectment for trespass (ex. ∆ crossing π’s lawn every day)
ii. ejectment available for adverse possessors and holdover tenants - ejectment also coupled with compensatory or restitutionary damages
i. bar: talk about all possible remedies