Remedies for Breach Flashcards

1
Q

Rescission

A

Terminating the contract because of a breach of a “matter of vital importance - I mean a matter touching the very existence of the contract” - Lord Maclaren (Collard v Carswell)
Valid when; Defective Performance, Late Performance, Refusal to Perform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Wade v Waldon

A

Rescission.
Wade, a comedian, had a contract with Waldon to perform two shows in Glasgow to which he had to confirm 14 days prior and would receive advertising materials. Wade failed to do this therefore Waldon sought to terminate the contract on breach. Wade then sued Waldon for breach as he had not received advertisements.
Held - There was not a material breach as it did not affect the performance itself which was the purpose of the contract. Rescission was not justified therefore Wade was entitled to damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Defective sub-standard performance

Lindley Catering v Hibernian Football Club

A

Rescission
LC entered into a 5 year contract with HFC. 2 years in, HFC terminated the contract due to complaints of poor performance.
Held - LC were in breach but rescission was not justified as they had not been given time to rectify their service. LC were entitled to £7000 damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Late Performance

Rodger (builders) Ltd v Fawdry

A

Rescission
It was held that not paying for heritable property (land/buildings) on the due date was not a ground for rescission.
The Ultimate Procedure can be used to determine how late performance can be if it is not stated in the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Contract Clause - Late Performance

Bell Bros v Aitken

A

Rescission
Hire of motor cars. The contract included a clause which stated that if there was a breach of contract then the hirer would have to pay liquidate damages which equalled the value of the car when they first begun the hire.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Retention

A

If A is in breach then B is allowed to withhold their performance providing that the obligations are interdependent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Inveresk Plc v Tullis Russell Papermakers Ltd

A

Retention
I sold a brand of paper to T and agreed to continue the manufacture, distribute and selling of the paper for a period after the sale. There was a dispute about payment from each of the party so T did not pay. The court had to decide whether the obligations were interdependent.
Held - One obligation of a party is equal to all obligations of the other party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Special Lien

A

Retention
A party can retain possessions which it took in order to perform on it. The party in possession can retain the thing until the other party has performed its obligation.
E.g. - A car garage can keep the car until the other party pays.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

General Lien

A

Retention
Certain relationships only.
Property can be kept for all debts owned whether it relates to the property being retained or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Financial Loses - Calculation of Damages

Grant v Ullah

A

Financial Loses
They were selling their house to a buyer which one week later pulled out. The house was then sold 4 months later for a lesser price.
Held - They received damages for the difference between the prices of the first and second sale.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Financial Loses - Calculation of Damages

Methods

A

Methods of calculating financial loses
Cost of Curing - how much it cost to fix something as a result of the breach
Difference in Value - how much money was lost a result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Non-Financial Loses

Solatium

A

Damages for pain or suffering (including delayed flights)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Addis v Gramophone

A

Solatium
A was fired and claimed that it was embarrassing and sought damages for distress/upset.
Held - The court said that it was not a valid claim therefore damages are not typically given for distress/injured feelings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Dieson v Samson

A

Solatium
Wedding photographer forgot to turn up to the wedding. There was no financial loss but it caused great upset and distress on the day so the couple were awarded £80.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Farley v Skinner

A

Solatium
F bought a house near the airport and asked the surveyor if there would be much noise as he would like like a quiet home. When he moved there was a lot of noise.
Held - F received £10000 for his loss of pleasure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Damages for Non-Financial

Douglas v Glenverigill

A

Trouble and Inconvenience

Pursuers got £500 for the inconvenience of having to travel back to the car garage.

17
Q

Nominal Damages

A

Should still be awarded even if there is no financial or non-financial loses.
A small token/very small sum of money

18
Q

Factors which limit the damages

A

Causation (“but for”), Remoteness of loss, Mitigation, Contributory Negligence.

19
Q

Remoteness of Loss

example

A

You order a taxi to go to the airport but the taxi doesn’t show up so you miss the flight. It is fair to expect the taxi company to pay for another flight.
If you were a professional tennis player and had a match which you were going to be paid £1million for, it would still be reasonable to get the taxi firm to cover those losses too.

20
Q

Hadley v Baxendale

A

“either arising naturally according to the usual course of things or from the breach itself OR may reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of both parties”
Usual - not too remote
Special circumstances - too remote unless both parties knew about it.

21
Q

Balfour Beatty v Scottish Power

A

Remoteness of Loss
BB were making a concrete aqueduct and contracted with SP for them to supply electricity. There was distribution with the power which meant that BB had to restart. BB sued SP for damages but SP argued it was too remote.
Held - Businesses are not expected to know the details of another’s business. Too remote.

22
Q

Mitigiation

A

Losses which were avoidable are usually not recoverable.

23
Q

Connal, Connal and Co v Fisher Renwick and Co

A

FR agreed to ship goods to Canada for $27 but then were unable to. Due to the season they could not find another direct shipping so had to pay $118 for an indirect ship. They sued FR for the difference.
Held - It relied on the defenders to prove if there was a cheaper way.

24
Q

Liquidate Damage Clause

A

A clause in the contract which specifies how the damages may be calculated. However, the courts do not have to follow it is it does not seem fair/like a punishment.
ParkingEye v Beavis is a relevant case.

25
Q

Specific Implement

Retail Park Investments Ltd v RBS

A

Action for Performance
RBS had a store in a shopping centre. It was in the contract that the store had to be kept open. The bank wanted to just put in an ATM instead. Landlord sought a specific implement.
Held - There was no reason why RBS should not continue to remain open as they entered into the lease knowing the conditions.