REMEDIES AND DEFENCES Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the aim of damages ?

A

The aim of damages is to put the claimant back into the position they were in before the tort was committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define Pecuinary losses

A

Losses that can be easily calculated in moneytary terms
examples; cost of hire car, damaged property, fares getting to and fro from the hospital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Non Pecuinary losses

A

Losses which arae not wholly money based and they are difficult to quantify
examples; pain and suffering caused by injury, loss of amenity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Special damages

A

Special damages are amount which can be calculated specifically up to the date of the court hearing
example; vehicle repairs,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define General damages

A

General damages are amounts for non pecuinary losses, lookiing forward from the date of court hearing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Lump sum

A

These are claims focused onpain and suffering and loss of amenity. This is a one off payment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Defiine Structured settlement

A

This is a per month, or per year payment for a life time or specific time period.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain Mitigation of loss with a case example

A

If there is a duty to mitigate loss, claimant must act reasonably and minimise cost for the defendant otherwise they would not be able to claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define contributory Negligence

A

This is defined in the Law Reform Act 19455 as a partial defence when C is partly to take blame for their injuries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the three element to contributory negligence

A

Failure to take care ( Sayers V Harlow UDC 1958)
Contributing to harm ( O’Connell V Jackson)
100% reduction in damages ( James V IMI Kynoch)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly