Remedies Flashcards

1
Q

Livingston v Raywards Coal Co

A

Purpose of compensatory damages (CD): put C in the same position he would have been had the tort not been committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Baker v Willoughby

A

CD: D ran with a car to C and damaged his leg (tort1), then someone shot C in the same leg and it had to be amputated (tort2), D liable as for both injuries, D liable for the loss of amenity and lower earning capacity even after the amputation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Jobling v Associated dairies

A

CD: C slipped on floor at work and harmed his back, then developed independent back injury; Distinguished Baker v Willoughby (almost overruled it). Vicissitudes of life, D pay damages before illness of back developed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Vicissitude of life

A

Change of circumstances or fortune

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Pickett v British Ral Engineering

A

CD: loss of earnings consequent upon anticipated premature death; dependants were able to recover - ‘lost years” to be taken into account, provided not too remote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Parry v Cleaver

A

CD: Wrongdoer has to pay full damages even if the claimant obtained a pension, D should not benefit from C providing for his own misfortune

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

West v Shephard

A

CD: Non-Financial Loss
- Pain and suffering – subjectively assessed
C unconscious, unaware of pain. “Damages awarded not to punish the wrongdoer but to compensate the person injured”
- Loss of amenity – objectively assessed C need not be unhappy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rookes v Barnard

A

Exemplary damages (ED): D pressured employer into dismissing C (union, strike). ED where:
1. Oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional action by the
servants of the government
2. D’s conduct calculated to make a profit > compensation
payable (cynical calculation + disregard for the law)
3. Authorised by statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cassel v Broome

A

ED: D published a book he knew was libellous; D having calculated that they would receive more from extra sales than they might have to pay in damages, it was open to the court to award ED; amount of ED up to court’s discretion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicester

A

ED for police officer, applicable for public authorities as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lumba

A

Nominal damages; (falsely imprisoned, would have been detained anyway). You can’t be compensated for a loss you haven’t suffered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Grobbelaar v NGN

A

Defamation, football player taking bribes. Contemptuous damages (= minimal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hicks

A

Two girls died in accident, family sued for the fear they have suffered before the death; Estate of the dead can recover for both £ and non-£ losses (pain, suffering)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Franklin v SER

A

Dependants can only sue for £ losses, not injury to feelings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Jaggard v Sawyer

A

C wanted damages instead of injunction, D has trespassed his land by a new building making use of a private right of way; injunction would be oppressive
1. C must establish a claim in equity + overcome equitable
defences
2. Prima facie entitled to injunction, but it’s discretionary
+ Eg of damages in lieu of injunction (trivial interference)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Spycatcher

A

“Equity will not act in vain”

Attorney General sought injunction for book already published worldwide.

17
Q

Measure Bros Ltd v Measure

A

“He who comes into equity must come with clean hands” K clause that C wouldn’t work for 7y. Company failed, still sought to enforce it.

18
Q

Miller v Jackson

A

No injunction to prevent desirable activities, in public interest. “In summertime village cricket is the delight of everyone”
+ Damages in lieu

19
Q

American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon

A

Patent case; Interim injunction. “The court must (…) determine where the ‘balance of convenience’ lies”; if damages appropriate, then damages

20
Q

Shelfer v City of London Electric Co

A

Structural damage to house + nuisance; injunction granted
Damages in lieu granted if:
- Injury to C’s right is small, can be estimated in £
- Pecuniary compensation is adequate
- Injunction would be oppressive to D
+ Concern that right to break law not available for purchase

21
Q

Coventry v Lawrence

A

Injunction: “matter of discretion which should not be fettered” = Primary remedy for nuisance. D must show why shouldn’t be granted. Shelfer test not to be applied mechanically, discretion.

22
Q

Coventry v L 2

A

Bungalow had burned down.

  • D can come back to court to demand injunction be lifted
  • Injunction should be lifted if it is no longer necessary