Remedies Flashcards
Contracts: Available Legal Remedies
Contracts - High
- The following legal remedies are available for contract breaches: (1) expectation damages (compensatory damages); (2) reliance damages; (3) consequential damages; (4) incidental damages; and (5) restitution damages.
- Punitive damages are generally NOT available in a breach of contract action, but may be awarded in a contract action involving corresponding tort claims that allow such damages.
Expectation Damages
Contracts - High
- The general measure of damages for a breach of contract are expectation damages. Expectation damages arise directly from the breach, and are an attempt to put the non-breaching party in the same position it would have been in but for the breach. To recover, the damages must be: (1) caused by the defendant (actual cause); (2) foreseeable (proximate cause); (3) certain (damages cannot be speculative); AND (4) unavoidable (the plaintiff must take reasonable steps to mitigate his losses). An award of damages must account and deduct for any costs the injured party avoided because of the breach.
Reliance Damages
Contracts - High
- Reliance damages are generally the expenditures made by a party in reliance of a contract, and are an attempt to put the non-breaching party in the position it would have been if the contract never existed.
- Reliance damages are available when: (1) a plaintiff acted in reliance on the defendant’s agreement to perform under a contract; AND (2) the plaintiff’s reliance was foreseeable. If expectation damages are too speculative, the court may award reliance damages instead.
Consequential Damages
Contracts - High
- Consequential damages arise indirectly from the breach, and are awarded because of the injured party’s special circumstances (e.g. lost profits).
- To recover, the damages MUST be: (1) reasonably foreseeable at the time of contract formation; (2) arise from the plaintiff’s special circumstances that the defendant knew or had reason to know of; AND (3) reasonably certain (the damages cannot be speculative).
- An award of damages must account for and deduct for any costs the injured party avoided because of the breach.
- Consequential damages MAY be limited or excluded by agreement unless the limitation/exclusion is unconscionable.
Incidental Damages
Contracts - High
- Incidental damages are the reasonable costs incurred as a result of a breach of contract (i.e. costs of returning nonconforming goods or caring/storing non-conforming goods).
Restitution Damages
Contracts - High
- Restitution (also referred to as unjust enrichment or quantum meruit) is awarded to prevent unjust enrichment, and is available when one party confers a benefit onto another party (even if there is no enforceable contract). Damages will be awarded based on the value of the benefit conferred upon the defendant. A party CANNOT recover both expectation and restitution damages.
Liquidated Damages
Contracts - Low
- Liquidated damages will be enforced if: (1) the amount of damages is difficult to estimate at the time the contract was formed; AND (2) the amount is reasonable to the actual damages suffered.
- If the liquidated damages clause is valid, then only that amount is valid. If invalid, then actual damages are available.
Employment Contracts
Contracts
Compensatory
Reliance
Mitigation
Specific Performance
Recission and Restitution
Injunction
Personal Property Contracts
Contracts
Compensatory
Reliance
Injunction
Specific Performance
Replevin
Restitution
Land Contracts
Contracts
Compensatory
Specific Performance
Recission and Restitution
Reformation
Injunction
Financial Harm
Contracts
Compensatory
Punitive
Reformation
Recission
Replevin
Restitution
Constructive Trust/Equitable Lien
UCC Buyer’s Remedies & Damages
Contracts - High
- Under the UCC, a buyer who (a) never received the goods – the seller repudiates or fails to make delivery, (b) rightfully rejected non-conforming goods, OR (c) justifiably revoked acceptance of the goods MAY: (1) cancel the contract; (2) recover any amount paid (a refund) – even if buyer doesn’t cancel the contract; (3) recover either Cover Damages or Market Damages; AND (4) recover Incidental and Consequential damages.
- If the buyer keeps the non-conforming goods, then the buyer is entitled to Loss in-Value Damages – measured by the difference between the value as promised and the value of the non-conforming goods.
- Cover Damages are the difference between the contract price and the price of substitute goods. This is used as the measure of damages if the buyer covered in good faith.
- Market Damages are used if the buyer did not cover in good faith or did not cover at all, and are the difference between the market price (at the time when buyer learned of the breach) and the contract price. Market price is determined as of (a) the place for tender, or (b) the place of arrival in cases of rejection after arrival or revocation of acceptance.
UCC Seller’s Remedies & Damages
Contracts - Medium
- Seller’s Remedies: Under Article 2 of the UCC, when a buyer breaches a contract for the sale of goods, the seller has the following remedies: (a) withhold delivery of the goods; (b) cancel; (c) recover cover damages (the difference
between the resale price and the contract price of the goods), used if the resale was made in good faith and a commercially reasonable manner; (d) recover market damages (the difference between the market price at the time and place for tender); (e) recover lost profits if the seller is a lost volume seller (a seller who regularly engages in the sale of the goods at issue and has unlimited inventory); (f) stop delivery of goods in the possession of a carrier or bailee when he discovers the buyer to be insolvent; (g) stop delivery of carload, truckload, planeload, or larger shipments of goods when the buyer breaches; OR (h) replevy identified goods in certain instances when the buyer is insolvent. - Incidental Damages: A seller is also entitled to recover incidental damages, which include any commercially reasonable costs incurred resulting from the breach.
- Seller’s Right to Replevy Identified Goods: Under Article 2 of the UCC, an unpaid seller generally has no right to repossess (replevy) goods that he sent to a buyer. However, a seller of goods may repossess the goods he sent to a buyer if: (1) the buyer was insolvent when it received the goods; and (2) the seller makes a demand within 10 days after the buyer received the goods. HOWEVER, if a misrepresentation of solvency had been made to the seller in writing within three months prior to the delivery of the goods, the 10-day limitation to make a demand no longer applies.
UCC Contractual Modification or Limitation of Remedy
Contracts - Low
- An agreement between the parties MAY provide for remedies in addition to OR in substitution for those provided under the UCC.
- The additional/substituted remedies MAY limit or alter the measure of damages recoverable, such as limiting a buyer’s remedies to return of the goods, repayment of the purchase price, or to repair and replacement of non-conforming goods/parts.
- Optional If Not Exclusive: A remedy provided under a contract is optional UNLESS the remedy is expressly agreed to be exclusive, in which case it’s the sole remedy.
- Remedy Fails to Achieve its Essential Purpose: If circumstances cause an exclusive/limited remedy to fail of its essential purpose, then a party may pursue any remedies available under the UCC.
- Consequential Damages: Consequential damages MAY be limited or excluded UNLESS the limitation/exclusion is unconscionable. It’s prima facie unconscionable to limit consequential damages for personal injury concerning consumer goods.
Unjust Enrichment (Quasi-Contract)
Contracts - High
- A quasi-contract is a contract implied by law, and is used to prevent the unjust enrichment of the defendant. A quasicontract will be created if: (1) the plaintiff confers a benefit upon the defendant; (2) the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation he would be compensated for the benefit; (3) the defendant requested the benefit (express or implied); AND (4) the defendant would be unjustly enriched if not forced to compensate the plaintiff.
- Only restitution or reliance damages may be awarded under a
quasi-contract.
Reformation
Contracts - High
- Reformation allows a contract to be changed to conform to the parties’ original intent. It is available if a valid contract exists, but there was a misrepresentation OR mutual mistake of a material fact (a unilateral mistake is sufficient if the non-mistaken party had reason to know of the mistake). A contract will NOT be reformed if a valid equitable defense applies (i.e. unclean hands, laches). Parol evidence is admissible to prove the misrepresentation or mistake.
Recission
Contracts - High
- Rescission treats the original contract as cancelled. It is available if there was a problem with the formation of the contract (i.e. a defense to formation, fraud, misrepresentation). A plaintiff may sue for both damages and rescission at the same time (but an election of remedies may bar rescission if damages are sought first).
- A contract will NOT be rescinded if: (a) a valid equitable defense applies; OR (b) the plaintiff sued for damages under the contract in a prior action.
Specific Performance
Contracts - High
- Specific performance is an available remedy when: (1) a valid contract exists with clear and definite terms; (2) the plaintiff has performed under the contract or is ready, willing, and able to perform; (3) legal remedies are inadequate (i.e. rare/unique item, contracts involving the sale of land, as legal remedies are inadequate because land is unique); (4) enforcement is feasible for the court (it is NOT feasible to enforce personal service contracts or where land/person is outside the court’s jurisdiction); AND (5) no valid equitable or contractual defenses exist.
- Under the common law doctrine of mutuality, both parties must have been able to request specific performance. However, in many jurisdictions the requirement for mutuality is met if one party can sufficiently assure performance.
Torts: Available Legal Remedies
Torts - High
- The following damages are available in tort actions: (1) compensatory damages; (2) consequential damages; (3) nominal damages; (4) punitive damages; AND (5) restitution damages.
Compensatory Damages
Torts - High
- Compensatory damages attempt to put the injured party in the same position it would have been in but for the injury. To recover, the damages must be: (1) caused by the defendant (actual cause); (2) foreseeable (proximate cause); (3) certain (damages cannot be too speculative); AND (4) unavoidable (the plaintiff must take reasonable steps to mitigate his losses).
- Actual cause exists if: “but for” the defendant’s conduct, the plaintiff would not have been injured. Proximate cause exists if the plaintiff’s injury was a foreseeable result of the defendant’s conduct.
- Non-economic losses resulting from a tort (i.e. pain and suffering) are NOT subject to the same certainty rules. Additionally, future earnings are available, and are
calculated based on the difference in the person’s earning ability before the injury and the earning ability after the injury; it is NOT based on the person’s actual past earnings.
Nominal Damages
Torts - High
- Nominal damages are available when the plaintiff has NOT suffered an actual injury, but still wants to establish his rights. Nominal damages are not available where either damages or actual injury is an element to a cause of action.
Punitive Damages
Torts - Medium
- Punitive damages are awarded to punish the defendant, and are available if: (1) the plaintiff was awarded actual damages (expectation or nominal damages); (2) the punitive damages are proportional to the actual damages; AND (3) the defendant’s conduct was willful, malicious, or egregious (must be more than just negligent).
Restitution Damages
Torts - High
- Restitution (also referred to as unjust enrichment) is awarded to prevent unjust enrichment, and is available when one party confers a benefit onto another party. Damages will be awarded based on the value of the benefit conferred upon the defendant.
Temporary Restraining Orders
High
- A Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) is an emergency remedy used to maintain the status quo pending the outcome of a hearing or application (usually a preliminary injunction application), and is only available when the plaintiff will suffer immediate and irreparable harm.
- When deciding to grant a TRO on notice, the court will analyze the same factors as a preliminary injunction.
- A TRO can be issued ex parte (without notice to an adverse party).
- The court may issue an ex parte TRO only if the moving party: (1) provides specific facts in sworn statement that clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse party can be heard in opposition; (2) certifies in writing any efforts made to give notice to the adverse party and why notice should not be required; AND (3) gives security in an amount that the court deems proper (in Fed. Court, the United States, its officers, and its agencies are not required to give security).
-
Expiration of Ex-Parte TRO: In Federal Court, an ex parte TRO automatically
expires after 14 days (unless the court sets a shorter expiration). However, a court can extend the expiration of the TRO: (a) for good cause; OR (b) if the opposing party consents to the extension. An adverse party may move to dissolve or modify an ex parte TRO on two-day’s notice to the moving party. - In CA, a hearing for the preliminary injunction will be set if the TRO is granted. Such hearing must be no later than 15 days (or 22-days if there’s good cause) from the date the TRO is issued.