Religous Language Flashcards

1
Q

What is the difference in cognitive & non-cognitive language?

A

Cognitive - expresses knowledge & facts.

Non - Expresses things which we could never know to be true, e.g. feelings, values, metaphysical claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is ‘God exists’ a cognitive or non cognitive?

A

It looks like they are expressing a cognitive belief.

Some thinkers argue that it’s really more of a non-cognitive attitude/feeling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were logical positivists concerned with?

A

The relationship between the use of language and knowledge.

They rejected anything they saw as non-cognitive claims (fact-free) as meaningless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The LPs were influenced by Wittgenstein.

What quote from his book, Tractus, reflects a similar view?

A

‘Whereof we cannot speak, thereof we should be silent’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What group was verificationism invented by?
What key individual did it include?

A

The LP’s of the Vienna Circle.

A.J. Ayer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Wittgenstein suggest that is connected with meaningful language?

A

What we know from our senses.

How could RL link with sense experience?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“The term “God” is a…”
Language, Truth and Logic
A.J. Ayer

What does this lead Ayer to conclude?

A

“The term “God” is a metaphysical term. And if “God” exists is a metaphysical term, then it cannot even be probable that God exists.”

That he is not even an atheist because to say you do not believe in God, you are giving the term meaning.
“the fool says, in his heart, there is no God”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ayer created the Verification Principle.
What does this principle state?

A

“A statement which cannot be conclusively verified…is simply devoid of meaning.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

So, according to Ayer, for a statement to be meaningful it must be able to be demonstrated.

What are the two types of propositions that can hold meaning?

A

Analytic propositions

Synthetic propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are each of the propositions?

A

Analytic - true by definition.
a) required by the definition of words used.
b) they are mathematical.

Synthetic - true by conformation of the senses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

‘No sentance which describes the…”
A.J. Ayer

A

“…nature of a transcendent Hod can posses any literal significance”
A.J. Ayer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did S. Sutherland describe Ayer’s VP as?

A

‘conceptually restrictive and intellectually imperialistic in character’

  • criticism that the VP is overly restrictive.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Sutherland compare Ayer’s reduction of language into empirical categories to and why?

A

Newspeak

Because Ayer limits the possibility of poetic language & language about the transcendent which is so crucial to human flourishing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Newspeak’s goal?

A

To limit what people can talk about to practical empirical matters and descriptions.

Political & intellectual freedom doesn’t exist - ‘free’ would only be used in statements such as ‘this dog is free from lice.

Religion, philosophy, poetry, literature would be impossible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does Ayer strengthen his argument responding to criticisms of verificationism deeming historical statements meaningless because they can’t be empirically verified?

A

Weak verification

Ayer argues that we can weakly verify anything for which there is some evidence which provides probability, e.g. historical documents & archeological findings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Arguably, what does weak verification open the door to?

A

Arguments for God.

The teleological argument artemis to infer God’s existence using a posteriori reasoning & empirical evidence.

  • Ayer seems to fail his attempt to show RL is unverifiable, therefore, meaningless.
17
Q

However, this criticism fails as Ayer overcame it with his final version of the VP.

What developments does he make?

A

Along with weak verification, there is a further distinction.

Direct verification (DV) - verifiable by observation, e.g. ‘I see a key.’

Indirect verification (IV) - when a DV supports a statement which we haven’t directly verified but in principle know how to, e.g. ‘This key is made out of iron.’