Religious Experience: Psychological Flashcards
Freud’s view
- believed religion was a “universal obsessional neurosis” motivated by unconscious guilt
- “Those who cling to them (religion) do so because of the comfort they bring”
- from our unconscious (id and super-ego) complexes can emerge, if you are unaware of why you are feeling such a way, that is the projection of a complex => religious experiences are the projections of some of your desires onto the world
- an RE is an illusion of wish fulfilment from the deepest depths of our minds
Carl Jung’s view
- individuation is what we are trying to achieve in life and we are naturally drawn towards religion as it helps us individuate => an RE is subjective and non-cognitive, but it helps us become who we want to be
- religion is a projection of psychological truths, beneath all the stories, religion has a true meaning behind it
Define neurotheology
neuroscience of religion that wants to prove that RE are all in the mind
Newberg and D’Aquili
- attempted to induce a mystical experience through meditation
- superior temporal lobe behaved usually/decreased activity
- this part of the brain differentiates between self and world
Jung’s two levels of subconscious
- Personal
2. Collective: shared human experienced passed down through culture and these are made of archetypes
Jung: what are archetypes and how do they relate to RE
- they are shapes of experiences
- J thought God was an archetype, whether or not you believe in God, he has the same meaning as he is a unified self and symbol of universal psychology
- there is a pattern/order to mental experiences => God is a projection of unity that ties all experience together
- it is the archetypes of God that help you individuate
Evaluate Freud’s view
- Swinburne’s Principle of Credulity (assume an experience is true)
CP: can necessarily trust your experience as it may merely be a projection of your unconscious desire
+ some RE are induced by ‘wish fulfillment’, which is why they seem positive - Doesn’t seem true that all RE are useless as James has done research where the majority say that they have indeed learnt something from their experience
- J would say that wish fulfillment isn’t a bad thing and should not be dismissed on that basis
Evaluate Jung’s view
+ recognised a broader sense of our driving force, our libido is not just sex but Is rather based on energy
+ reason RE seem positive is because they actually individuate, v teleological
+ William James, RE are noetic, they give you knowledge
- Doesn’t necessarily prove the existence of God, only proves him a non-cognitive sense
- Theist would disagree, as God cognitively and objectively exists and you can see him within the world, not just in your mind