Religious experience Flashcards

God and the world

1
Q

Einstein quote

A

“the most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. it is the source of all true art and science. He to whom the emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand wrapped in awe, is as good as dead - his eyes are closed”
-refers to numinous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Religious experiences

A

-Peterson et al in ‘Reason and Religious Belief’ defines a religious experience as one where a “person has or believes they have had an encounter with God”
-religious experiences are revelations
-revelations = knowledge is gained about God that would otherwise not be known

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

types of religious experiences: Corporate (group) Religious Experiences

A

-examples; Toronto Blessing, Whirling Dervish and Lourdes
-Flew says that collecting together a series of weak arguments doesn’t make a strong argument e.g ten leaky buckets
-having ten leaky buckets doesn’t make one good bucket
-Mackie - people unintentionally mislead/exaggerate accounts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Examples of Corporate Religious Experiences

A

-Toronto blessing
-Origins: Began in 1994 at Toronto Airport Vineyard Church, Canada, during revival meetings
-Holy Spirit Manifestations: Marked by unusual physical and emotional reactions such as laughter, crying, falling, and shaking, believed to be caused by the Holy Spirit.
-Speaking in Tongues: Participants reported speaking in unknown languages as a spiritual gift.
-Healing and Renewal: Many claimed spiritual and physical healing, along with a renewed sense of faith and connection to God.
-Controversy: Critics viewed the phenomena as emotional excess or lacking biblical basis, while supporters emphasized its transformative effects – mass hysteria
-Charismatic Movement: The blessing became influential in charismatic and Pentecostal circles worldwide.
-Lasting Impact: Inspired global revivals, bringing attention to experiential worship and the role of the Holy Spirit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

types of religious experiences: Personal Testimonies

A

-examples, Numinous, St. Teresa of Avila and St Bernadette
-Swinburne, principle of credulity: testimonies should be taken at face value, unless there is significant evidence to prove them wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Richard Swinburne

A

-in ‘The Existence of God’ provides 5 ways to categorise personal testimonies
1.experience of God through a common, public, sensory object, e.g see God in a sunset, a way that God can be encountered (numinous)
2.experience of God through an unusual, public, object, e.g appearance of Virgin Mary at Lourdes
3.experience of God through private sensations that can be described in normal sensory language, e.g God in dreams and visions
4.experience of God through private sensations that cannot be described in normal sensory language, e.g feel or experience something, cannot be spoken about (ineffable)
5.experience of God that isn’t mediated by any sensation, e.g person claims to be aware of God through intuition such as higher meditational states of Hinduism/Buddhism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Teresa of Avila (1512-1582)

A

“I was at prayer… when I saw Christ at my side- or to put it better, I was conscious of Him, for neither with the eyes of the body nor with those of the soul did I see anything… but as this was not an imaginary vision, I could not discern in what form…”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Examples of Personal Testimonies

A

-St Teresa of Avila
-Ecstatic Visions: Experienced intense mystical visions of Jesus, angels, and heaven.
-Transverberation: Felt a physical and spiritual piercing of her heart by divine love, famously depicted in art.
-Union with God: Described a profound spiritual connection and closeness to God, beyond ordinary comprehension.
-interior Castle: Likened the soul’s journey to God to entering deeper chambers within a castle, symbolizing stages of spiritual growth.
-Catholic Recognition: Her experiences were deemed authentic by the Church, and she was canonized as a saint and Doctor of the Church.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conversion

A

-examples, Saul to St Paul, Nicky Cruz, Guru Nanak
-conversion- when you go from no religion to religion or one religion to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

examples of conversion experiences

A

-Nicky Cruz
-Gang Leader Conversion: Former leader of a violent New York gang, the Mau Maus.
-Encounter with Faith: Met preacher David Wilkerson, who spoke about Jesus’ love for him despite his actions.
-Transformation: Experienced a profound spiritual awakening, leading to repentance and abandoning his gang lifestyle.
-Evangelism Work: Became a Christian evangelist, sharing his story to inspire faith and transformation in others.
-Social Outreach: Works to help at-risk youth and gang members through faith-based programs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

William James (1842-1910)

A

-‘The Varieties of Religious Experience’
-James believes verification of RE wasn’t crucial
-the experience of the individual was real and that is what is important - ‘self authenticating’ for the person who has the experience (clear that God exists)
-RE =’solitary’ in which individuals experienced the Divine or God
-admitted not a logical proof that God exists, but evidence in support of God
-experiences explained as a part of a person’s psychological makeup - ‘psychological phenomena’ = natural like thinking or self awareness
-RE is central to religious belief
-James leaves open the possibility of God’s existence
-purpose of religion is not God but “more life, a larger, richer, more satisfying life.”
-religion leads to “consistency, stability”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

James: method

A

-James was a psychologist
-collected many testimonies of people who claimed to have had religious experiences
-analysed them
-categorised into types
-then noted common features
-he noted effects on people’s lives
-known as ‘pragmatic’ approach
-means he was concerned with the actual, practical effects on people, not supernatural speculations
-‘effects’ James could not see their actual RE but he could see/study their effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

James: findings

A

-commonly, these experiences have a profound effect on people - life transforming
-positive effects: happier outlook on life, sense of purpose and meaning, benefits to sense of morality, better relationships with others
-distinguished between the ‘healthy minded soul’ and the ‘sick soul’:
-healthy minded: open to ideas and possibilities, optimistic and hopeful
-sick soul: cynical and sceptical
-Religious experience tends to make people healthy minded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Four ways to define Religious experience

A
  1. ineffability: most recognised characteristics of RE - beyond words
  2. noetic quality: knowledge and information gained about God/revelation
  3. transiency: experience doesn’t last long but lasting effect on person - well remembered
  4. passive: undergoing RE no control, taken over, consumed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

James: main conclusions

A

-effects are real= real cause, if God is believed to be the cause, then God exists to those individuals
-real and true = positive effects, whereas things that are false have negative effects
-religious experience has positive effects, so source is more likely to be real and true
-therefore God is likely to be real and true
-scripture is often seen as the central source of Churches but James emphasises the importance of revelation and prayer
-this notable change in behaviour is why James suggested that RE was the inspiration and source of religious institutions
-compared parallels and similarities between RE and other types of experiences (dreams and hallucinations)
-suggested that RE could link to our subconscious ideas
-concluded that RE on their own do not demonstrate God’s existence although they can suggest the existence of ‘something larger’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mystical religious experiences

A

-mysticism: direct knowledge of God, spiritual truth or ultimate reality is revealed. this can be a subjective personal experience
-mystical experience: an experience of something transcendent beyond ‘moral’ awareness
-means that all RE’s we have studied can be linked to mystical experiences

17
Q

FC Happold (1893-1971)

A

-‘mysticism’ = book
-three aspects of mystical experience:
1. soul mysticism - finding the soul, complete self-fulfilment (not necessarily involving God)
2. nature mysticism - belief that God is everywhere (immanent)
3. God-mysticism - souls desire to return to their immortal and infinite ground, which is God
-two types of mysticism:
1. mysticism of Love and Union - need to be part of something bigger than ourselves
2. mysticism of Knowledge and Understanding - need to find out answers to the ‘secrets’ of the universe/ to know the ‘whole story’

18
Q

critics of religious experiences: psychological

A

-because RE are often seen as unusual, some conclude that they may be interpreted as just illusions
-we know our minds play tricks on us or that some children have imaginary friends or you might even hear voices saying your name or a sudden sense of foreboding
-we are prone to perceptual errors so maybe experiences with God or a greater power is just another example
-Myers “prayer is a vital component of the psychological wellbeing of many individuals”

19
Q

critics: Feuerbach

A

-religion is an illusion
-religion is a fiction people mistake for reality
-humans can feel alienated in own lives and project their wishes onto God
-is people were able to reach potential no need fro religion
-society will evolve and religion will disappear – (no evidence for this)
-God is an invention of the human mind

20
Q

God helmet study

A

-Device Purpose: A headpiece designed to study religious and mystical experiences through neuroscience.
-Created By: Dr. Michael Persinger in the 1980s.
Mechanism: Uses weak magnetic fields targeted at the brain’s temporal lobes.
-Reported Effects: Some participants report feelings of a “presence,” religious awe, or out-of-body experiences.
-Religious Implications: Suggests that religious experiences may have a neurological basis.
-Criticism: Results have been questioned due to replication issues and placebo effects.
-Cultural Impact: Sparked debates about the origin of religious experiences and their connection to brain activity.

21
Q

critics: Freud

A

-famous psychologists
-founder of psychoanalysis
-explains away religion as purely a psychological phenomenon - cushion us from harsh realities
-religion is an ‘obsessional neurosis’
-a neuroses describes problems experienced in life, e.g traumas that are repressed in the mind and develop into obsessive neurosis in adulthood, e.g repetitive behaviour
-thus, belief in God = obsessional neurosis that religion satisfies

22
Q

Freud: the Mind

A

-the mind has three parts (drives our mind):
1. the ID: human instincts, desires and appetites
2. the ego: shaped by external influences - traumas, education, upbringing
3. the superego: part of ego, human reason, make decisions, parenting values and influence mould superego, superego is where the conscience is found

23
Q

Iceberg analogy

A

-ego: conscious - based upon guilt of disappointing parents
-superego: conscious, preconscious and unconscious - must conform to societies behavioural expectations
-ID: unconscious - deep in the unconscious mind - son’s love of mother (oedipus complex)
-God is the parental figure people run too

24
Q

evaluation of Freud: strength

A

-founder of psychoanalysis
-fundamental in the development of dreams, mind (ID, ego and superego) and conscious, subconscious, unconscious (iceberg) ideas
-clear that parents/environment affect our morals ad ethical ideas

25
Q

evaluation of Freud: weaknesses

A

-flaws in his data collection, e.g unethical/unscientific case studies done: Little Hans
-what about children from single parent families or modern families - Freud implies they are immoral = illogical
-don’t people have more control over their actions and decisions?
-is this bordering on reductionist? (too simple)

26
Q

critics of religious experiences: physiological

A

-drink, drugs, tiredness, illness, depression, fasting, dehydration all change the way we think and experience the world
-one mental state may deeply affect a physical state, e.g lack of sleep = hallucinations
-William of Ockham famously says “entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity” – the simplest solution that covers all the facts, is usually the best – Ockham’s Razor
-Russell remarked upon Beatrice Webb’s focus on fasting, saying “if you eat too little, you see visions and if you drink too much, you see snakes”
-poor diet: delirium tremens is caused by vitamin B deficiency (e.g alcohol withdrawal)
-some scholars argue that an ascetics’ diet lacks vitamin B so could explain, hallucinations, paranoia, visions, voices etc.

27
Q

Alston

A

-our sense experience is generally reliable why should we not believe what our senses tell us
-there is no reason to reject an explanation of something just because the explanation is unusual
-do not show that RE are experiences of God just that it isn’t fair to simply reject religious experiences as illogical and irrational

28
Q

AO2 evaluation: strengths

A

-individual knows and understand the meaning of what they see or feel
-relatively common
-people that have them, hold with great conviction and are often consistent in their recollection
-often experienced by people who are not mentally ill, on drugs, who are rational and intelligent
-RE is God taking an involvement in human affairs so he is a personal being. but can’t do it too frequently as it would seriously jeopardise our free will

29
Q

AO2 evaluation: weaknesses

A

-could be influence of drugs - can produce hallucinations/similar effects and alcohol
-in most cases individuals undergo experiences not groups
-RE based on emotion - it is a personal response = empirical testing is useless
-each one portrays this ‘being’ differently - what is reliable?
-spontaneous so can never be verified (proven)
-non physical/private/individual so not easy to verify. how can we verify something we cannot fully understand/communicate or discuss properly?