religion renewal and choice Flashcards
Davie
Believing without belonging- holding religious beliefs without belonging to an organisation.
Spiritual health service- only using religion when we need it e.g funerals in churches
Voas and Crockett- criticism
Both belief and attendance is declining
Hervieu-Leger
Cultural amnesia- we’re forgetting how to be religious because of lack of religious socialisation.
Spiritual shopping:
Pilgrims- pick and choose what they like and want to follow from different religions.
Converts- switch from one religion to the next.
Lyon
Disembedded religion- religion is no longer tied to just inside the church e.g televangelism.
Links this to globalisation, increase in media and growth in consumerism.
Hellend
Online religion- churches can provide services online.
Religion online- communities of religions that exist online.
Cowan
Studied pagans who gained self-worth through belonging to a global network online.
Berger
Loss of faith in meta-narratives: no monopoly of truth
Heelas and Woodhead- the New Age
There’s been a spiritual revolution.
Congregational domain- people who belong to organised religion
Hollistic milleau- people who focus on individualism and spirituality
Lyon- reenchantment of the world
The world is becoming more spiritual with the west turning to non-traditional religion.
Stark and Bainbridge
Criticise secularisation for being too eurocentric.
Religion offers compensators e.g life after death.
Cycle of renewal- religious decline, revival, and renewal.
Religious competition- composition leads to improvement.
Stark and Bainbridge- ‘religious market theory’ (America vs. Europe)
America:
- religion thrives as there’s no religious monopoly (have freedom of religion)
- religions continuously fight to improve and offer individuals what they want so that they gain followers.
Europe:
- national religion
- religion doesn’t change or improve because its position isn’t threatened.
Norris and Inglehart
Religiosity in societies is because of existential security.
Poor societies- have life-threatening risk (famine/disease) creating high insecurity and therefore high religiosity.
Rich societies- high standard of living, low risk, high security, therefore more secular.
Gill and Lundegaarde
Support N and I- the more a country spends on welfare, the less religious participant there is
Vasquez- criticism
N and I used quantitative data (just looked at income), didn’t take into account what ‘existential security’ meant to people