religion and life Flashcards
what does scientific truth come from
making a hypothesis then testing it to see if it is true
what does religious truth come from
religions and holy books
comparison of religion vs science (absoluteness)
although religion and holy books can be open to interpretation, their words do not change. the truth of religion is considered to be absolute; unchanging and relevant for all times. however, scientific truth is always open to being developed and added to, and is challenged and tested by other theories, meaning it is not absolute. instead, it is conditional; true when based on the conditions in which the observation took place
comparison of religion vs science (answer)
science answers the function and process of life, but religion answers the purpose and meaning of life. in other words, religion gives us answers to ultimate questions which even science has no answer for
comparison of religion vs science (evidence)
science stems from empiricism, which is observation through the senses to gain knowledge of the physical world, whereas religion stems from the metaphysical, where ideas are harder to observe or check through experience
why does society seem to favour science over religion
- evidence based
- science is modern, religion is ancient
- science is more definite, religion is a possibility
- science has hypotheses and tests, but with religion we retain our views regardless of contrary evidence
why does religion still prove strong in the world
- science doesn’t make you feel anything, whereas religion provides purpose, reassurance, comfort, happiness etc
- out of fear of God
- religion gives life meaning and purpose
- people want to believe there is LAD to bring them comfort
- religion has all the answers already, whereas science doesn’t
- due to the promise of an afterlife
what is the Big Bang theory
the theory that the universe began as very hot, small and dense with no atoms, form or structure. then about 14 billion years ago, space expanded very quickly, resulting in the formation of atoms, which eventually led to the creation of stars and galaxies
evidence for the Big Bang theory
- scientists can observe that the universe is still expanding because of the distortion of light and wavelength; this is called the ‘red shift’ discovered by Edward Hubble
- if the universe is constantly expanding, this must mean that at one point, it was much smaller and had a starting point
- explosions (like the Big Bang) cause radiation, and this cosmic background radiation can still be detected in space
limitations of the Big Bang theory
- it contradicts the law of conservation of energy; before the Big Bang, the universe had no atoms or structure, but after, it did
- perhaps there’s evidence that hasn’t been discovered yet which could disprove this theory
- there’s an element of faith to it; the bottom drawer syndrome explains the bias in science, where scientists won’t publish evidence that is contradictory to their theory
- we can’t see the universe expanding with our own eyes, we’re merely trusting science (links back to element of faith)
Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution
Darwin suggested that the world is a place of change, and that the huge variety of creatures and species is the result of thousands of years of change and adaptation
Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection
Darwin states that there is a struggle for survival between species because of competing demands and limits of resources like food, space, etc. where species failed to adapt, they became extinct, so that only the fittest could survive
evidence for evolution
- fossils of animals long extinct have been discovered buried many layers beneath the surface of the earth
- environments are always changing, and creatures have to get used to this and adapt; e.g. polar bears have thick layers of fur to survive in the cold
limitations of evolution
- Darwin explained the survival of the fittest but not the arrival of the fittest; natural selection didn’t explain the evolution
- it doesn’t necessarily disprove the existence of God; even Darwin himself accepted the involvement of God in evolution, and believed that God created the original lifeforms with the ability to adapt and change
Richard Dawkin’s take on scientific explanations of the world
Dawkins, an atheist, believes in the Big Bang theory, and explains that if God started the Big Bang, it would leave God Himself unexplained; what started God?
what does Richard Dawkins say about design
everything has been designed through natural selection; it’s the only plausible thing that can account for the illusion of design
what does Richard Dawkins say about the purpose of our existence
Dawkins says that each one of us can make our own purposes; we were put here by chance, just like rivers or forests, therefore there is no purpose of our existence
what does Richard Dawkins say is the difference between science and religion
science is based on evidence and fact and has nothing to do with opinions or faith. religion, on the other hand, never has any evidence behind its beliefs
why does Paul Taylor say that he doesn’t need evidence for his faith
all scientists interpret scientific facts based on their prior belief, therefore Taylor can interpret scientific facts based on his belief in the Bible; his faith itself is the evidence
what is theistic evolution
a belief that some Christians hold, suggesting that both the scientific explanations and the Bible are correct e.g., God used the Big Bang to create the universe
what does Alister McGrath say about ‘truth’
the natural world isn’t clear enough to determine whether God exists, therefore whether we believe He does or doesn’t, both responses are based on faith + personal belief. although some questions can be answered by science, others, like the meaning of life, can only be answered by religion; you have to refer to both to find the truth
why is God’s ambiguity important
if God’s existence was proven, religion would have no purpose, therefore faith would be non applicable. this proves the importance of faith and religion
what is the creationist view
the belief that Genesis contains the exact historical account of the creation of the universe; the theories of evolution and the Big Bang theory are wrong
seven days of creation
1) light and dark
2) sea and sky
3) land and plants
4) sun, moon and stars
5) fish and birds
6) animals and humans
7) God rested
what do literalist Christians believe
that the creation story as told in Genesis is word for word true. they believe in an omnibenevolent, omnipotent and omniscient God, so it is easy to believe that God could create the world in this way
what do liberalist Christians believe
that the creation story as told in Genesis is simply a story to help Christians understand that God is the creator of the world; it emphasises the power of God. liberals accept scientific theories such as the Big Bang and evolution, as they could believe that God caused them
key messages in the story of creation
- humans have a purpose; they were deliberately made by the Creator
- this was a designed and considered creation, not just an accidental occurrence
creation quote
‘In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth’
argument over the time period of creation
the original language documenting the story of creation literally translates to ‘periods of time’; perhaps this was not referring to days
define dominion
the idea that humans have the right to control all of creation
define stewardship
the idea that humans have a duty to look after the world, and life
importance of awe
- the sense of awe for theists makes them praise God more because they believe God created the world
- He is responsible for the things that make them feel this way, and they want to worship Him more as a result
define awe
an overwhelming feeling often of reverence, with a link to God
define instrumental value
something has value because it satisfies human needs and wants
define intrinsic value
something has value in itself
define wonder
marvelling at the complexity and beauty of the universe
who is Andrew Linzey
the leading modern Christian writer on animal rights
what does Andrew Linzey teach
he believes that God’s love is intended ‘not just for human beings but for all creatures’. he teaches that Christians should treat every sentient animal according to its intrinsic God-given worth, and not according to its usefulness to human beings
Christian arguments for stewardship
- the universe was created for God, not for humanity
- humans and animals were created together on the sixth day of creation, hinting that they’re of equal importance
- God put himself into creation and died for it on the Cross; since God cares for all creation so much, human beings should too
- Arne Naess states that ‘everything has the right to bloom and grow’; by harming animals, we’re stripping them of this right
- if humans didn’t look after the world, or did nothing to stop its destruction, they should expect to be punished by God; this motivates many Christians to do environmental work
Christian quotes for stewardship
- ‘God made the world and gave the duty of stewardship to humans’
- ‘The Earth is the Lord’s and everything in it’
- ‘People are responsible for the future of the planet’ ; Pope John Paul II
Islamic attitudes to the environment
- humans are the trustees of Allah’s creation; trustees look after things, rather than destroy them
- those who do not follow their duty of looking after the world will be punished on the Day of Judgement by Allah
- the Muslim community (ummah), are a brotherhood, including those in the past and future. everyone has a duty to their family and fellow humans to make sure they pass on to them a world fit to live in
- Prophet Muhammad set an example of not wasting, and only ever washed in water from a container, rather than contaminating the river or other running water
Islamic quotes for attitudes to the environment
- ‘The world is green and beautiful, and Allah has appointed you His stewards over it’
- ‘The whole earth has been created as a place of worship’
- ‘The earth has been created for me as a mosque and a means of purification’ ; Hadith