Religion and belief - article 9 Flashcards

1
Q

what does section 1 of article 9 say?

A

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes the freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does section 2 say?

A

Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is protected under article 9? - and what kind of protection do they have?

A
  • freedom of thought, conscience and religion and to change religion or belief (absolute protection)
  • manifestation of belief or religion (qualified right)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what can states not interfere with?

A

the absolute right to hold or change a belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

who may be capable of exercising article 9 rights?

A

churches and associations with religious and philosophical objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

who cannot rely on article 9 rights?

A

profit making corporations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the two requirements that a belief must satisfy to be accepted within the scope of article 9?

A
  1. The belief must “attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance”
  2. The belief itself must be one which may be considered as compatible with respect for human dignity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what must the belief be to be in the scope of article 9 according to Grainger v Nicholson?

A
  • belief must be genuinely held
  • it must be a belief and not an opinion or viewpoint based on the present state of information available
  • must be a belief as to a weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour
  • must attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance
  • must be worthy of respect in a democratic society, be not incompatible with human dignity and not conflict with the fundamental rights of others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the accepted religions?

A

Buddhism
Christianity
Hinduism
Islam
Judaism
Sikhism
Mormonism
Druid ceremony
Rastafarianism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the accepted non-religious beliefs?

A

pacifism
conscientious objectors
attachment to secularism
veganism
opposition to the manipulation of products of animal origin or tested on animals
temperance
climate change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If a personal or collective conviction is to benefit from the right to “freedom of thought, conscience and religion”, what must it attain?

A

a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what do the courts have power to do?

A

Courts to determine which beliefs are or are not worthy of protection and respect in democracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

in relation to manifestation of beliefs what questions need to be asked?

A
  • is the belief within the scope of article 9?
  • is the activity a manifestation of that belief?
  • is there an interference with the manifestation
  • is the interference with the manifestation justified under article 9?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is a manifestation?

A

A “manifestation” implies a perception on the part of adherents that a course of activity is in some manner prescribed or required.

The action must be a direct expression of the belief, though it need not be a definite, universally acknowledged, requirement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

to be a manifestation of a belief what must an action do?

A

Relate to a protected belief
Be intimately linked to the belief itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is an example of manifestation?

A

act of worship or devotion which forms part of the practice of a religion or beliefs in a generally recognised form

17
Q

what did Arrowsmith v United Kingdom conclude about an action that is intimately connected?

A

A distinction must be drawn between an activity central to the expression of a religion or belief, and one which is merely inspired or even encouraged by it

18
Q

what does manifestation not cover?

A

Manifestation “does not cover each act which is motivated or influenced by a religion or a belief”

19
Q

what is held to be manifestation?

A

-Proselytism
-General participation in the life of a religious community
-The slaughtering of animals in accordance with religious prescriptions
-Preventing worship by refusing to provide legal recognition to an organisation (Church of -BessarabiavMoldova(2002))
-Religious Dress - Leyla SahinvTurkey(2007)
-Dietary requirements – slaughter rituals required by Judaism (Cha’are Shalom Ve TsedekvFrance 2000)
-Corporal punishment in schools (R (Williamson)vSecretary of State for Education and Employment[2005]

20
Q

what is not held to be manifestation?

A

-The distribution of pacifist leaflets to soldiers (Arrowsmith)
-Refusing to sell contraceptives that had been prescribed to women (Pichon and SajousvFrance2001)
-Assisting in another’s suicide (as inPrettyvUnited Kingdom(2002)
-Commercial advertising to promote a belief (as inX and Church of ScientologyvSweden[1979]

21
Q

what are examples of an interference with the manifestation?

A

-Criminal or administrative penalty (Kokkinakis v. Greece)
-Dismissal (Ivanova v. Bulgaria 2007)
-A disciplinary sanction, regardless of its severity (Korostelev v. Russia, § 50)
-A physical obstacle to the persons exercising their rights under Article 9, such as the interruption of a meeting by the police (Boychev and Others v. Bulgaria);
-The dissolution of a religious organisation (Jehovah’s Witnesses of Moscow and Others v. Russia, §§ 99-103; Biblical Centre of the Chuvash Republic v. Russia, § 52;
-Denial of authorisation, recognition or approval designed to facilitate the exercise of the said rights (Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova; Vergos v. Greece

22
Q

what are the elements for the interference to be justified?

A
  • prescribed by law = basis, in national law, accessible, foreseeable
  • legitimate purpose
  • necessary in a democratic society
23
Q

what are the listed grounds for a legitimate purpose under 9(2)?

A

public safety;
for the protection of public order;
health or morals;
or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

24
Q

what makes an interference necessary in a democratic society?

A

Pressing social need
Proportionate to the aim pursued (4 requirements seen previously)
Justified by relevant and sufficient reasons

25
Q

in the workplace what does article 9 not require?

A

active facilitation of religious beliefs in the workplace - Stedman v United Kingdom (1997)

Part of the difficult in the workplace is the idea that the employee is free to resign to manifest their beliefs.

26
Q

when is it unlikely that there will be infringements or violations?

A

Where there are links to ‘safety’ or ‘security’ concerns, and the removal of clothing and artefacts is temporary