Reliability/Validity Terms Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Reliability definition

A

The consistency of a measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

3 types of reliability

A

internal consistency, stability, equivalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Internal consistency

A

correlation of single item to the total scale/measure of how well a set of items on a test or survey are measuring the same thing/construct / a measure of internal consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Split half reliability

A

divide questions in half into 2 groups (odd numbered/even numbered), calculate score for each half, and compare both halves to determine correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cronbach’s Alpha

A

Average of al possible split half reliabilities / how closely related a set of items are as a group by comparing the amount of shared variance among the items to the amount of overall variance

three or more response options

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Kuder Richardson Coefficient

A

Average of all possible split-half reliabilities where each question only has 2 answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Test-Retest Reliability

A

part of stability – giving identical measure to the same group of participants after time has passed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Interrater Reliability

A

Part of equivalence: Do multiple raters agree on ratings?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Alternate forms of reliability

A

Part of equivalence: administer more than one form of a test to the same people - check to see if the forms are equivalent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Validity

A

does the scale measure what it is supposed to measure?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

content validity

A

does the instrument assess all aspects of the construct and exclude irrevelant issues? e.g. an awe scale w/ good content validity would cover both aspects and exclude irrelevant concepts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

face validity

A

A type of content validity: does the test measure what it appears to measure?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

criterion validity

A

how well a measure correlates with an established measure of comparison (criterion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are 2 ways to assess criterion validity?

A

concurrent and predictive validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Concurrent validity

A

does the measure relate to other measures that assess the same thing (does a new measure of gratitude relate to other measures of gratitude)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Predictive validity

A

does the measure predict future behavior?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

construct validity

A

how well does the scale measure the underlying concept?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What’s the first way to assess construct validity?

A

Convergent/divergent validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

2nd way to assess construct validity?

A

factorial validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

3rd way to assess construct validity?

A

Discriminant validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

convergent/divergent validity

A

is the measure related (convergent) or unrelated (divergent) to other constructs as one would expect? e.g. A new measure of gratitude is positively related to positive affect and unrelated to intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Factorial validity

A

Factor analysis shows whether items measure construct in a coherent way – identifying underlying factors/patterns that influence observed variables - group together highly correlated variables - identifying cluster of items tend to be answered the same way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Discriminant validity

A

Discriminate between groups of people as expected
e.g. A measure of depression distinguishes between those diagnosed with depression and those who have not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Snowball Sample

A

Current participants help to recruit new ones from acquaintainces/Useful when population members are hard to locate/Hard to make inferences about population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Random Sample

A

Every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Stratified random sample

A

Individuals selected randomly within each strata (subgroup) of importance

e.g. E.g. divide Skidmore students into first year, sophomore, junior, and senior and randomly select within each subgroup

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Convenience Sample

A

Selecting your sample based upon convenience – participants are readily accessible/ but Sample may not be representative of the population!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Who launched positive psychology?

A

Martin Seligman (APA president from 1997-1998)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What does PERMA stand for?

A

Positive emotions, engagement, positive relationships, meaning, accomplishments

29
Q

Who are the stoic philosophers who were the forerunners of PP/what did they believe in?

A

Xeno of Citium and Epictetus

30
Q

Who built the Early psychological foundations?

A

William James, Carl Jung, Abraham Maslow, carl Rogers, Victor Frankl

31
Q

Differences between positive/humanistic psychology?

A

PP:
- Seligman argues it has a stronger empirical basis
- Prefers quantitative research over qualitative
- Focuses on self and collective well-being/how people flourish in adversity
- Helping people discover and nurture strengths
- Outcome - focused

HP:
- Ignores research on humanistic approaches
- Prefers qualitative research over quantitative research
- Greater focus on self (according to seligman)/quality of experiences
- Helping people achieve their potential
- Process-oriented

32
Q

Definition of Awe

A

Awe is the feeling of being in the presence of something vast that transcends your current understanding of the world (keltner, 2023 page 7 of eight wonders reading)

33
Q

Components of Awe?

A

Vastness and accommodation/transcendence

34
Q

Benefits of awe?

A
  • Promotes generosity
  • Strengthens positive emotions
  • Increasing life satisfaction
  • Lower stress
  • Enhances immune system
35
Q

Dark Side of Awe

A

negative/terrifying experiences producing awe – Hiking up a very steep mountain – scary because it’s so high-up but the views are beautiful
- If someone did something cruel
- Natural disasters – tsunami, earthquakes, forest fires
- Deep ocean and creatures
- Terminal diagnoses
- Mass violence
- A long-term relationship
- Negative awe can be helpful/harmful!

35
Q

Non self report ways to measure awe

A

Observer report (Ask others (family, friends, colleagues) to provide ratings)

Facial measures (Code for facial cues using a standardized system (Facial action Coding system))

Physiological measures - heart rate, blood pressure, respiration, skin conductance

Neuroimaging - FMRI

36
Q

Self report measures for awe

A

Self-reports / scales / surveys – the most accurate

Physiological measures like heart rate, eye-tracking
(Don’t know if your measuring awe… but accurate way to measure)

Neuroimaging

Change in facial expressions

Showing someone pictures, videos on a vast screen – to measure awe and beauty – compare small versus big screens

37
Q

Pros and cons of self report measures

A

Advantages – not very hard to do, deliver your reaction/survey, not expensive - practical logistical reasons
Rich data

Cons - biased, may not give honest answers due to not being comfortable, put down what the researcher wants to hear

38
Q

What was the Likert type measure/scale and who was it developed by?

A

Likert Type Measures - developed in 1932 by Rensis Likert for doctoral dissertation

Rating scale to assess thoughts, feelings, behaviors

Respondent given a range of options on dimensions such as:
- How strongly they experience the emotion
- How frequently they experience the emotion
- Level of agreement with the statement

39
Q

Factors to consider when making the scale

A

Number of Questions: How many questions do you want your scale to have?

40
Q

Pros/cons of using a single item measure?

A

Pros: simple/fast to administer, works if construct is a single dimension, narrow in scope, unambiguous, concrete

Cons: doesn’t assess construct in a comprehensive way / small wording changes or features of response options can bias responses / more items, any idiosyncratic responses will wash out / not sufficient for complex and/or abstract constructs/can’t use it for a bigger concept

41
Q

For most constructs in positive psychology, multiple item measures are preferable

A

TRUE

42
Q

What is the minimum number of items needed for internal consistency?

A

At least 4 items needed

43
Q

How does the number of items impact reliability?

A

Reliability increases above 5 but each additional item makes less impact

if scale is too long, participants may struggle with focus/refuse to complete

44
Q

How many items is sufficient for most constructs in final scale?

A

around 5-7 items – may want to create twice as many items in initial survey

45
Q

Number of points on rating scale? (anchors)

A

Between 5-7 scale points are optimal

46
Q

Over what time period do you want participants to reflect upon?

A

Retrospective reports:
Remember your thoughts, feelings over past month, week, day

Present moment:
- How do you feel at this moment in time
- Experience sampling methodology (ESM) or Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)
- Send signals periodically (through cell phone) prompting people to respond to the survey
- ESM - research technique that asks participants to fill out questionnaires multiple times a day over a period of days - goal is to capture real-time data about thoughts/feelings

Also known as EMA - used interchangeably - goal of both methods is to reduce recall bias and enhance ecological validity

47
Q

Do you want all items to be worded in the same direction or include some worded in the opposite direction?

A

Same direction?

48
Q

item clarity: are your items clear and easy for all participants to understand?

A

Item wording:
- Clear, short (no more than 20 words), unambiguous, written at about a 6th grade vocabulary level, simple rather than compound sentences, relevant to the construct being measured, matters of opinion rather than factual

Items for scales should:
- Cover the entire range of affect or opinion

49
Q

Avoiding double negatives

A

2 negatives in the same sentence

e.g. “I am not unsatisfied” // “I am not without any anxiety”

50
Q

Avoid double barreled items!

A

items that ask more than one question but allow for only one answer

e.g. “I am sad and anxious” – could be both or sad and not anxious

51
Q

Avoid leading questions

A

items that may prompt participants to respond a certain way!

e.g. “The majority of people state they are happy. How often are you happy?”

52
Q

Who coined the term eugenics in 1883?

A

Francis Galton (cousin of charles darwin)

53
Q

What was Galton’s pseudoscientific theory?

A

that humans could be improved through “selective breeding” (breeding organisms with specific traits to produce offspring with more desirable characteristics)

54
Q

Why was this theory controversial?

A

Rooted in prejudiced ideas on race, class, gender —- overemphasized heredity

55
Q

Racism in psychological testing: who formed the stanford binet intellgience tests in 1916?

A

Lewis Terman

56
Q

Why were these IQ tests controversial?

A

Differences across groups used to justify segregated schools - identify children with learning difficulties and find children with above IQ to place people in certain placements

World war 1:
- Testing used to discriminate against people of color and immigrants

57
Q

Who was Arthur Jensen?

A

father of modern racism

Argued IQ was hereditary and certain racial groups performed consistently worse on these tests and these differences indicated a natural hierarchy of intelligence, implying some races were superior to others - misinterpreted IQ as a fixed measure of worth/promoted stereotypes about racial capabilites

Jensen was responsible for resurrecting the idea that the black population is inherently and immutably less intelligent than the white population, an ideology that immediately became known as “jensenism.”

Jensen promoted eugenics as the only practical solution to the problems facing the black community, arguing that they lacked the intelligence necessary for compensatory education programs to be successful.

“[T]here are intelligence genes, which are found in populations in different proportions, somewhat like the distribution of blood types. The number of intelligence genes seems to be lower, over-all, in the black population than in the white.

58
Q

Who was in support of racist laws:

A

Henry Garrett (former APA president in 1946)

provided courtroom testimony in support of segregation in 1952

1967 - testified in opposition to civil rights atc

59
Q

limited opportunities: from the top 6 journals from 1974-2018, what percent of editors were people of color?

A

5%

People of color have historically been underrepresented in psychological research

60
Q

Access to Mental Health Care:

A

In US, people of color are:
- diagnosed with more severe disorders
- Less likely to receive quality mental health care
- Experience more barriers to receiving mental health treatment

61
Q

MLK Jr. speech to APA

A

Spoke at APA in 1967
- Outlined science’s responsibility to draw attention to systemic racism
- Notion of adjustment cannot be separated from oppressive social structures

62
Q

Mindfulness based stress reduction (empirically supported)

A

Founded by John Kabat Zinn

Goal was to make helpful buddhist teachings and practices available to mainstream U.S

Buddhist roots were briefly acknowledged

Mindfulness framed in secular ways (non-religious ways) to appeal to larger audience like hospitals and clinics - less focus on spiritual roots

63
Q

Sampling Strategies: Pros of PS 101 participant pool

A
  • Helps support many research projects at universities
  • Learning experience for students - better appreciation for the scientific process
  • Can make contribution to the discipline they are studying
64
Q

Ethical considerations of PS 101 participant pool

A
  • Are students able to participate voluntarily or are they being coerced?
  • Are there any consequences from withdrawing?
  • What are the methodological limitations of using PS 101 students?
65
Q

WEIRD participants

A

Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic

66
Q

Is positive psychology WEIRD

A

Hendricks et al 2019

Overview/Method
- Searched for randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) studies on positive psychology interventions between 1998-2017
- Included 187 articles in the study

Results

Majority of studies (78%) conducted in western studies

Majority of studies conducted in countries classified as industrialized (71%) highly educated (71%), high income (71%), and democratic (63%)

Increase in publications from Non-Western countries since 2012

Trend toward globalization of positive psychology research

67
Q

WEIRD participants

A

2008 study of top psychology journals - 96% of participants from Western Industrialized Countries

Describes only 12% of population

Researchers often mistakenly assume their results can generalize

Differences found between western and non western individuals with variety of psychological constructs

68
Q

What’s a representative sample?

A

Participants in the sample are similar on key characteristics to those in the population