Relevance & Policy Exclusions Flashcards

1
Q

401 Relevance Test

A

Relevant if

  1. It has any tendency to makes a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence
  2. The fact is of consequence in determining the action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Evidence must relate to

A

Time, event, person in controversy

UNLESS

  1. Certain similar occurrences
  2. Causation
  3. Prior false claims - person previously filed similar false claims, relevant to prove present claim likely false
  4. Same bodily injury- persons condition attributable to prior injury
  5. Similar accident or injury caused by same event or condition. Admissible to prove:
    Existence of dangerous condition
    D had knowledge of dangerous condition
    Dangerous condition cause of present injury
  6. Previous similar acts to prove intent
  7. Rebut claim of impossibility
  8. Sales of similar property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Habit

A

Describes persons regular response to specific set of circumstances.

Person’s habit may be admitted to prove that on particular occasion person acted in accordance with habit

Instinctively, automatically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Industrial business routine

A

Evidence business had established routine relevant as tendency to show particular event occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Industry custom

A

As evidence of standard of care may be offered to show adherence to or deviation from standard of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

402 General admissibility or relevant evidence

A

Relevant evidence is generally admissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

403

A

Court may exclude relevant evidence if it’s probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of one or more of the following:

  1. Unfair prejudice
  2. Confusing the issues
  3. Misleading the jury
  4. Undue delay
  5. Wasting time
  6. Needlessly presenting cumulative evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

407 subsequent remedial measures

A

Inadmissible: to prove

  1. negligence
  2. culpable conduct
  3. defect in product or design
  4. need for warning label

Admissible: to prove

  1. ownership or control
  2. Rebut claim precautions were impossible
  3. Prove destruction of evidence
  4. Feasibility of precautionary measures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

408 settlement offers

A

Inadmissible: to prove or disprove

  1. Validity or amount of claim
  2. Impeach by prior inconsistent statement or contradiction

Admissible:

  1. Proving witness bias or prejudice
  2. Negating contention of undue delay
  3. Proving effort to obstruct criminal investigation or prosecution
  4. Civil disputes with governmental authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

409 offers to pay/ payment of medical expenses

A

Inadmissible: to prove culpable conduct

Admissible: for all other purposes
1. Admissions of facts accompanying offer to pay medical expenses are admissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

410 pleas, plea discussions and related statements

A

Inadmissible:

Withdrawn guilty pleas, pleas of nolo contendre, offers to plead guilty and statements made during plea negotiations generally inadmissible in any proceedings against D who participated in plea discussions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

411 liability insurance

A

Inadmissible: to prove

  1. Negligence
  2. Ability to pay

Admissible: to prove

  1. Ownership or control
  2. As impeachment
  3. As part of proving agency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly