Relevance in SA psychology Flashcards
SA in the mid-1970s
- regionally: civil war (rhodesia, mozam, angola)
- 1974: First Professional Board for Psychology established
- 1976: TV introduces to SA, riots in Soweto and CT
- 1978: joint psychology conferences of SAPA and PIRSA
-mounting local and international censure of apartheid rule
South Africa in the 1980s
- Anti-apartheid protest:
the formation of the racially integrated PASA, the formation of OASSSA, the formation of Psychology and Apartheid Committee - a ‘relevance’ debate in psychology:
Euro-American bias of the discipline, the marginalised experiences of the black majority, indifference to human rights abuses of the state
The ‘relevance’ debate in post-apartheid South Africa
- a white, middle-class, European/American, ethnocentric and coloniser worldview
- Silences around apartheid practices, race, class, gender etc. “and how these relate to issues like poverty, power, inequality and exploitation”
The current ‘relevance’ debate
- Theoretical issues: Euro-American bias
- Professional issues: race, language
- training issues: selection criteria and their operationalisation, selection panels
- research issues: sidelining of socio-eco issues, 2% of articles look at HIV/AIDS, 2% look at race
Why the apparent lack of progress?
Racist professionals
Cultural explanations
Institutional practices etc.
‘Relevance’ discourse in international psychology
1960s and 1970s:
- year of international protest
- vietnam war
- White racism
- Oppressive government
- Homophobia
- Nuclear proliferation
- Environmental degradation
- Gender oppression
American psychology in crisis
- the artifact crisis
- the ethics crisis
- the relevance crisis
European psychology in crisis
- student revolution
- American social psychology as ideological
- European social psychology as atheoretical
‘Third World’ psychology in crisis
Euro-American psychology is invalid
No credible alternative
The internationalization of relevance
Why won’t ‘relevance’ go away?
- failure to define psychology’s subject matter
- indecision about psychology’s cognitive interest
- The inevitable result of a disciplinary culture of scientism
- A consequent difficulty theorizing rapid social change
- Different conceptions of ‘relevance’
Defining ‘relevance’
social relevance: the discipline must contribute to human welfare
cultural relevance: afrocentrism and accessibility
market relevance:
the international benchmarking of disciplinary outputs
What is relevance? the trouble with assumptions…
Essentially, ‘relevance’ refers to the benefits psychology is thought to offer society.
Underlying talk of ‘relevance’ is the notion of the ‘public good’
BUT:
What is ‘good’?
Which ‘public’ is being referred to?
Why does talk of ‘relevance’ matter?
- Because language ‘does’ things
- Ways of speaking about ‘relevance’ explain the past lack of progress in the discipline and can ‘predict’ the future of the discipline
- How is the profession speaking about ‘relevance’ in the post-apartheid era?
- One way to investigate this would be to analyse addresses delivered at national psychology congresses.
Theo Veldsman (1996)
Market rationality:
“healthy growth”
“financial viability”
“key stakeholders”
“financial scenarios”
“vertical” and “horizontal” relationships
“service delivery”
“value adding working relationships”
“improvement in tariffs” “our clients” and “ourselves as service providers” (p. 6)
A need to find “the appropriate balance [between] looking after our own interests and satisfying the needs of those we have to serve”
Smangaliso Mkhatshwa (2000)
- a mix of social and market consciousness
“Psychology has a vital role to play in assisting government to understand the forces at play in our national psyche or, as the case may be, individual and group psyches” (p. 1)
Social and mental problems “negatively impact… on our ability as a country to compete in an increasingly globally-competitive environment” (ibid.)
Six years after our liberation, what are psychologists doing about minds and consciousnesses disfigured by our bloody past? I ask you.” (ibid.)