Relationships : Physical Attractiveness Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Outline the halo effect

A

The halo effect is the idea that people who are judged to be attractive are typically perceived in a positive light. For example, Dion et al. (1972) found that attractive people are consistently rated as successful, kind and sociable when compared with unattractive people. This means that we not only believe that good-looking people are more physically attractive, we expect them to have other desirable characteristics as well and tend to behave more positively towards them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Outline the matching hypothesis

A

In real life people also use common sense to estimate whether a prospective partner will find us attractive, and therefore they don’t automatically go for the most attractive person around, but choose a partner who matches their own level of physical attractiveness. This is referred to as the matching hypothesis.

According to the matching hypothesis, a person’s choice of partner is a balance between a desire to have the most physically attractive partner possible and their wish to avoid being rejected by someone who is ‘way out of their league’. As a result, people often settle for a partner who has roughly the same level of physical attractiveness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline research into the matching hypothesis

A

752 first-year students at the University of Minnesota were invited to attend a dance party. They were randomly matched to a partner; however, when students were picking up their tickets, they were secretly judged by a panel in terms of attractiveness. During the intervals at the dance party, and 4 to 6 months later, students were asked whether they found their partner attractive and whether they would like to go on a second date with them. Contrary to the matching hypothesis predictions, students expressed higher appreciation of their partner if the partner was attractive, regardless of their own level of attractiveness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Evaluate the matching hypothesis - dating websites

A

In addition to Walster et al.’s original study that failed to support the hypothesis, other research has also failed to provide conclusive evidence for matching hypothesis. For example, Taylor et al. (2011) investigated the activity log on a dating website and found that website users were more likely to try and arrange a meeting with a potential partner who was more physically attractive than them. These findings contradict the matching hypothesis, as according to its predictions, website users should seek more dates with a person who is similar in terms of attractiveness, because it provides them with a better chance of being accepted by a potential partner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evaluate the matching hypothesis - types of relationship

A

The matching hypothesis ignores the fact that people may compensate for the lack of physical attractiveness with other qualities, such as intellect or sociability. This compensation explains repeatedly occurring examples of older, less attractive men being married to attractive younger women; something that the matching hypothesis cannot account for.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly