Relationships Flashcards
(Sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour)
Inter-sexual selection
- Females make a greater investment of time and commitment during and after the birth of offspring
- This means she is more likely to select genetically fit fit partners who are able to provide resources
TRIVERS
(Sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour)
Inter-sexual selection - ‘sexy sons hypothesis’
- ‘Runaway process’
- Mating with male with desirable, ‘sexy’ characteristics means it will be inherited by her son
- Increases chances that new generations will mate with her son
FISHER
(Sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour AO3)
Anisogamy
- Survey of 10,000 adults in 33 countries
- Asked questions about age and attributes they look for
Females - Resource-related characteristics (financial prospects, ambition)
Males - Reproductive capacity (good looks, chastity, young)
Due to differences in sex cells
Buss
(Sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour AO3)
Inter-sexual selection - ‘choosiness’
- Psychology students approached other students and sexually propositioned them
- No females accepted but 75% of males did
Clarke and Hatfield
(Sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour AO3)
Ignores social influences
- Women’s greater role in the workplace means they are less dependent on men and are less likely to have mating preferences that involve resources
Bereczkei
(Sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour AO3)
Waist-hip ratio
- Generally find all hip or waist sizes attractive as long as the ratio of one to the other is about 0.7
- The combination of wider hips and a smaller waist is an ‘honest signal’ of fertility and a sign the woman is not pregnant
Singh
(Sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour AO3)
Supporting research - lonely hearts research
Women - offer indicators of young, attractiveness (flirty, curvy, sexy)
Men - Offered resources (successful, fit, mature, ambitious)
Waynforth and Dunbar
(Self-disclosure theory)
Social penetration theory
- Involves reciprocal exchange of information
- When one person discloses information they show trust, so the other should do the same
- As they disclose more they further ‘penetrate’ the other’s lives
ALTMAN AND TAYLOR
(Self-disclosure theory)
Reciprocity
- As well as breadth and depth, there must be reciprocity
- Partner should respond with empathy and understanding, and share information of their own
- Balance needed for successful relationships
REIS AND SHAVER
(Self-disclosure A03)
Research support
- Strong correlation between measures of satisfaction and self-disclosure in both partners
Sprecher and Hendrick
(Self-disclosure A03)
Cultural differences - sexual self-disclosure
- Men and women in the USA (individualist cultures) more likely to disclose sexual thoughts and preferences than in China (collectivist culture)
Tang
(Self-disclosure A03)
Relationship breakdown
- Disclosure involves intimate and honest conversation
- In relationship breakdown this can salvage a relationship or lead to breakup
Duck
(Physical attractiveness)
Evolutionary theory
- People with symmetrical faces are rated as more attractive
- It is an ‘honest signal’ of genetic fitness; it cannot be faked
SHACKLETON AND LARSEN
(Physically attractiveness)
The halo effect
- Physically attractive people consistently rated as strong, kind, sociable and successful compared to unattractive people
DION
(Physical attractiveness)
The matching hypothesis
- We ding the most attractive people desirable, but know we cannot necessarily date them
- We make a ‘compromise’ based on a value judgement about our own attractiveness and date people that we believe are of similar attractiveness
- Avoids rejection
WALSTER
(Physical attractiveness A03)
The matching hypothesis - dance
- Paired student randomly
- Pretty girls asked on second dates even if the boy was less attractive
Walster
(Physical attractiveness A03)
The matching hypothesis - photos
- 99 photos of real couples and randomly paired ones
- Real couples consistently rated as more alike in attractiveness
Murstein
(Physical attractiveness A03)
The matching hypothesis - dating website
- Analysed activity of 60 heterosexual users: ‘initators’
- Identifed people they sent messages to: ‘targets’
- Idea of matching had no influence on who was contacted
- Responses showed clear evidence of matching
Taylor
(Physical attractiveness A03)
The halo effect
- Less attractive people more likely to be convicted and receive an average 22 months longer sentence than unattractive people
- Seen as more trustworthy
Gunnell and Cici
(Physical attractiveness A03)
Individual differences - The macho scale
- Ppts asked how much they would like to pursue someone based on a photo and biological information
- Also completed macho scale questionnaire to assess sexist attitudes
- High scores more likely to target people based off of appearance
Towhey
(Physical attractiveness A03)
Cultural similarities
- Features such as small nose, large eyes, prominent cheekbones rated as attractive by white, black and hispanic males
Cunningham
(Filter theory)
Field of availables - field of desirables
- Social demography (accessibility)
- Similarity in attitudes (first 18 months)
- Complementarity (long-term)
KERCKHOFF AND DAVIS
(Filter theory A03)
Research support
- Similarity in personality, interests and attitudes between partners are typical in the early stages of relationships
Winch
(Filter theory A03)
Failure to replicate research
- Many studies have failed to replicate the findings of the original study
- May be due to social changes
Levinger