Relationships Flashcards

1
Q

Interpersonal Attraction

A

Attraction between people which leads to the development of platonic or romantic relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interpersonal relationships

A

Communication or relationships between two people

Social association and connection

Topic describes creation, sustenance and breaking up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sociobiological theory - evolutionary

A

Behaviours which support reproduction are naturally selected

Men = should seek young, fertile women
Women = should seek men with good genetics and resources

Research; Marshall (1981) 86% would be kidney donor for their kids, 67% parents, 50% siblings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Re-inforcement Effect Model

A

We are attracted to those who reward or re-in force us, dislike those who punish us

Rewards = love, money, status

Strength = Helps to explain the initial stages of attraction

Weakness = assumes people are selfish, more relevant to individualistic cultures

Research; Griffiths (1976) feelings scale experiment - positive feelings increase interpersonal attraction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Social Exchange Theory (Thibault and Kelley, 1959)

A

Economic approach, sees relationships like a business

Rewards = self-esteem, love, respect, stability
Costs = giving up time, loosing financial stability, stress

MIN/MAX PRINCIPLE; people want to minimise loss and maximise profit

Comparison Level; interpretation of how rewarding a relationship should be

Comparison Level with Alt; considering other people’s or previous relationships and if they could find someone of a higher benefit/ less cost

Evaluation = Limited, only heterosexual people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Equity Theory (Hatfield, 1979)

A

Extended SET putting more of an emphasis on fairness

Balance; both partners are equally satisfied

Over-benefits; guilty for their ‘lion share’

Under-benefits; feel resentful

Change to perspective; what is considered unfair may change, Hatfield (2011) later stages are less likely to keep score

Research; Utne et al (1984) self-report scales for recently married couples, 118 participants 16-45 aged

Findings; people are most satisfied when there relationships are equal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Proximity Effect

A

Proximity leads to increased chances of attraction stimuli - important for face to face relationships

Research; Festinger et al (1950) study on student university accommodation, most likely to be close with those who stay next door (41%) then with those two doors down and then end of the corridor (10%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Matching hypothesis

A

Walster et al (1966) ; people tend to be attracted to those who are equal to them in terms of attractiveness

Research; Murstein (1971) married partners often rated as being very similar in attractiveness levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Kelley (1959) Sampling Theory of Relationships

A

Sampling; partners consider possible costs/ benefits and compare to other options available

Bargaining; partners exchange costs and benefits through direct or indirect interactions

Commitment; relationship is stable, predictable exchange of costs and rewards

Institutionalisation; established costs and benefits, relationship settled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Social Exchange Theory

Rusbult (1983)

A

Aim = To explain why people remain in relationships

Procedure = Longitudinal questionnaire with 17 female and 17 male participants (heterosexual) questions about costs, benefits, investment and comparisons with alternatives

Findings = cost/ benefit applied to start less, considered more as relationship developed, alternatives became less attractive over time and as satisfaction increased so did commitment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Social Exchange Theory

Spreecher (2001)

A

Supports Rusbult

Findings = Comparison Levels for alternatives were a strong predictor of commitment in a relationship and that rewards were important for satisfaction, especially for women

Meaning people do weight up costs and rewards (SET theory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Filter theory

A

Kerckhoff and Davis (1962)

Aim = To study relationships and determine the criteria which people look to fill when selecting a potential partner

Procedure = Studied student couples (mainly short-term, had been together less than 18 months)

Findings = People are initially attracted to each other because they are similar. Sociodemographic characteristics; same class, age, proximity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Filter theory;

Sociodemographic characteristics
• First level

A

People are attracted to those who…
• Share sociodemographic characteristics
• Physical proximity
• Level of education
• Social class
• Religion
• Attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Filter theory;

Similarity of Attitudes
• Second level

A

People find people attractive who they share core values and beliefs with…

e.g. careers, family

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Filter theory;

Complimentary
• Third level

A

Refers to each partner having traits the other partner lacks

e.g one partner who is extroverted and one who is introverted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Filter Theory

Gruber-Baldini et al. (1995)

A

Procedure = Longitudinal study of couples aged 21

Findings = Those who were similar in education level and age at the start of the relationship were more likely to stay together and have a successful relationship

Supports importance of sociodemographic characteristics in relationships

17
Q

Filter Theory

Strengths

A

Backed up by Gruber- Baldini et al (1995)

Application to everyday relationships

18
Q

Filter Theory

Weaknesses

A

Psychologists have criticised Kerckhoff and Davis for their determination of ‘short term’ and ‘long term’ relationships - struggled to replicate

Anderson et al 2003; couples are not similar at start of the relationship but become more similar over time - questioning causality of Filter theory, affecting similarity filter

19
Q

Social Exchange Theory Strengths

A

As relationships enter the maintenance stage physical attraction becomes less important, SET/Equality explain this part of relationships accurately

20
Q

Social Exchange Theory Weaknesses

A

Assumes people are logical in calculating relationships, not everyone is e.g. people who begin abusive relationships

21
Q

Evaluation of Sociobiological Theory

A

Strength = Explains the natural need for affiliation between humans and how the human race progresses

Weakness = People don’t just get into relationships for reproduction e.g people who get married but don’t want children