Relationship between theory and methods Flashcards
Positivists tend to use quantitative, statistical methods such as
- the use of official statistics
- the experiment
- the comparative method
- social surveys
- structured questionnaires
- formal/structured interviews
- non-participant observation
Positivist view of society
- society is an objective reality made up of social structures/social facts independent of individuals
- individuals are constrained/moulded by external social forces
- sociologists should try to examine these social-structural constraints on behaviour with a macro or large-scale approach
Positivist theoretical perspective
- structural theories like functionalism or marxism examining how society moulds and controls individual behaviour
- structural theories adopt a macro approach, studying the role of social institutions in shaping behaviour
Positivist methodological approach
- sociology can and should study society using similar methods to those in the natural sciences
- may enable the discovery of causes of human behaviour and the predictions of future trends
- methods include using the hypothetico-deductive model to test theories and quantitative methods to collect empirical data
Positivist research methods to collect data
- quantitative and statistical methods applied with objectivity and detachment to collect empirical data - reliable and representative/generalisable
- use of statistics (primary or secondary) - representative, large-scale, reliable - rejected by interpretivists who suggest official statistics lack validity (a record of official decision making, labelling etc)
- experimental method (experiments or the comparative method) - comparative method most likely to be used as closest to natural science laboratory method
- large-scale sample surveys (structured questionnaires and structured interviews) - produce representative reliable quantitative data with personal detachment, objectivity and reduced interviewer bias - interpretivists see detachment as risking imposition problem and lacking verstehen
- non-participant observation - retains detachment and is possible to collect quantitative data by categorising observations
Criticisms of positivist approach
- interpretivists suggest methods don’t produce an accurate or valid picture of society
- detachment may lead to research lacking verstehen
- statistics produced or used are social constructions based on the views and interpretations of the people producing them - eg Atkinson suggests that suicide statistics are just a result of coroners’ decision-making
Interpretivists adopt an inductive approach
one which develops theories on the basis of evidence that has been collected
Glaser and Strauss (1967) refers to theory arising from an inductive approach as grounded theory
which arsis from analysis of data that has been collected
Interpretivists tend to adopt the verstehen approach suggested by
Weber
Interpretivist view of society
- society is a social construction and has no objective reality or existence independent of the interpretations people hold, as individuals construct society through free will and choice, based on interpretations which sociologists should try to understand using a micro approach
Interpretivist theoretical perspective
- social action or interpretivist theories like symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology focusing on how actions are based on people’s interpretations, studying interaction between individuals to discover meanings
Interpretivist methodological approach
- sociology is fundamentally different from the natural world and sociologists have to adopt verstehen to enable them to get insight into meanings and interpretations, building grounded theories using an inductive approach
Interpretivist research methods used to collect data
- qualitative methods aimed at being valid through involvement and empathy to understand meanings - verstehen
- newspapers, autobiographies, personal diaries etc - insight into views and opinions
- uncontrolled experiments (some field experiments) like Garfinkel’s breaching experiments enable the discovery of meanings
- unstructured/semi-structured open-ended questionnaires and interviews (inc group interviews) - building verstehen with participants avoids imposition problem but positivists argue this is not representative
- participant observation - enables verstehen producing valid and detailed accounts but positivists view this as unreliable
Examples of interpretivist methods
- use of personal accounts and documents (letters, diaries etc)
- unstructured/semi-structured open-ended questionnaires
- informal (unstructured/in-depth) interviews, focus groups and group interviews
- small-scale case studies of group interaction
- participant (sometimes non-participant) observation
Criticisms of interpretivist approaches
- main criticisms come from positivists
- lack of reliability and the subjective nature of their findings
- may be interviewer bias or the Hawthorne effect
- often not very representative (small-scale)