Relationship between branches Flashcards

1
Q

What are the three branches of government?

A
  • Legislature (Parliament)
  • Executive (PM, Cabinet, ministers, civil service)
  • Judiciary (judges)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the rule of law?

A

The principle that everyone, including the government, must follow the law and be held accountable if they don’t.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does parliamentary
sovereignty
mean?

A

Parliament can make or unmake any law. It cannot bind its successors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the difference
between legal and political
sovereignty
.

A

Legal sovereignty: formal power, usually where laws are made (Parliament)
Political sovereignty: Practical power, (usually governing party/cabinet/ prime minister)

(Parliament is not politically sovereign – it has legal right to make any law it wishes, but not always the political ability to do so)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Key features of the Supreme
Court

A
  • Highest court in UK.
  • Only Parliament can overturn decisions of Supreme Court by passing new legislation.
  • Made up of 12 senior judges who have extensive legal experience.
  • Set up by Constitutional Reform Act 2005 to replace previous system where the most senior judges, the law lords, sat in HOL.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Supreme Court appointment
process
.

A

Appointed by independent panel of senior legal figures so that it can be independent of political pressure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is judicial neutrality?
Why important? How is it
protected?

A
  • Judges should not be influenced by their personal opinions.
  • Rule of law demands everyone is treated equally, enhances independence, ensures public confidence.
  • Protected by: judges are not allowed to join political parties, cases are heard by at least 3, usually 5, judges, reasons for rulings are published, oath.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is judicial
independence
? Why
important? How is it
protected?

A
  • Judges should be free from political interference and criticism.
  • Prevents abuses of power and knee jerk reactions to public opinion.
  • Protected by: separation of powers, independent appointments process, security of tenure (appointed for life), independent pay body, sub judice rules.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ways in which Supreme
Court is influential
.

A
  • UK’s most senior court.
  • Its interpretation of the meaning of the law is final.
  • If it declares an Act of Parliament is incompatible with ECHR this places very strong moral/political pressure on Parliament to change the law.
  • SC determines the location of sovereignty in the UK
  • SC can declare when a public body has acted illegally by acting beyond its powers (ultra vires)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Judicial activism

A

Since HRA and CRA, the Supreme Court has become increasingly involved in political decisions (Art 50, prorogation, immigration, terrorism)

leading to criticism of judicial activism or political motivation. However, there have been criticisms from both sides of political spectrum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ways the Supreme
Court’s power/influence
is
limited.

A
  • Since UK Parliament is sovereign and in absence of an entrenched constitution, the Supreme Court cannot strike down an Act of Parliament. Government can choose to ignore statements of incompatibility.
  • Although the Supreme Court can quash the decision of a public body for acting beyond its authority, Parliament could then legislative to give that body the legal powers it did not have before.
  • Supreme Court cannot initiate cases.
  • The elected branches passed HRA, CRA and devolution acts. SC is just delivering on the role it was set by Parliament in those laws. Moreover, none of them are entrenched, so its powers can be curtailed by Parliament at any time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is meant by an ‘elective
dictatorship
’?

A

The idea, first expressed by Lord Hailsham in 1976, that if the governing party enjoys a parliamentary majority, it is able to drive through any legislation it wishes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ways Parliament can
constrain the Executive
.

A
  • Power to dismiss a government in a vote of no confidence.
  • HOC can veto legislation.
  • HOL can delay legislation by a year.
  • Can amend legislation.
  • Vocal opposition/ backbench rebellion.
  • Scrutiny by departmental select committees, liaison committee and parliamentary questions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ways Executive can
control Parliament
.

A
  • Fusion of powers: Government usually has a majority in the Commons as well as a large payroll vote, can therefore expect to win every important vote.
  • Promise of jobs/ threat of sanctions used by whips to ensure loyalty.
  • Government controls timetabling for legislation, limiting time for debate.
  • HOL’s powers are limited and it lacks legitimacy to challenge HOC
  • Can delay but not veto.
  • Cannot vote on budget.
  • Salisbury Convention means HOL cannot block manifesto commitments.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How has the relationship between Executive and Parliament changed in recent years?

A
  • Constitutional reforms: election of select committee chairs and members has reduced patronage power of whips and increased effective scrutiny; Backbench Business Committee increased time available for non-govt business (eg debate on Petitions such as Esther Ransome’s on assisted dying April 2024); Liaison Committee detailed scrutiny of PM 3x a year. Also Speakers have increasingly allowed Urgent Questions.
  • Coalition: minority and small majorities (reliance on Confidence and Supply agreement with DUP) 2010-19
  • Covid pandemic: emergency powers often relying on secondary legislation (Speaker called this ‘a total disregard for the House’)
  • Brexit: parties deeply divided, public view (as expressed in referendum) different to Parliament’s, Supreme Court rulings on Article 50 and Prorogation, use of secondary legislation to retain, repeal or amend retained European legislaton.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Arguments for/against Brexit

A
  • For: undemocratic and unaccountable institutions; too much ‘red tape’; loss of sovereignty; UK contributed more financially than it received; free
    movement of people meant too many immigrants and pressure on public services and jobs.
  • Against: EU prevents armed conflict in Europe and makes Europe stronger against external threats (Russia, climate change); free trade promotes economic growth; huge market for UK goods; cultural exchange and diversity; equalise economic development across UK and Europe.
17
Q

Political impact of UK’s
decision to leave EU?

A
  • Revealed/deepened divides within the country (young/old, cities/countryside, wealthy/poor, England/Scotland)
  • Reshaped voting behaviour and party support
  • Shift from focus on economic factors to focus on identity and migration.
18
Q

Constitutional impact of UK’s
decision to leave EU?

A
  • Restored parliamentary sovereignty (BUT retained laws, northern Ireland, levelling playing provisions in trade agreement says otherwises)
  • Highlighted the tensions between representative democracy and use of referenda on constitutional issues
  • ECJ no longer has jurisdiction (except NI)
  • Threatened the Union (Scotland and NI voted remain, inependence referendum in Scotland)
  • Increased power of Executive (eg use of SIs to retain, amend or repeal 1000s of retained European laws)
  • Clashes with the Supreme Court undermined public confidence.
19
Q

Ways parliament can be
seen as sovereign
.

A
  • Important to** make distinction between legal sovereignty and political sovereignty**.
  • Brexit means it can be argued that UK Parliament once again enjoys full legal sovereignty. BUT not in NI and the process for dealing with retained European laws (secondary legislation before end 2026) means the powers have been returned to executive rather than parliament. Moreover, because of fusion of powers, doesn’t usually have full political sovereignty.
  • Political sovereignty is not fixed and especially when governing party has a small or non-existent majority, parliament can assert its sovereignty (2019 Parliament voted to take over its agenda using Standing Order 24 to allow it to initiate its own votes on Brexit).
  • Despite devolution, Parliament retains reserved powers and Sewel Convention is not legally binding (SC ruling in 2017 that devolved bodies could not reject what parliament passed in relation to Brexit)
20
Q

Ways parliamentary
sovereignty
has been
challenged
in recent years.

A
  • EU membership still impacts NI and many of the powers returning to the UK as a result of Brexit will not be subject to parliamentary scrutiny but will be decided on by ministers as SIs.
  • Increased use of referenda can be seen as a de facto transfer of power to the people: ¾ MPs opposed Brexit, but HOC voted 498 to 114 to allow government to open Brexit negotiations because of the Referendum result.
  • Devolution (especially since 2015 and 2017 Acts)
  • HRA and Supreme Court (but Parliament could amend or remove the HRA and can decide how to respond to SC rulings).
  • Political sovereignty, now as in the past, rests with the governing party, cabinet and PM.
21
Q

Votes for prisoners?

A

2005 ECtHR ruled that the blanket ban on prisoner voting was a contravention of ECHR.
But Parliament came out strongly in favour of status quo and ban has largely remained in place (Backbench Business Debate in 2011, 234 votes to 22.) with some minor changes that have satisfied the ECtHR and led them to close the case in 2018.

(The main change was to make administrative changes which allowed prisoners released on temporary licence to vote).

Supreme Court dismissed two prisoner appeals in 2013.