REG 7 Flashcards
(150 cards)
In 2014, Best Corp., an accrual-basis calendar year C corporation, received $100,000 in dividend income from the common stock that it held in an unrelated domestic corporation.
The stock was not debt-financed, and was held for over a year. Best recorded the following information for 2014:
Loss from Best’s operations ($ 10,000)
Dividends received 100,000
Taxable income (before dividends-received deduction) $ 90,000
========
Best’s dividends-received deduction on its 2014 tax return was
If a C corporation owns less than 20 percent of a domestic corporation, 70 percent of dividends received or accrued from the corporation may be deducted.
A C corporation owning 20 percent or more but less than 80 percent of a domestic corporation may deduct 80 percent of the dividends received or accrued from the corporation. Similarly, C corporation owning 80 percent or more of a domestic corporation may deduct 100 percent of the dividends received or accrued from the corporation. However, the dividend received deduction is limited to a percentage of the taxable income of the corporation, unless the corporation sustains a net operating loss. If the corporation has a net operating loss, the dividend received deduction may be taken without limiting the deduction to a percentage of the corporation’s taxable income.
This response (63’000) uses the correct deduction percentage for Best Corp.’s ownership percentage and correctly limits the dividend received deduction to a percentage of the corporation’s taxable income. The limit is calculated by multiplying taxable income (before the dividend received deduction), i.e., $90,000, by the correct dividend received deduction percentage, i.e., 70 percent.
Tapper Corp., an accrual basis calendar year corporation, was organized on January 2, 2014. During 2014, revenue was exclusively from sales proceeds and interest income.
The following information pertains to Tapper:
Taxable income before charitable contributions for the year ended December 31, 2014 $500,000
Tapper’s matching contribution to employee-designated qualified universities made during 2014 10,000
Board of Directors’ authorized contribution to a qualified charity (authorized December 1, 2014, made February 1, 2015) 30,000
What is the maximum allowable deduction that Tapper may take as a charitable contribution on its tax return for the year ended December 31, 2014?
A corporation’s charitable contributions are deductible in the tax year paid, subject to a 10 percent of taxable income limitation. For the charitable contributions deduction, taxable income is calculated absent deductions for charitable contributions, dividends received, net operating losses and capital loss carrybacks.
Hence, Tapper Corp.’s charitable contributions would be limited to 10 percent of its $500,000 in taxable income before the charitable contributions deduction or $50,000. However, Tapper Corp. would not be subject to the limitation and may only deduct $40,000 because it only has $40,000 in contributions to charitable contributions. Tapper Corp. may deduct the employee-designated charities as the employees are viewed as performing only an administrative duty.
For year 2, Quest Corp., an accrual-basis calendar-year C corporation, had an $8,000 unexpired charitable contribution carryover from year 1. Quest’s year 2 taxable income before the deduction for charitable contributions was $200,000. On December 12, year 2, Quest’s board of directors authorized a $15,000 cash contribution to a qualified charity, which was made on January 6, year 3. What is the maximum allowable deduction that Quest may take as a charitable contribution on its year 2 income tax return?
Charitable contributions are limited to 10% of taxable income before the charitable contribution deduction, which is $20,000 ($200,000 x 10%). Total contributions are $15,000 + $8,000 = $23,000. The deduction is limited to $20,000 and $3,000 of the contribution from Year 1 is carried forward to Year 3.
Robin, a C corporation, had revenues of $200,000 and operating expenses of $75,000. Robin also received a $20,000 dividend from a domestic corporation and is entitled to a $14,000 dividend-received deduction. Robin donated $15,000 to a qualified charitable organization in the current year. What is Robin’s contribution deduction?
Taxable income before dividends and contributions is $125,000 ($200,000 - $75,000). The 10% of taxable income limitation for C corporations uses taxable income BEFORE the dividends received deduction, which is $145,000. Thus, the charitable contribution limitation is $14,500 ($145,000 x 10%).
Taxable income before dividends $125,000
Dividends 20,000
Taxable income before special deductions $145,000
Charitable contributions (14,500)
Taxable income after charitable deduction $130.500
Dividends-received deduction (14,000)
Taxable income $116,500
John Budd is the sole stockholder of Ral Corp., an accrual basis taxpayer engaged in wholesaling operations.
Ral’s retained earnings at January 1, 2014 amounted to $1,000,000.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, Ral’s book income, before federal income tax, was $300,000.
Included in the computation of this $300,000 were the following:
Dividends received on 500 shares of stock of a taxable domestic corporation that had 1,000,000 shares of stock outstanding (Ral had no portfolio indebtedness) $ 1,000
Loss on sale of investment in stock of unaffiliated corporation (this stock had been held for two years; Ral had no other capital gains or losses) (5,000)
Keyman insurance premiums paid on Budd’s life (Ral is the beneficiary of this policy) 3,000
Group term insurance premiums paid on $10,000 life insurance policies for each of Ral’s four employees (the employees’ spouses are the beneficiaries) 4,000
Amortization of cost of acquiring a perpetual dealer’s franchise (Ral paid $48,000 for this franchise on July 1, 2014, and is amortizing it over a 48-month period) 6,000
Contribution to a recognized, qualified charity (this contribution was authorized by Ral’s board of directors in December 2013, to be paid on January 31, 2014) 75,000
On December 1, 2014, Ral received advance rental of $27,000 from a tenant for a three-year lease commencing January 1, 2015 to cover rents for the years 2015, 2016, and 2017. In conformity with GAAP, Ral did not include any part of this rental in its income statement for the year ended December 31, 2014.
What portion of the dividend revenue should be included in Ral’s 2014 taxable income?
Since Ral Corp. owns less than 20 percent of the domestic corporation that paid the dividends (500 shares of 1,000,000 total shares), it may take a 70 percent dividend received deduction for the dividends.
Hence, Ral Corp. would include $300 of its dividend revenue in its taxable income. If Ral Corp. owned 20 or more but less than 80 percent of the domestic corporation, it could have deducted 80 percent of the dividends. Similarly, if 80 percent or more of the corporation was owned, 100 percent of the dividends would be deductible. Thus, this response is correct.
When a corporation’s charitable contributions exceed the limitation for deductibility in a particular year (i.e., 10 percent of taxable income for the year), how may the excess be treated?
When a corporation’s charitable contributions exceed the limitation for deductibility in a particular year (i.e., 10 percent of taxable income for the year), the excess may be carried over and deducted for five years.
Widget Corporation was formed in Year 1. Gross receipts for its first four years of operations are as follows
Year 1 $6,000,000
Year 2 $7,000,000
Year 3 $5,000,000
Year 4 $4,000,000
For each year, is Widget Corporation exempt from the AMT under the small corporation exemption?
In the first year of a corporation’s existence it is automatically exempt from the AMT (Yes). Widget’s first testing window to determine if it is subject to the AMT in Year 2 is just Year 1 gross receipts of $6,000,000. Since this exceeds the $5,000,000 threshold for the first three-year testing window (or portion thereof), Widget is NOT exempt from the AMT in Year 2. Once the small corporation exemption test is failed, then the corporation is NOT exempt for all future tax years, so the answer is NO for Years 3 and 4 also.
What does The AMT prevent taxpayers with significant income to?
The amount that the tentative minimum tax exceeds the regular tax is the alternative minimum tax (AMT). This tax was enacted to ensure that taxpayers cannot avoid their fair share of the tax burden. The AMT prevents taxpayers with significant income from avoiding a similar tax liability. The AMT is payable in addition to the regular tax.
Rona Corp.’s 2014 alternative minimum taxable income was $200,000.
The exempt portion of Rona’s 2014 alternative minimum taxable income was
When computing alternative minimum taxable income, corporations may take an exemption of $40,000 minus 25 percent of alternative minimum taxable income exceeding $150,000.
Thus, this exemption is equal to zero when alternative minimum taxable income is equal to or exceeds $310,000.
Rona Corp.’s exempt portion of its 2014 alternative minimum taxable income was $27,500 = $40,000 - [25 percent * ($200,000 - $150,000)].
Tan Corporation calculated the following taxes for the year:
Regular tax liability $210,000
Tentative minimum tax 240,000
Personal Holding Company Tax 65,000
What is Tan’s total tax liability for the year?
A corporation must pay the alternative minimum tax (AMT) to the extent that the tentative minimum tax liability exceeds the regular tax liability. Therefore, Tan must pay an AMT of $30,000 ($240,000 - $210,000) in addition to the regular tax liability of $210,000. The personal holding company tax is an excise tax that penalizes companies who have excess investment income. The $65,000 PHC tax is in addition to the regular tax.
The total tax liability is $305,000 ($210,000 + $30,000 + $65,000).
Kari Corp., a manufacturing company, was organized on January 2, 2014. Its 2014 federal taxable income was $400,000 and its federal income tax was $100,000.
What is the maximum amount of accumulated taxable income that may be subject to the accumulated earnings tax for 2014 if Kari takes only the minimum accumulated earnings credit?
The accumulated earnings tax is a penalty tax imposed on corporations that accumulates earnings and profits for the purpose of avoiding income tax for its shareholders. The accumulated earnings tax is equivalent to 15 percent of the corporation’s accumulated taxable income.
Accumulated taxable income is composed of taxable income adjusted downward for federal income and excess profits taxes, charitable deduction in excess of the ceiling, net capital gains and losses, and taxes of foreign countries and U.S. possessions and upward for certain corporate deductions, net operating loss deduction and capital loss carryback or carryover.
When calculating the accumulated earnings tax, corporations are given a credit, the accumulated earnings credit, of $250,000 ($150,000 for certain service corporations) plus dividends paid within the first 2 1/2 months of the corporation’s tax year less accumulated earnings and profits at the end of the preceding tax year.
Hence, the maximum amount of accumulated taxable income that may be subject to the accumulated earnings tax for 2014 if Kari Corp. takes only the minimum accumulated earnings credit is $50,000. This amount is composed of $400,000 in taxable income less both a downward adjustment of $100,000 for federal income taxes and the $250,000 accumulated earnings credit.
Acme Corp. has two common stockholders. Acme derives all of its income from investments in stocks and securities, and it regularly distributes 51% of its taxable income as dividends to its stockholders. Acme is a
Domestic and foreign corporations satisfying the personal holding company stock ownership and income tests are personal holding companies. The stock ownership test is satisfied if, at some time during the corporation’s tax year, 50 percent or more of the corporation’s stock was directly or indirectly owned by five or fewer individuals. Acme Corp. only has two shareholders, satisfying the stock ownership test.
The income test is satisfied if 60 percent or more of the corporation’s adjusted ordinary gross income is personal holding company income. Personal holding company income consists of: dividends; interest; annuities; rents; mineral, oil and gas royalties; copyright and patent royalties; produced film rents; compensation for more than 25 percent use of corporate property by shareholders; amounts received under personal services contracts; and amounts received from estates and trusts.
Since all of Acme Corp.’s income comes from investments, all of the corporation’s income is considered personal holding company income and, as a result, the corporation satisfies the income test.
Since Acme Corp. satisfies the stock ownership and income tests, it is a personal holding company.
The accumulated earnings tax can be imposed
The accumulated earnings tax is a tax imposed on corporations that accumulate earnings beyond reasonable amount. This tax was imposed to prevent corporations from accumulating earnings and profits with the purpose of avoiding income tax on its shareholders.
Any corporation accumulating earnings beyond the point of reasonable needs of the business is considered to have accumulated the earnings for the tax benefit of its shareholders, unless a preponderance of the evidence indicates otherwise. Only the shareholders of closely-held corporations would tend to have the power to retain corporate earnings for their benefit. As a result, the accumulated earnings tax tends to be applied more often to closely-held corporations.
However, the number of shareholders in a corporation is not a determining factor in imposing the tax. Hence, the accumulated earnings tax may be applied regardless of the number of shareholders in a corporation.
Zero Corp. is an investment company authorized to issue only common stock.
During the last half of 2014, Edwards owned 450 of the 1,000 outstanding shares of stock in Zero. Another 350 shares of stock outstanding were owned, 10 shares each, by 35 shareholders who are neither related to each other nor to Edwards.
Zero could be a personal holding company if the remaining 200 shares of common stock were owned by
Domestic and foreign corporations satisfying the personal holding company stock ownership and income tests are personal holding companies. As such, the corporation will be subject a 15 percent penalty tax on undistributed personal holding company income. The stock ownership test is satisfied if, at some time during the corporation’s tax year, 50 percent or more of the corporation’s stock was directly or indirectly owned by five or fewer individuals.
An individual indirectly owns stock if it is owned by the individual’s family or partner. Family includes the individual’s brothers, sisters, spouse and lineal descendants and ancestors. An individual will not be considered to be the constructive owner of the stock owned by nephews, cousins, uncles, aunts, and any of his/hers spouses relatives. Constructive ownership also may exist if the individual is a partner in a partnership or the beneficiary of an estate that is a shareholder. The income test is satisfied if 60 percent or more of the corporation’s adjusted ordinary gross income is personal holding company income.
With 450 shares, Edwards already directly owns 45 percent of Zero Corp.’s outstanding stock. If an estate where Edwards is the beneficiary owns the remainder of the corporation’s 200 shares of stock, Edwards would directly or indirectly own 65 percent of the corporation. An ownership exceeding the 50 percent direct or indirect ownership percentage is needed to satisfy the stock ownership test.
Hence, Zero Corp. could be a personal holding company if the remaining 200 shares were owned by an estate where Edwards is the beneficiary. Each response given to this question satisfies the stock ownership test for a personal holding company because, in each response, 5 or fewer individuals would own more than 50 percent of the corporation’s stock. However, this response is the best as it concentrates over 50 percent ownership under the control of one individual.
ParentCo, SubOne, and SubTwo have filed consolidated returns since their inception. The members reported the following taxable incomes (losses) for the year:
ParentCo $50,000
SubOne (60,000)
SubTwo (40,000)
No member reported a capital gain or loss or charitable contributions. What is the amount of the consolidated net operating loss?
On the consolidated tax return the income and losses of all the corporations are netted. Therefore, the net loss for the year is $50,000 ($100,000 of losses less $50,000 of income from ParentCo).
Bank Corp. owns 80% of Shore Corp.’s outstanding capital stock. Shore’s capital stock consists of 50,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Shore’s 2014 net income was $140,000. During 2014, Shore declared and paid dividends of $60,000.
In conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, Bank recorded the following entries in 2014:
Debit Credit Investment in Shore Corp. common stock $112,000 Equity in earnings of subsidiary $112,000 Cash 48,000 Investment in Shore Corp. common stock 48,000
In its 2014 consolidated tax return, Bank should report dividend revenue of
Bank Corp. should not report any dividend income from the Shore Corp.’s dividends. The corporations qualify as members of an affiliated group because Bank Corp. owns at least 80 percent of Shore Corp.’s total voting stock and 80 percent of the value of its stock. As Bank and Shore Corps. have done in this question, affiliated groups may file a consolidated tax return. The primary advantages are that: 1) intercompany dividends are excludable from taxable income; 2) losses of one affiliated member offset gains of another member; and 3) intercompany profits are deferred until realized. The journal entries are to eliminate the intercompany dividends and adjust the investment account for the consolidation process. There are certain tax advantages of filing a consolidated return.
Since the Bank and Shore Corps. are members of an affiliated group and, as a result, may file a consolidated return, the intercompany dividends are excluded from taxable income. This response correctly indicates that the dividends would be a nontaxable event.
Jans, an individual, owns 80% and 100% of the total value and voting power of A and B Corps., which in turn own the following (both value and voting power):
Ownership Property A Corp B Corp C Corp 80% - D Corp - 100%
All companies are C corporations except B Corp., which had elected S status since inception. Which of the following statements is correct with respect to the companies’ ability to file a consolidated return?
A and C are an affiliated group because A owns at least 80% of C and A is the parent company. B and D may not file a consolidated return because S corporations are not eligible to be in an affiliated group.
In 2014, Portal Corp. received $100,000 in dividends from Sal Corp., its 80%-owned subsidiary.
What net amount of dividend income should Portal include in its 2014 consolidated tax return?
A C corporation owning 80 percent or more of a domestic corporation may deduct 100 percent of the dividends received or accrued from the corporation. Owning 20 percent but less than 80 percent of a domestic corporation allows for an 80 percent deduction of dividends received or accrued from the corporation. An ownership percentage of less than 20 percent leads to a deduction of 70 percent of the dividends received. However, the dividend received deduction is limited to a percentage of the corporation’s taxable income, unless the corporation sustains a net operating loss. If the corporation has a net operating loss, the dividend received deduction may be taken without limiting the deduction to a percentage of the corporation’s taxable income.
Since Portal Corp. owns 80 percent of Sal Corp., Portal Corp. may deduct all of the dividends received from Sal Corp. and, as a result, have no dividend income.
Tech Corp. files a consolidated return with its wholly-owned subsidiary, Dow Corp. During 2014, Dow paid a cash dividend of $20,000 to Tech.
What amount of this dividend is taxable on the 2014 consolidated return?
When filing a consolidated return the intercompany dividends between the parent and its subsidiaries are not taxable. To be permitted to file a consolidated return, the parent and its subsidiaries must be members of an affiliated group.
Corporations qualify as members of an affiliated group by having a common parent that directly owns at least 80 percent of the total voting stock and at least 80 percent of the total value of the stock in at least one other includible corporation. In addition, a minimum of one of the other includible corporations must own at least 80 percent in each of the remaining includible corporations. The primary advantages of filing a consolidated return are that:
1) intercompany dividends are excludable from taxable income;
2) losses of one affiliated member offset gains of another member; and
3) intercompany profits are deferred until realized.
What is derivative suit
derivative suit is when the shareholder is suing on behalf of the corporation.
Under the Secured Transactions Article of the UCC, is a secured party required to assign its security interest?
Under the Secured Transactions Article of the UCC, a secured party is not required to assign its security interest. The security interest is the right of the secured party, not the debtor, thus the debtor has no right to tell the secured party what to do with its security interest.
Sheri received jewelry as a gift from her aunt, Amy. At the time of the gift, the jewelry had a fair market value of $54,000 and an adjusted basis of $19,000. This was the only gift that Sheri received from Amy during 2014. If Amy paid a gift tax of $8,000 on the transfer of the gift to Sheri, what tax basis will Sheri have for the jewelry?
This answer is correct. A donee’s basis for gift property is generally the same as the donor’s basis, increased by any gift tax paid that is attributable to the property’s net appreciation in value. The amount of gift tax that can be added is limited to the amount that bears the same ratio as the property’s net appreciation bears to the amount of taxable gift. For this purpose, the amount of gift is reduced by the $14,000 annual exclusion that is allowable with respect to the gift. Thus, Sheri’s basis is $19,000 + [$8,000 ($54,000 ? $19,000) / ($54,000 ? $14,000)] = $26,000.
How is called a partnership without specified duration?
partnership at will is used to describe a partnership without a specified duration
What happens when the only general partner withdraw?
the withdrawal of the only general partner will dissolve the partnership.