Reflexivity and Positioning Flashcards
Define:
Positioning
(According to Qualitative Psychological Research)
Our role as researchers in relation to our work/study.
This takes into account things such as…
- Values
- Beliefs
- Assumptions
…and how these may influence the research!
True or False:
‘Who we are informs the knowledge we produce’.
True
(According to a Qualitative paradigm)
Our unique personal attributes inform our the paradigm/methodologies selected and underpinning our research.
What are FOUR examples of broad categories that make up who we are?
- Location
- Demographics
- Beliefs/Values
- Relationships
These ultimately are contextual - we have ‘different selves’ for different contexts.
Define:
Insider
(In a research context)
Being a member of a studied group.
Note: we all have insider and outsider aspects, even when we may intially seem to be a member of a group.
(e.g. from the same community, but not necessarily the same ethnical background, generation etc.).
Also, researchers typically have greater power within the research, so it is hard to be a complete insider within your study.
Define:
Outsider
(In a research context)
Not being a member of a studied group.
Note: we all have insider and outsider aspects though, and some meaningful commonality will likely exist between the researcher and participants.
Define:
Insider-Outsider
(In a research context)
A status acknowledging the non-binary aspects of group membership and commonality between researchers and participants.
This more accurately denotes the spectrum between the two extremes of insider vs. outsider.
What key issue does the following quote outline?
Majority group members speaking on behalf of, or silencing, minorities through their research.
Explain:
The meaning of ‘working the hyphen’.
(In regards to ‘insider-outsiders’).
Acknowledging that we have…
- Different identities in different contexts.
- Aspects of ‘majority’ & ‘minority’ groups in our identity.
And keeping all of these facets in mind when conducting/designing our research!
Describe:
TWO key issues of not conducting studies involving groups of which you are an outsider to.
(According to PSYC232 course).
“Is my greatest contribution to move over and get out of the way?”
- Potentially reinforces any current power imbalances/the status quo.
- Places a greater burden on disadvantaged/minority groups to make their voices heard.
True or False:
Researchers are part of a study’s ‘toolset’.
True
Each individual brings a unique dimensionality to their work/study.
What is the main purpose of the article: ‘The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research’?
To weigh the pros & cons of having an insider and/or outsider status with the groups you are studying.
Describe:
ONE major assumption an ‘insider’ reasearcher needs to overcome in their work.
That they already have ‘full knowledge’ on the topics/experiences.
Instead, they should approach carefully and ‘assume ignorance’, as they might not be a part of specific subcultures etc.
Moreover, we are all individuals and so being in the same demographic does not equate to having the exact same experiences/perspectives.
List:
THREE types of membership roles in observational research.
- Non-Participant of core-group member activities.
- Involved in central activities, but not committed to values/goals.
- Complete membership/full affiliation achieved via research.
True or False:
If you are an insider of your studied group, you cannot learn any new or meaningful things about shared experiences.
False
Ultimately, we are all unique individuals, and so even if we are ‘members’ of the same ‘groups’, not two peoples’ experiences will be exactly identical.
True or False:
Being an insider inherently makes your research of the studied group better.
False
It can positively contribute to different aspects of the research, but only when the researcher incorporates a clear understanding of positioning and reflexivity.
Same applies for being an outsider!