Reconstructive memory Flashcards
What is Reconstructive Memory according to Bartlett (1932)?
- Reconstructive memory suggests that memory is not a perfect recording of events, but rather an active process. We reconstruct memories using existing schemas (mental frameworks) based on prior knowledge, culture, and expectations. This means our memories can become distorted or inaccurate.
What are schemas in Reconstructive Memory?
- Schemas are pockets of information built from past experiences and knowledge.
- They help us interpret and understand the world, but they can also fill in gaps in our memory, sometimes leading to false or altered memories during recall.
What was the aim of Bartlett’s “War of the Ghosts” study?
- Bartlett aimed to investigate how memory is reconstructed when recalling an unfamiliar story, and to see whether people’s memories would be influenced by their own cultural expectations and schemas.
What was the procedure of Bartlett’s (1932) “War of the Ghosts” study?
- British participants read a Native American folk tale called The War of the Ghosts, which included unfamiliar concepts (e.g., spirits, seal hunting).
- Bartlett used serial reproduction (retelling the story to another person like Chinese whispers) and repeated reproduction (recalling it over intervals from minutes to months).
What were the findings of Bartlett’s study?
- Participants’ recollections were shorter, more coherent, and conformed to their cultural expectations.
- Key details were often changed, such as “canoes” becoming “boats” or “seals” being forgotten.
- This showed distortions caused by schemas.
What was Bartlett’s conclusion?
- Bartlett concluded that memory is reconstructive, and people use their schemas to interpret and reshape what they remember.
- Memories are not exact copies but reconstructions influenced by personal and cultural context.
How does Reconstructive Memory explain forgetting and distortion?
- We forget or distort information when it doesn’t fit our schemas, or when we fill in memory gaps with expectations or guesses.
- This can lead to inaccurate recall, especially for unfamiliar or culturally strange information.
Evidence
P- A strength of Bartlett’s theory is that it is supported by his own “War of the Ghosts” study.
E- Participants changed unfamiliar story elements to fit their own culture and schemas.“Canoes” became “boats”; supernatural elements were often omitted.
E- This supports the idea that memories are not exact but are reconstructed using existing knowledge.
Application
P- A strength is that it has real-world applications, it helps us understand why eyewitness testimony can be unreliable.
E- If people reconstruct memories based on schemas, they may misremember key details in crimes.
E- This has influenced how police conduct interviews, such as using cognitive interviews to reduce bias.
Credibility / Comparison
P- A weakness is that Bartlett’s research lacks scientific credibility.His methods were uncontrolled and lacked standardisation.
E- He didn’t use a standard scoring system, and instructions weren’t consistent across participants.
E- This reduces the reliability and objectivity of the findings.
CP- However, his use of naturalistic stories improves ecological validity.
How good is the research
P- A criticism is that the theory is too descriptive and vague. It doesn’t clearly explain the processes involved in memory reconstruction
E- It uses the concept of “schemas” without fully detailing how or when they’re applied.
E- This makes it difficult to test or falsify the theory scientifically.
Comparison
P- Other theories, like the Multi-Store Model (MSM) or Working Memory Model (WMM), challenge Bartlett. These models explain memory in terms of distinct stores and processes.
E- The MSM outlines rehearsal and transfer to LTM, and WMM explains STM processing.
E- These theories are more structured and testable than Bartlett’s, suggesting that Reconstructive Memory may lack precision.
