recognition of judgments Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what are the 2 testing areas

A

1) recognition of judgments

2) choice of law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the state called that is handing down the judgment

A

rendered state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the state called upon to recognize and enforce a judgment called

A

recognized state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what clause in const forces STATES to recognize judgments from other states

A

full faith and credit clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what clause in const force states to recognize federal judgments

A

supremacy clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the threshold recognition of a sister state enforcement

A

is it entitled to full faith and credit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the 2 steps for full faith and credit clause

A

1) are the 3 full faith and credit requirements satisified

2) are there any good defenses to full faith and credit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the 3 requirements for the full faith and credit clause

A

1) JURISDICTION must have been proper in rendering state (SMJ and PJ)
2) judgment must be on the MERITS and
3) be A FINAL JUDGMENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how many chances does a D get to contest jurisdiction

A

only ONE CHANCE

  • a party can contest jurisdiction in the rendering court proceedings OR
    2) they can wait and contest the rendering court’s jurisdiction in the recognizing state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

are default judgments on the merits

A

YES.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how are the full faith and credit requirements evaluated

A

according the the rendering states law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

is the full faith and credit requirements evaluated by the rendering states laws or recognition states

A

rendering states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

does an enforcement judgment need PJ

A

NOOO. just follow the assets

- in pure enforcement action dont need PJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the 2 good defenses against PJ

A

1) judgment is criminal (punishes an offense against the public)
2) judgment was procured by EXTRINSIC fraud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how to conclude a judgment is criminal/ penal,

A

prosecuting party must be the state. If a private person is the P, the judgment is not penal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is extrinsic fraud for a good defense against FFandC

A

fundamental fraud. Cannot be dealt with right away
ex: bribing the judge
- intrinsic fraud is not a good defense: if fraud could have been dealt with during the earlier trial within the regular workings of the judicial system it is intrinsic fraud
ex intrinsic: perjury

17
Q

bad defense (do not work) for against full faith and credit

A

1) judgment is contrary to the recognizing states public policy
2) mistakes of law and/or fact were made
- the wrong procedural route has been selected. If such mistakes were made they should have been appealed in the rendering state’s court system

18
Q

what is it called to recognize a foreign countries judgment

A

comity

19
Q

are foreign country judgments entitled to full faith and credit

A

NO. only comity

20
Q

what is comity of a foreign country judgment

A

a state MAY voluntary choose to recognize a foreign judgment, however as a matter of comity

  • the recognizing court will specifically look to see if FAIRNESS standards have been stratified in both terms
    1) W/E PERSONAL JURISDICTION was proper (minimum sufficient contacts)
    2) W/E FAIR PROCEDURES were used during earlier litigation
21
Q

when will a state recognize a foreign countries judgment (comity)

A

the recognizing court will specifically look to see if FAIRNESS standards have been stratified in both terms

1) W/E PERSONAL JURISDICTION was proper (minimum sufficient contacts)
2) W/E FAIR PROCEDURES were used during earlier litigation
- w/e allowed to bring evidence, testify, etc