Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

A2 Law - Mens Rea > Recklessness > Flashcards

Recklessness Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

When the offence required recklessness, what does the prosecution need to prove?

A

That the defendant took and unjustified risk knowing that a prohibited risk may happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is recklessness?

A

When the defendant took an unjustifiable risk knowing a prohibited result may happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When was the first use of the phrase ‘subjective recklessness’?

A

R v Cunningham (1957)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the case of R v Cunningham (1957) relevant to?

A

The first use of the phrase subjective recklessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case happened in 1957?

A

R v Cunningham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In what year did the case of R v Cunningham happen?

A

1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happened in the case of R v Cunningham (1957)?

A

The defendant pulled a gas meter from a wall to steal some money and some gas seeped through to next door and made his future mother in law very ill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the outcome of R v Cunningham (1957)?

A

He was charged with ‘maliciously administering a noxious thing so as to endanger life’ under s23 of the offences against a persons act 1861. The court of appeal held that ‘malicious’ could mean intentionally or recklessly, but the defendant did not have the intention so the court considered recklessness. As a result they formed the subjective recklessness test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How did Caldwell (1981) change the test for recklessness?

A

It is not objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the case of Caldwell (1981) relevant to?

A

The test for recklessness becoming objective rather than subjective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case changed the test for recklessness from subjective to objective?

A

Caldwell (1981)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What year was the case of Caldwell?

A

(1981)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What case happened in 1981?

A

Caldwell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the objective test set out in Caldwell (1981)?

A

That a defendant could be seen as reckless if he/she did an act creating an obvious risk even if the defendant was not aware of the risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Look at these cards may take out (Caldwell)

A

H

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In the mens rea hierarchy, where does recklessness fall?

A

It is the lower level of mens rea

17
Q

Why was Caldwell (1981) overruled?

A

The definition caused lots of problems for the court and led to injustices as it was so harsh

18
Q

What case happened in 2003?

A

R v G and another (2003)

19
Q

What year was the case of R v G and another?

A

2003

20
Q

What is the case of R v G and another (2003) relevant too?

A

The case of Caldwell (1981) being too harsh and being overruled by the subjective test created in this case

21
Q

What was the test set out in R v G and another (2003)?

A

A person acts recklessly in respect to:
A circumstance when he is aware that it exists or will exist
A result when he is aware of a rush that will occur

22
Q

Briefly, what are the evaluation points for recklessness?

A

Subjective is fairer
Nearly impossible to prove defendants mind state at the time
Harsh on the victims

23
Q

Why was Caldwell (1981) overruled?

A

The definition caused lots of problems for the court and led to injustices as it was so harsh

24
Q

What case happened in 2003?

A

R v G and another (2003)

25
Q

What year was the case of R v G and another?

A

2003

26
Q

What is the case of R v G and another (2003) relevant too?

A

The case of Caldwell (1981) being too harsh and being overruled by the subjective test created in this case

27
Q

What was the test set out in R v G and another (2003)?

A

A person acts recklessly in respect to:
A circumstance when he is aware that it exists or will exist
A result when he is aware of a rush that will occur

28
Q

Briefly, what are the evaluation points for recklessness?

A

Subjective is fairer
Nearly impossible to prove defendants mind state at the time
Harsh on the victims

29
Q

Why is subjective recklessness fairer than objective recklessness?

A

Because it can take into account characteristics of the defendant which mean they are less likely to foresee the risk of their actions e.g age, learning difficulties

30
Q

What is the problem with mens rea?

A

It is near enough impossible to prove the defendants state of mind at the time of the offence so judges and juries have to make a judgement

31
Q

Why is it argued the subjective test is harsher on victims?

A

It’s harsher for victims and their families because they may feel the defendant should be punished for their risky behaviour which might have caused death or serious injury which might seem glaringly obvious to most people

32
Q

What questions did the legal philosopher Hart propose?

A

Is it fair to apply an objective test to ordinary people who are capable of appreciating a risk?
Is it too lenient to not punish an adult who is perfectly capable of appreciating there is a risk but hasn’t bothered to consider it?

A2 Law - Mens Rea (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions