Reciprocity and Interactional Synchrony Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Seeking proximity

A

Wanting to be near each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Distress if separated

A

Both the infant and caregiver feel distressed when separated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Secure base behaviour

A

Pleasure when reunited: both are happy to be reunited
General orientation: infant is generally aware of the caregiver and frequently makes contact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Observational research of infants

A

Meltzoff and Moore conducted a study and they noted instances of certain behaviours.
Babies will initiate certain behaviours e.g: tongue protrusion and mouth opening.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reciprocity

A

One person responds to the other.
Turn taking.
Both mother and babies can initiate interactions and they appear to take turns in doing so.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Newborn babies and alert phases

A

Babies have periodic ‘alert phrases’ and signal they are ready for interaction, which mothers respond to around 2/3 of the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Interactional synchrony

A

Mirroring. ‘Synchronised’ when they carry out the same action simultaneously.
‘The coordination of micro-level behaviour’.
Their actions and emotions mirror each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Meltzoff and Moore (1977)

A

Observed the beginnings of interactional synchrony in infants as young as two weeks old.
An adult displayed one of three facial expressions or one of three distinct gestures and the child’s response was filmed.
An association was found between the expression/gesture and the action of the child.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Higher synchrony

A

= Higher quality attachment
Important for the development of the attachment.
Provides the necessary foundation for the mother and infant connections.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Isabella et al (1989)

A

Observed 20 mothers and infants together and assessed the degree of synchrony and the quality of mother-infant attachment.
The researchers found that high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality mother-infant attachment, e.g. the emotional intensity of the relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluation of caregiver-infant interactions: POSITIVES

A

Uses well-controlled procedures.
Very fine details of behaviour can be recorded and analysed later bc it’s filmed.
Babies don’t know they’re being observed = no desirability effect
Good validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluation of caregiver-infant interactions: NEGATIVES

A

Hard to know what is happening when observing infants. Many studies into mother-infant interactions have shown the same patterns of behaviour. (Gratier, 2003)
Hard to see things from the baby’s perspective. Is it deliberate?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluation of caregiver-infant interactions: ISSUE & DEBATE

A

SOCIAL SENSITIVITY:
Suggests that children may be disadvantaged by particular child-rearing practices. Mothers who return to work shortly after a child is born restrict the opportunities for achieving interactional synchrony.
Suggests that mothers should not return to work so soon - socially sensitive implications.
NATURE V NURTURE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly