Receptors And Ion Channels Flashcards
What is the rINN name for the following drugs
a) butoxamine
b) clorgyline
c) amphetamine
a) butaxamine
b) clorgiline
c) amfetamine
What is 5-HT
5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin)
Are steroid receptors membrane bound or cytosolic
They are cytosolic proteins
Give the five forces involved in the structure of a receptor in diminishing order of strength
Covalent bonds
Ionic bonds
Hydrogen bonds
Van der Waals Forces
Hydrophobic forces
How are large ligands believed to bind to receptors
Through a zipper interaction
Define agonist in terms of a receptor
An agonist binds to receptors and produces a response
Describe the approximate relationship between the size of the response and the concentration of agonist
What about when the response is plotted against the logarithm of the agonist concentration
Hyperbolic
Sigmoidal
What is the amount of a receptor that is bound by a given concentration of a drug governed by?
The affinity of the drug for the binding site
What is efficacy
The relationship between the amount of receptor occupied by a drug and the size of the response produced
True or false
An agonist has both affinity and efficacy
True
as they both binds to and activates a receptor to produce a response
True or false
Both antagonists and agonists display efficacy
False
both display affinity as antagonists bind but elicit no response
How is efficacy usually measured
What does this allow calculations of
On a log graph
EC50 - A measure of potency for agonists
What is EC 50
The concentration of the agonist that causes 50% of the maximum response
The response does NOT indicate the concentration of agonist occupying half of the receptors
What is potency
The concentration causing a particular magnitude of response (e.g. EC 50) - not to the size of the maximal response
What happens to the log concentration/response curve for an agonist in the presence of a competitive antagonist
It is shifted to the right in a parallel fashion
Can a maximal response be obtained if the agonist is in the presence of a competitive antagonist
Therefore what is another name of competitive antagonism
Yes, if enough agonist is added then the same maximal response is obtained
Surmountable antagonism
Does the addition of a competitive antagonist increase or decrease the EC 50
Increase
Maximal response remains the same
What is a structure activity series
A sequence of experiments to determine the relative potency of a group of structurally related compounds
What can be used to aid receptor classification
Give an example
In the case of ACh, two structure activity series can be seen and these help demonstrate the existence of two types of receptor, nicotinic and muscarinic receptors
Why can drugs with the same chemical formula offer different potencies
What does this demonstrate
Stereoisomers act differently
The complementarity of the interaction between drug and receptor
What is acetyl-β- methylcholine
What does its stereoisomer do
What does this mean for the racemate of acetyl-β-methylcholine?
Cholinergic agonist
Isomer has no affinity
Effectively reduces the concentration of the active isomer by half
What does isoprenaline do
What is the effect of its stereoisomer
What happens if you increase concentrations of the racemate
β- adrenoceptor agonist
Inactive isomer has affinity but no efficacy so acts as an antagonist
Simultaneously increases [agonist] and [antagonist]
What is the forward and backward reactions of the following know as:
D+R↔️DR
What does the rate of each equal?
Forward: K+1; rate =K+1[D][R]
Backwards: K-1; rate = K-1[DR]
What is the notation for the affinity constant of drug D
Ka (=k+1/k-1)
The higher the Ka, the ____ the affinity of D for R
Higher
What is Kd
How to work out Kd
The dissociation constant
1/Kd
What are the units of Ka
What about for Kd
M-1 or L/mol
M or mol/L
Describe D+R↔️DR in terms of α, where α is a fraction of receptors that combine with drug D
Therefore, what does Ka= in terms of α
Thus, what does it mean if α= 0.5
Describe α in terms of Ka and [D]
α=?
[D] Ka
————-
1+[D]Ka
When α=0.5, [D]=1/Ka=Kd. What does this mean in reality?
The affinity constant is the reciprocal of the drug constant that produces 50% occupancy of the receptors
The affinity constant is the reciprocal of the drug constant that produces 50% occupancy of the receptors.
This is usually the concentration of an agonist that causes the half maximal response - true or false?
False
How can you measure the binding of a drug to its receptor directly
Using radioligand binding
What does the binding of a radio ligand consist of
Saturable component (specific binding to receptors) and amazing effectively linear non-saturable component (non - specific binding to non receptor material)
How is specific and non specific binding of radio ligands affected in the presence of a large excess of unlabelled ligand
Specific- almost completely abolished
Non- specific- almost unaffected
How can specific binding of radioligands be calculated
The difference between total binding and non specific binding in the presence of a large excess of non labelled ligands
Two of those
Specific binding sites always represent functional receptors
False
Conclusions from binding experiments must be supported by data about the functional behaviour of the putative receptor
How does the graph of specific binding and non specific binding differ on a chart of [radioligand] vs bound radioligand
Specific and total: rectangular hyperbola
Non specific: linear
Describe α in terms of B (specific binding at the radiolabelled concentration [D]) and Bmax (maximal specific binding)
α= B/Bmax
Describe the equation for the double reciprocal graph of the following equation
α= B/Bmax= [D]Ka/1+[D]Ka
How to calculate Ka and Bmax
1/B=1/[D] x 1/BmaxKa + 1/Bmax
1/Bmax= y intercept -Ka= x intercept
What are the 2 axes for the Scatchard plot
How do you find out Ka and Bmax?
What does [D] refer to
B(x) vs B/[D] (y)
Gradient = -Ka
X intercept= Bmax
Free drug (NOT total concentration added)
Why is the Scatchard plot useful
Helps demonstrate situations where there maybe more than one binding site on a receptor
It can show the different affinities of each site
Can the different binding sites on a receptor affect the affinities of different binding sites
Yes - oxygen binding to haemoglobin - positive cooperativity
What graph is cooperativity seen in
A plot of frequency of channel opening vs agonist concentration
It is sigmoidal and NOT hyperbolic
What is the Hill plot
The equation relating binding to drug concentration can be modified to generate the Hill plot which reveals cooperativity
What are the axes of the Hill plot
x= log[D] y= Log B/(Bmax-B)
What indicated positive and negative cooperativity on a Hill plot
nH >1 is positive
nH <1 is negative
What does the nH =1 mean
In this condition, what does X=, if y=0
1:1 binding between drug and active site
No interaction between binding sites
LogKd
Describe a Hill plot line where there are multiple non interacting binding sites
nH <1 but line will not be straighten
When a fixed concentration of radioligand is used to describe the shape of the graph of ligand binding against log concentration of competing unlabelled drug
What do we need to know for this
Sigmoid
The concentration of unlabelled drug that displaces 50% of the specifically bound radio ligand
What is IC50?
The concentration of unlabelled drug that displaces 50% of the specifically bound radio ligand
What is the equation for the occupancy of receptors by unlabelled ligand α
When [U]=IC50, What does α=?
[U] x KU
———————————-
1+([U]xKU)+([L] x KL)
Where KU and KL are affinity constants for the binding of labelled and unlabelled drugs
α=0.5
Give an equation for KU, when [U]=IC50
KU=…
1+[L]KL
————
IC50
Is there a direct linear relationship between affinity and efficacy
This was thought to be true up until the 1960’s when it was believed that Kd=EC50
This was proved to be incorrect through experiments with Benzilylcholine mustard
What did experiments with BzCh reveal
Describe associated efficacy/ affinity graphs
The concept of ‘spare’ receptors
Affinity does not equal efficacy
Efficacy results from significant amplification of the response so is always left shifted from affinity
Both are sigmoidal
What does BzCh mustard (an antagonist) do to its receptor
What would be expected if the agonist response generated were directly proportional to receptor occupancy? What actually happens?
Irreversibly alkylates the muscarinic receptor
As progressive alkylation occurs thete should be a decrease in maximum response from the agonist with no change in apparent affinity of remaining receptors
With ACh, on the guinea pig ileum, only a fraction of the receptors need to be bound to to produce a maximal response
What happens as the amount of BzCh increases with the amount of ACh?
How can we estimate which percentage of receptors are spare?
At first maximal response is still attainable as BzCh is only affecting spare receptors
Once BzCh fills all spare receptors, maximal response is still just possible
Any extra BzCh results in a fall off of the maximal response
By measuring dose ratio at the point where maximal response is just attainable