Section and Penalty
CA61; S246(1)
7 Years Imp (Exceeds $1000)
1 Year Imp ($500 - $1000)
3 Months Imp (Under $500)
Elements
Receiving elements - what is required to be proved?
Explain what three elements need to be satisfied regarding the “Act of Receiving”?
(SRK)
R v Ma - necessity to negative the accused’s explanation
(Mah God man! What a bullshit excuse)
“There is effectively an overarching additional mental element to the offence. It will be necessary for the Crown to negative the accused’s explanation. It must satisfy the jury beyond reasonable doubt that the altruistic explanation (whatever it may be) is untrue.”
Legislation
When is receiving complete
CA61; S246(3)
As soon as the offender has, either exclusively or jointly with the thief or any other person, possession of, or control over, the property or helps in concealing or disposing of the property.
R v Cox
Possession
R v Cox
“Possession involves two … elements. The first, often called the physical element, is actual or potential physical custody or control. The second element, often referred to as the mental element … is a combination of knowledge and intention; knowledge in the sense of an awareness by the accused that the substance is in his possession … and an intention to exercise possession.”
Cullen v R
(Christian Cullen, the receiver, in possession of a stolen rugby ball - knowing where it is; aware it has been stolen; actual or potential possession over it; intends to exercise control over the rugby ball)
Cullen v R
There are four elements of possession for receiving:
(a) awareness that the item is where it is;
(b) awareness that the item has been stolen;
(c) actual or potential control of the item; and
(d) an intention to exercise that control over the item.
What are the two areas that the Cullen test are divided into?
Person is unaware of the existence of property.
If a person is unaware of the existence of the property, they cannot be said to be in possession of it.
Control over property
The prosecution must prove the receiver arranged for the property to be delivered there, or alternatively, that on discovering the property, he or she intentionally exercised control over it.
R v Donnelly
Not an offence to receive
R v Donnelly
Where stolen property has been returned to the owner or legal title to any such property has been acquired by any person, it is not an offence to subsequently receive it, even though the receiver may know that the property had previously been stolen or dishonestly obtained.
Proving dishonesty - Crooks and Marshall
R v Crooks - there is an implied requirement that the accused act with a dishonest intention.
R v Marshall - People knowingly receiving stolen property with the sole unconditional intention of returning it to the lawful owner or to Police commit no offence.
Property
CA61; S2
Property includes real and personal property, and any estate or interest in any real and personal property, (electricity, money, debt) and anything in action, and any other right or interest.
Includes both tangible and intangible property.
R v Lucinsky
R v Lucinsky
The property received must be the property stolen or illegally obtained (or part thereof), and not some other item for which the illegally obtained property had been exchanged or which are the proceeds.
Taking
When the offender moves the property or causes it to be moved.
Theft elements
Obtain
To obtain or retain for himself or herself or for any other person.
Concept of title
Title:
A right or claim to the ownership of property.
The difference between deception and theft re: title.
Title gained by deception is passed to the offender, as the property is exchanged willingly by the owner, whereas with theft the property is taken without the consent of the owner and no transfer of title occurs.
Voidable title
A title obtained by deception, fraud, duress or misrepresentation is called a ‘voidable title’.
This means that the title can be voided by the seller.
Until the title is voided, the defrauder has voidable title, and can confer good title on anyone who acquires the goods from him or her in good faith and for value.
How to void title (according to the deception module)
S246(4) - effect
When property is no longer deemed stolen, it CANNOT be ‘received’ once that property has been re-acquired by the legal owner or where legal title has been acquired by another person.
‘Knowing’ that property to have been stolen or so obtained
S&B + Kennedy
(Glad I’m not a Kennedy - he has the necessary guilty knowledge)
Simester and Brookbanks:
‘Knowing’ means knowing or correctly believing. A defendant may believe something wrongly but cannot ‘know’ something that is false.
R v Kennedy:
The guilty knowledge that the thing has been stolen or dishonestly obtained must exist at the time of receiving.