Receiving Flashcards
Discuss section 246(1)
Everyone is guilty who
- receives
- any property stolen or obtained by any other imprisonable offence (ie decption)
- knowing that at the time of receiving the property had been stolen or obtain by any other imprisonable offence or
- being reckless as to whether or not that property was stolen or obtained
Discuss the three elements of the act of receiving
- There must be property which has been stolen or has been obtained by an imprisonable offence
- The defendant must have received the property, which requires that the receiving must be from another person. (You cannot receive property from yourself)
- The defendant must receive that property with the knowledge that it has been stolen or obtained by any other imprisonable offence.
When is the act of receiving complete S246(3)
The act of receiving is complete once the offender has, either jointly or exclusively with the thief or any other person, taken possession or control over the property or helps conceal or disposing of it.
What sections defines the punishment for the amount of the goods received
Section 247 CA61
(1) over a $1000 = max 7 years
(2) between $500 and $1000 = 1 year
(3) under $500 = 3 months
R v COX (Possession)
Possession involves two elements. The first is the physical. The actual or potential physical custody or control. The second is the mental which is a combination of of knowledge and intention. Knowledge in the sense that the accussed was aware that the substance was under his possession with the intention to exercis possession.
Cullen v R
There are four elements of possession for receiving
(a) awareness that the item is where it is
(b) awareness that the item has been stolen
(c) actual or potential control of the item
(d) an intention to exercise control over that item.
As discussed in the attempts chapter. The offence must be legally possible. Outline R v Donnelly
Where the stolen property has been returned to the owner or legal tilte has been obtained by any person. It is not an offence to subsequently receive it, even though the receiver may know that the property has previously be stolen or dishonestly obtained.
Basicaaly if the property is returned to the owner and then the offender attempts to come into possession of the property knowing it has been previously stolen and not returned to the owner. He cannot be charged with receiving but rather an attempts.
What is case law R v Lucinsky
The property stolen must be the property received or part there of, and not some other item for which the illegally obtained property had been exchanged or which are proceeds
IE - if a person steals $100 worth of $20 notes and then passes them onto a knowing receiver, then the person receiving is guilty.
But if the person who originally stole the money goes to the bank and exchanges the notes for different denominations, then the person is knowingly receiving the new notes is not liable of receiving as they are not the original notes.
Define the term stolen and quote section
Section 219(4) outlines that theft is committed once the moves the property or causes it to be moved with the intention of depriving the owner permanately of the property.
Voidable title?
Title that has been obtained by deception is defines as voidable title. That is the person that has obtain it be deception has title of the property until the victim does the one of the three following:
- Communication with the deceiver
- Taking all reasonable steps to bring it to the receivers attention.
- advising the police of the deception
Define title
Is the right or claim of right to the ownership of property.
R v Kennedy (knowing the property to be stolen)
The guilty knowledge that the thing has been stolen or dishoneslty obatined must be present at the time of receiving.
Define knowing
Means knowing or correctly believing. The defendant may believe something wrongly, but cannot know something to be false.
Define Reckless
means the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk
Cameron v R
Recklessness is establised if
(a) the defendant recognised there was a real possiblity that
(i) their actions would bring about the proscribed circumstances
(ii) that the proscribed circumstances existed
(b) having regard for the the risk those actions were unreasonable.