Reasoning Flashcards
Implication Family
Take stimulus as true (MBT, SMBT, MBF)
Operations Family
Take answer choices as true, will affect the stimulus (Strengthen, weaken, crux, resolve, explain)
Characterization Family
Describe some element of the stimulus (main point, how conclusion is reached, disagreement, flaw)
Propositions
Declarative statements that are either true for false. Sentences can have 1 or more propositions
Arguments
A proposition (conclusion) supported by other (premises)
Conclusion Indicator Words
Thus, therefore, so hence, as a result, consequently, it follows that, accordingly, clearly
Premise indicators
since, because, for, after all, given that
Assumption
Must be true for the conclusion to be be proven by the premises, but wasn’t stated in the argument
Logical Validity
Valid: Conclusion must be true based on the premises
Invalid: Truth of premises doesn’t guarantee truth of conclusion
Reasoning Steps
- Identify conclusion and premisses
- Evaluate validity of argument
- If invalid, spot assumptions/mistakes
Absolute Statement
Asserts a concrete fact: John is a Dr.
Conditional statement
Hypothetical Relationship (If…Then)
Necessary Condition
Required for event to occur, but does not guarantee it will
ie: If you’re a Dr. then you like people - liking people is necessary, just because you like people, doesn’t mean you’re a dr.
Sufficient Condition
If present, the event will occur, but the event could still occur without the SC
ie: If you’re a Dr. then you like people. - The dr. is the sufficient condition because being a dr. means you do like people
Valid Inferences
- Affirmation: SC allows us to conclude NC (Dr -> Like People)
- Contrapositives: Negate & Reverse (Don’t Like People -> Not Dr.)