Real Business Cycles Flashcards
What is a:
- Recession
- Depression
- Stagflation
*Recession: (simple definition) GDP decline for two consecutive quarters.
*Depression: A more severe and prolonged economics recession
*Stagflation: Low economic growth (may or may not be recession) and high inflation
Rate non-cyclical, cyclical or very cyclical
- Consumption (total)
- Inventories
- Investments
- Non-durable goods -Services
*Consumption: cyclical (moves with GDP, but a little bit less)
*Investments: Very cyclical
*Non-durable goods: Very cyclical
*Services: non-cyclical (but still a little bit).
Imagine a cross correlation table with employment and Industrial production. Industrial production is underlying. Some weakly negative dots in before 0, strong positive dots after 0. Highest positive dot 1 month after. What does this tell you?
Employment one month after measurement of IP-index is strongly correlated with IP-index. -Employment is a lagging indicator of IP. (IP is proxy for GDP).
A central Business cycle feature is the co-movement of employment and GDP. Most economists believe demand for labour is the most important driver. Why?
Productivity shocks.?
A central Business cycle feature is the co-movement of employment and GDP. Most economists believe demand for labour is the most important driver. Why?
Productivity shocks.?.. Not sure about this one.
What are the main assumptions of the RBC model?
!Not completed!
Definition of General Equilibrium
Given prices and exogenous shocks
- Households maximise utility (s.t budget constraints). 2. Firms maximize profits
- Prices clear the market.
Labour supply = labour demand
Goods produced = goods consumed
State the household optimisation problem in RBC:
What is a: 1 - l
(l is small L)
Max u(c,l)
s.t. c=w(1 - l) + d
1-l = n
State the Firm maximisation function in RBC.
What is z?
max d=zn-wn
z is total factor productivity
Does the invisible hand hold for the simple RBC model?
Yes!
Any competitive equilibrium leads to a Pareto efficient allocation of resources.
If the household utility function is u(c,l) = ln(c) + ln(l), what is the marginal rate of substitution between the goods?
Take partial derivatives of c and l to find the marginal utilities
MU(c)= 1/c
MU(l) = 1/l
MU(l) / MU(c) = c/l
In the simple RBC model (not extended to labour market) what three “facts” clearly differentiates it from the data. Or, what is “missing” from the model.
Hint 1. Think real world vs model.
Hint 2. Why do we extend the RBC model with regards to the labour market? What is it that we seek to incorporate?
*Some are unemployed
*For most people, working or not working is a discrete choice (yes or no)
*We see large flows of workers moving in and out of employment at the same time.
If households have the following optimization problem, what is the labour supply function?
Max u = ln(c) + vl v >= 0
s.t
c = wn + a
Which variable is discrete?
Remember chain rule, and substitute constraint into max.
FOC: v ( wn + a ) = w
Gives:
n= 1/v - a/w
n is discrete. 1 or 0.
W.r.t RBC with extended labour market.
Given the household optimization problem:
max V(n) = ln(wn+a) + v( 1 - n)
- What is the payoff if you choose not to work?
- What is the payoff if you choose to work?
- Using w on the x axis and utility on the y axis, draw the two functions you find in 1 and 2.
- What is the intersect between the two?
n is either 1 or 0.
- V(1) = ln(w+a)
- V(0) = ln(a) + v
- 1 is a concave curve, 2 is a straight line.
- The reservation wage.
Consider a person with a concave utility function who is considering whether to search for work or not. If she succeeds in finding a job, she will have a wealth of 6. If does not succeed she has a wealth of 1. Put utility on the y-axis and wealth on the x-axis.
- Draw the concave utility function (disregard math).
- What is the expected payoff of a job search (use math).
- What is the Certainty equivalent of the search (approximate without math, use graph).
- Let’s say the person currently has a job paying 3 wealth, and the certainty equivalent you approximated is 2.35. Will she search for a job? If she had a linear (risk-neutral utility function), what is the Certain equivalent? Would she search for a job then?
- Let’s say she is currently unemployed (1 wealth). Will she search for a job?
- What does this explain with regards to unemployment in the neoclassical BC model?
- See pic. A concave utility function implies risk aversion.
- 0.5*6 + 0.5* 1 = 3.5 wealth.
- Any answer below 3.5 is considered correct since you don’t use math. In our example, the CE is 2.35.
- If she has a job with wealth 3, it is higher than the CE of 2.35. She will not search for a job since she is risk-averse. If she as not risk awerse, her CE would be 3.5 and she would search for a job.
- Yes. CE>1
- Most ppl are risk averse, therefore there is a rigidity in the job market. Can explain some unemployment and can also explain why not everyone works where they get the highest pay.