Reading 20: Fixed Inc PM Part 1 Flashcards
4 activities in the investment management process:
- Setting the investment objectives (with related constraints)
- Developing and implementing a portfolio strategy
- monitoring the portfolio
- adjusting the portfolio
how to manage a portfolio against a bond market index
- select a specific bond market index as the bench
- the objective is either to match or exceed the rate of return on the index
- aka investing on a “benchmark relative basis”
- risk of the bond holdings are evaluated relative to both the index and in relation to the contribution to the risk of the overall (multi asset class) portfolio
enhancement
small mismatch from the index
totally passive to full blown active management
- pure bond indexing (full replication approach)
- enhanced indexing by matching primary risk factors
- enhanced indexing by small risk factor mismatches
- active management by larger risk factor mismatches
- full blown active management
-pure bond indexing (full replication approach)
rarely attempted because of the difficulty, inefficiency and high cost of implementation… this is unique to fixed income
-enhanced indexing by matching primary risk factors
attempt to match the primary index risk factors which makes the portfolio affected by broad market moving events to the same degree as the index
this reduces costs but tracks the index less closely
-enhanced indexing by small risk factor mismatches
the mismatches are small and are intended to enhance the risk return profile enough to overcome the dif in admin costs
-active management by larger risk factor mismatches
large mismatches on the primary risk factors
the obj is to produce sufficient returns to overcome this style’s additional transaction costs while controlling risk
-full blown active management
seeks to construct a portfolio with superior return and risk
bums problem
- coined by Siegel
- cap weighted bond indices give more weight to issuers that borrow the most (the bums)
- but the bums may be more likely to be downgraded and have lower returns
matrix pricing
estimating the value of a bond on the basis of inferred market value from their characteristics
factors explaining infrequent trading of bonds
- long term inv horizon
- limited # of distinct investors in many bond issues
- limited size of many bond issues
non investability of bond indices
- infrequent trading of bond issues
- bond heterogeneity
- limited size
what should very risk averse investors invest in?
an index with a short or intermediate duration in order to limit market value risk
differences between bond and equity issuances
there are more issuers of bonds including govts
most equity issuers only have one type of common stock but several bond issues with dif maturities, seniority and other features
why invest in an indexed fixed income portfolio?
lower fees
broad bond index portfolios provide excellent diversification-> lower risk
factors via to chose a bond benchmark
1 market value risk => as the maturity and duration increase so does market risk bc longer portfolios are more sensitive to changes in rates.
2 income risk => if stability and dependability of income are the primary needs then the long term portfolio is least risky bc it locks in the income stream and doesn’t subject it to rate fluctuations
3 credit risk
4 liability framework risk (should match duration of assets and liabilities)
ways to limit bums
having county capped and alternative weighted index versions may limit bums exposure…. though this could possibly result in greater exposure to less liquid issues
why might bond indicies not serve as valid benchmarks?
because if they are not investable, it is unrealistic and unfair to expect a manager to match its performance
six criteria for valid benchmarks (Bailey, Richards, Tierney)
unambiguous
measurable
appropriate -> may break as the index or portfolio changes over time
reflective of current investment options -> often this is broken because if they contain unfamiliar securities
specified in advance
accountable
custom benchmark usage
you may want to build a custom benchmark that is constructed according to the specific characteristics of the manager’s portfolio
yield curve
relationship between interest rates and time to maturity
twist of the yield curve
movement in contrary directions of interest rates at two maturities
what % and which factor accounts for most of the change in value for a bond?
the yield curve shift (parallel) typically accounts for about 90% of the change in bond value
interest rate risk
sensitivity of index’s returns to level of interest rates
yield curve risk
changes in the shape of the yield curve
spread risk
changes in the spread between treasuries and non treasuries
optionality risk
measures exposures to change in cash flows due to call or put features
portfolio duration vs key rate duration
interest rate risk (parallel yield curve shift) -> portfolio duration
yield curve risk (twist/non parallel move in yield curve)-> key rate duration
cell matching technique/stratified sampling
- divides the index into “cells” that represent qualities designed to reflect the risk factors of the index
- then select sample bonds from those in each cell to represent the cell taking into account the cells percentage of the total
ex: if A rated corporates are 4% of the index, then A rated bonds will be sampled and added until they are 4% of the portfolio.
4 factors to decide which index to use
market value risk (longer portfolios are more sensitive to interest rates)
income risk (a long portfolio locks in the income and does not subject the portfolio to fluctuating rates)
credit risk
liability framework risk
multifactor model technique
the portfolio is constructed by making use of a set of factors that drive bond returns
factors: effective duration, key rate duration and present value distribution of cash flows, sector and quality percent sector duration contribution quality spread duration contribution sector/coupon/maturity cell weights issuer exposure
why is it bad to replicate an index with too few securities?
issuer event risk becomes increased
multi factor model technique: sector/coupon/maturity cell weights
some bonds like MBS have call risk that’s hard to replicate. matching its convexity from a transaction cost standpoint can be pricey.
so matching the call exposure is better done via matching the SECTOR, COUPON & MATURITY weights
effective duration
sensitivity of price to a small parallel rate shift
Convexity adjustment
for large parrell rate shifts and adj is added to improve price change accuracy bc effective duration can’t capture it all
key rate duration
measures price impact of shifts in key points on the yield curve.
we hold the spot rates constant for all points along the yield curve but one. this allows to see that point’s sensitivity.