RCT (Outcomes) Flashcards
Why do we need outcomes in trail
An appropriate outcome must be decided upon before the start of the trail in order to determine if the intervention and outcome has a causal relationship.
What is the primary outcome?
The main outcome of the study
What is the secondary outcome?
Any other outcomes of the study that isn’t the primary study
What are the 5 criterias that outcomes should meet?
1) Clinically meaningful
2) Mesureable
3) Responsive
4) Reliable
5) Valid
What does it mean when an outcome is clinically meaningful?
The outcome is of significant importance for the patient group studied.
What does it mean when an outcome is measureable?
The outcome for both the intervention group and the control group should be able to be measured in order to compare the outcomes and detect any differences
What does it mean when an outcome is responsive?
The measurement for the outcome should be able to detect any changes in the trial
What does it mean when an outcome is reliable?
If the trail was to take place again on multiple occasions, would the outcomes of the trail be consistent
What does it mean when an outcome is valid?
The measurement tool for the outcome should actual measure what you want it to measure
What is internal validity?
Internal validity is concerned with whether the results of the study (the differences in the outcomes between the trial arms) are legitimate. If so, then a casual relationship between the IV and DV can be shown.
What are the 6 main treats to internal validity?
1) History
2) Maturation
3) Testing effects
4) Instrumentation
5) Mortality
6) Selection Bias
What is meant by a ‘History’ threat to internal validity?
Any events that are happening outside of the trial that affect the participants responses to the trial (e.g. media campaigns)
What is meant by a ‘maturation’ threat to internal validity?
(more likely to be affect trails that take a long time) Any natural changes that occur over time to the participants, in which affects the outcome other than the intervention
What is meant by a ‘testing effects’ threat to internal validity?
If you were to test the same participants over and over again, they may remember the correct answers and realise what they are being tested for. Which leads to a bias outcome
What is meant by ‘instrumentation’ threat to internal validity?
Whereby the instrument used to measure the outcomes changes the outcomes itself