RCRA Flashcards
RCRA - Factors Leading to Passage
- concern that air and water statutes would make land the path of least resistance -> RCRA was thought of at the time as eliminating the last env. law loophole
- designed to be very tough
RCRA - Impact of Strict Regs
- resulted in shutdown of hazardous waste facilities (they hadn’t been regulated previously, + regulation meant sudden increase in costs -> unprofitable)
Original 1976 RCRA - Section 3002
- Section on “Standards applicable to generators of hazardous waste”
- Administrator shall promulgate regs establishing such standards, applicable to generators of hazardous waste identified or listed under this subtitle
- Prof emphasized lack of “reasonably” in there - reflects RCRA designed to be tough
Section 7003 of Original RCRA
- Imminent Hazard Section
- allows Secretary to sue whenever there’s evidence that handling, storage, treatment, transportation or disposal of any solid waste/hazardous waste presenting “imminent and substantial endangerment” to health or env
- Sec can sue any person for contributing to the disposal to stop it or “to take such other action as may be necessary”
- Innovative arg - present leaking = contributing to the disposal, and can hold liable under strict joint + several liability
Hazardous and Solid Waste Act Amendments of 1984
- amendments to RCRA prompted by distrust between legislative and executive branches (distrust of Gorsuch EPA during Reagan admin)
1984 Amendments - Major Changes
- kept same overall structure
- defined “solid waste” + “hazardous waste”
- determined standards “necessary to protect human health and the environment” applicable to generators, transporters, and owners/operators of TSD facilities
TSD Facilities
- TSD = treatment, storage, + disposal -> these are the facilities that deal w/ the hazardous waste in the end
RCRA vs. CERCLA
- RCRA is generally more prospective, CERCLA more retrospective
- however, CERCLA winds up having some prospective effects b/c parties don’t want to be subject to its liability
Generators - Duties
- identify hazardous waste
- label hazardous waste
- initiate manifest system to track waste
- arrange for transportation by transporter licensed for hazardous waste to TSD facility licensed to handle hazardous waste
Transporter - Duties
- Use manifest system (tracks the hazardous waste)
- comply with EPA Transporter Requirements (includes truck design standards, driver training, and insurance requirements)
- comply with DOT Hazardous Material Transportation
TSD Facilities - Duties
Design, performance, and operating requirements
Disposal Facility Illustrative Requirements:
- insurance requirements + financial assurances -> waste stays hazardous for much longer than you’re around, + need to be prepared to pay
- double liners & leachate collection (part of RCRA design standards)
- pre-treatment requirements to minimize migration of hazardous constituents (e.g., incineration)
- closure and post-closure plans
Major Issues Under RCRA
- what is the meaning of “waste” and “hazardous”?
- what constitutes a TSD?
- what environmental standards apply to TSDs?
Solid Waste Definition
- under RCRA, “solid waste” can be solid, semisolid, liquid, or gas
- the definition provides certain exemptions (solid or dissolved material in domestic sewage, irrigation return flows or industrial discharges that are point sources subject to CWA, special nuclear or byproduct material subject to Atomic Energy Act)
- big question becomes when material qualifies as “discarded”
Design Standards vs. Tech Standards
- design standards means the gov is telling you what kinds of equipment you need to use
- tech-based means you have to achieve a certain goal (which is set based on existing tech) but you can use whatever you want to get there
Why so difficult to decide when material discarded?
- difficult in part b/c the statute does want to promote resource recovery and recycling -> doesn’t want to prematurely label stuff discarded
- also, in process of recycling and recovering, you’re probs exposing people + env. to hazardous substances - theoretically not waste, so statute doesn’t cover, but might still be worried about it
- 54 pages in Fed Reg on this - COMPLEX (need very careful determ. on whether hazardous WASTE being disposed of safely without discouraging useful acts)