RAWR Flashcards

1
Q

An assertion open to challenge

A

Claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assert something that could possibly becontradicted

A

Claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

An argument about a quantifiable topic

A

Claim of fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Asserts that something is true in the past, present, or future

A

Claim of fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Claim of fact - asserts that some thing is true in the ____, ______, or ______

A

Past, present, future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Argues wether something good or bad is

A

Claim of value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Based on judgement & evaluation

A

Claim of value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Claim of value - argues whether something is ______ or ______

A

Good, bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Claim of value - based on ______ & ______

A

Judgement, evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Asserts the implementation of a certain policy

A

Claim of Policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Driven need to present a solution to problems that have arisen

A

Claim of Policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Some times, response to dim of fact

A

Claim of policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Connection among texts

A

Intertext

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Before the text

A

Hypertext

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Uses hyperlinks

A

Hyper text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Errors in reasoning that invalidate an argument

A

Logical fallacies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

An arguer presents argument asap one only two options despite the multiple possibilities

A

False dilemma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Conclude to be true just because it is not proven to De false, vice verse

A

Appeal to ignorance ( arguments ad lanorantlem)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Series of increasingly superficial and unacceptable consequences is drawn

A

Slippery slope ( domino fallacy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Two or more points are rolled into one and the reader is expected to accept/ reject both

A

Complex question (loaded question)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Occurs when a threat, instead af reasoning, is used to argue

A

Appeal to force (argumentum ad baraculum)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Element of pity is used instead of logical reasoning

A

Appeal to pity ( argumentum ad misericordiam)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Unpleasant consequences of believing something are pointed out to show that the belief is false

A

Appeal to consequences (argumentum ad consequentiam)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Considered to he valid because it is what the majority thinks

A

Bandwagon (appeal to popularity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Tries to refute the argument by attacking the person

A

Attacking the person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Argument quotes an expert who is not qualified in the particular subject

A

Appeal to authority (argumentum ad verecundiam)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Authority in question is not mentioned or named

A

Anonymous authority

28
Q

Sample is not enough/ significant to support a generalization

A

Hasty generalization

29
Q

Assumed that two are similar, in some ways are also similar

A

False analogy

30
Q

General rule is applied to a situation, even when it should be an exception

A

Accident

31
Q

Since event A happened before B, therefore A is the cause of B

A

Post hoc

32
Q

Direction between cause & effect is reversed

A

Wrong direction

33
Q

Explanation for an event is reduced to one thing when there are also other reasons

A

Complex cause

34
Q

Supposed to prove something concludes something else instead

A

Irrelevant conclusion

35
Q

Position of the opposition is twisted

A

Straw Man

36
Q

If A is true, then B is true
If B is true, therefore A is true

A

Affirming the consequent

37
Q

If A is true, then B is true; if A is not true, then B is not true

A

Denying the antecedent

38
Q

When arguments contradict one another

A

Inconsistency

39
Q

Central idea ofmultiple-paragraph composition

A

Thesis statement

40
Q

What are the parts of a thesis statement?

A
  1. Topic
  2. Position
  3. Reason/s
  4. Concession
41
Q

Subject of the text

A

Topic

42
Q

Your stand on topic

A

Position

43
Q

Explanation and justification of your position

A

Reason/s

44
Q

Opposing viewpoint on topic

A

Concession

45
Q

What are the models of thesis writing

A
  1. Basic Thesis statement C topic + position)
  2. Thesis statement with concession (basic thesis statement + concession)
  3. Thesis statement with concession & reason
  4. Thesis statement with reason
46
Q

Guides, controls, & unities ideas in paragraph

A

Topic sentence

47
Q

Book review / article critique

A
  • Criticize
  • critique
  • critic
48
Q

Expressing disapproval finding faults in something without providing acomprehensive analysis

A

Criticize

49
Q

Implies move detailed analysis and evaluation, considering both positive & negative view

A

Critique

50
Q

Is a person who engages in the act of critiquing

A

Critic

51
Q

What are the differences of Book Review & Report in terms of purpose?

A

1.) Purpose:
Book Review -> provides critical evaluation and opinion of a book.

Book Report- > focuses on summarizing the content of book.

52
Q

What are the differences of Book Review & Report in terms of content?

A

2.) Content:
- book review -> analyzes strengths, weaknesses, & impact
- book report -> summarizes the key aspects of the book

53
Q

Differences of Book Review & Report in terms of writing style

A

3.) writing style:
- book review -> more subjective & critical
- book report-> objective & factual

54
Q

Differences of book review & report in terms of length:

A

4.) length:
- book review→ can vary in length, depending on the prediction
- book report → usually shorter than book reviews

55
Q

Specialized form of academic writing in which a reviewer evaluates

A

Book review/ article critique

56
Q

Structure of book review

A

I. Introduction
II. Summary
III. Review/ critique
IV. Conclusion

57
Q

5% of the paper

A

Introduction

58
Q

Has title, author, & any relevant background information of book/author

A

Introduction

59
Q

10% of the paper

A

Summary

60
Q

Concise summary of the books main plot or content

A

Summary

61
Q

Focus on key events, characters, etc.

A

Summary

62
Q

75% of the paper

A

Review/critique

63
Q

Writing style, plot & structure, characters, themes & messages, originality & creativity, strengths & weaknesses

A

Review/ critique

64
Q

Other 10% of the paper

A

Conclusion

65
Q

Summarize your main points
Overall impression of the work
Final assessment of the book, if recommending it or not, & explaining your reasoning

A

Conclusion

66
Q

Elicits the expected response fromthe reader

A

Business letters