RAWR Flashcards

1
Q

An assertion open to challenge

A

Claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assert something that could possibly becontradicted

A

Claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

An argument about a quantifiable topic

A

Claim of fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Asserts that something is true in the past, present, or future

A

Claim of fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Claim of fact - asserts that some thing is true in the ____, ______, or ______

A

Past, present, future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Argues wether something good or bad is

A

Claim of value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Based on judgement & evaluation

A

Claim of value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Claim of value - argues whether something is ______ or ______

A

Good, bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Claim of value - based on ______ & ______

A

Judgement, evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Asserts the implementation of a certain policy

A

Claim of Policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Driven need to present a solution to problems that have arisen

A

Claim of Policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Some times, response to dim of fact

A

Claim of policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Connection among texts

A

Intertext

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Before the text

A

Hypertext

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Uses hyperlinks

A

Hyper text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Errors in reasoning that invalidate an argument

A

Logical fallacies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

An arguer presents argument asap one only two options despite the multiple possibilities

A

False dilemma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Conclude to be true just because it is not proven to De false, vice verse

A

Appeal to ignorance ( arguments ad lanorantlem)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Series of increasingly superficial and unacceptable consequences is drawn

A

Slippery slope ( domino fallacy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Two or more points are rolled into one and the reader is expected to accept/ reject both

A

Complex question (loaded question)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Occurs when a threat, instead af reasoning, is used to argue

A

Appeal to force (argumentum ad baraculum)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Element of pity is used instead of logical reasoning

A

Appeal to pity ( argumentum ad misericordiam)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Unpleasant consequences of believing something are pointed out to show that the belief is false

A

Appeal to consequences (argumentum ad consequentiam)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Considered to he valid because it is what the majority thinks

A

Bandwagon (appeal to popularity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Tries to refute the argument by attacking the person
Attacking the person
26
Argument quotes an expert who is not qualified in the particular subject
Appeal to authority (argumentum ad verecundiam)
27
Authority in question is not mentioned or named
Anonymous authority
28
Sample is not enough/ significant to support a generalization
Hasty generalization
29
Assumed that two are similar, in some ways are also similar
False analogy
30
General rule is applied to a situation, even when it should be an exception
Accident
31
Since event A happened before B, therefore A is the cause of B
Post hoc
32
Direction between cause & effect is reversed
Wrong direction
33
Explanation for an event is reduced to one thing when there are also other reasons
Complex cause
34
Supposed to prove something concludes something else instead
Irrelevant conclusion
35
Position of the opposition is twisted
Straw Man
36
If A is true, then B is true If B is true, therefore A is true
Affirming the consequent
37
If A is true, then B is true; if A is not true, then B is not true
Denying the antecedent
38
When arguments contradict one another
Inconsistency
39
Central idea ofmultiple-paragraph composition
Thesis statement
40
What are the parts of a thesis statement?
1. Topic 2. Position 3. Reason/s 4. Concession
41
Subject of the text
Topic
42
Your stand on topic
Position
43
Explanation and justification of your position
Reason/s
44
Opposing viewpoint on topic
Concession
45
What are the models of thesis writing
1. Basic Thesis statement C topic + position) 2. Thesis statement with concession (basic thesis statement + concession) 3. Thesis statement with concession & reason 4. Thesis statement with reason
46
Guides, controls, & unities ideas in paragraph
Topic sentence
47
Book review / article critique
- Criticize - critique - critic
48
Expressing disapproval finding faults in something without providing acomprehensive analysis
Criticize
49
Implies move detailed analysis and evaluation, considering both positive & negative view
Critique
50
Is a person who engages in the act of critiquing
Critic
51
What are the differences of Book Review & Report in terms of purpose?
1.) Purpose: Book Review -> provides critical evaluation and opinion of a book. Book Report- > focuses on summarizing the content of book.
52
What are the differences of Book Review & Report in terms of content?
2.) Content: - book review -> analyzes strengths, weaknesses, & impact - book report -> summarizes the key aspects of the book
53
Differences of Book Review & Report in terms of writing style
3.) writing style: - book review -> more subjective & critical - book report-> objective & factual
54
Differences of book review & report in terms of length:
4.) length: - book review→ can vary in length, depending on the prediction - book report → usually shorter than book reviews
55
Specialized form of academic writing in which a reviewer evaluates
Book review/ article critique
56
Structure of book review
I. Introduction II. Summary III. Review/ critique IV. Conclusion
57
5% of the paper
Introduction
58
Has title, author, & any relevant background information of book/author
Introduction
59
10% of the paper
Summary
60
Concise summary of the books main plot or content
Summary
61
Focus on key events, characters, etc.
Summary
62
75% of the paper
Review/critique
63
Writing style, plot & structure, characters, themes & messages, originality & creativity, strengths & weaknesses
Review/ critique
64
Other 10% of the paper
Conclusion
65
Summarize your main points Overall impression of the work Final assessment of the book, if recommending it or not, & explaining your reasoning
Conclusion
66
Elicits the expected response fromthe reader
Business letters