Rational Choice and Exchange Theory Flashcards
Exchange Theories: Intro
Human social action is built on material and non-material social exchange
Roots in behaviorism (psychology)–social environment rewards
Roots in Rational Choice Theory (RCT)–maximize pleasure, minimize pain
- maximize utility function (pleasure/reward)
George Homans: Intro
Harvard Soc prof–died 1989
Psychological “reductionism”–no emergentism in emergentism/individualism debate between sociology and psychology
Elementary Forms of Social Life–used propositions of behavioral psychology to explain micro sociology
George Homans: Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms: Success Proposition
“For all actions taken by persons, the more often a particular action of a person is rewarded, the more likely the person is to perform that action”
George Homans: Social Behavior: It’s Elementary Forms: Stimulus Proposition
“If in the past the occurrence of a particular stimulus, or set of stimuli, has been the occasion on which a person’s action has been rewarded, then the more similar the present stimuli are to the past ones, the more likely the person is to perform the action, or some similar action.”
George Homans: Social Behavior: It’s Elementary Forms: Value Proposition
“The more valuable to a person is the result of his action, the more likely he is to perform the action”
George Homans: Social Behavior: It’s Elementary Forms: Deprivation-Satiation Proposition
“The more often in the recent past a person has received a particular reward, the less valuable any further unit of that reward becomes for him”
George Homans: Social Behavior: It’s Elementary Forms: Aggression-Approval Propositions
“Proposition A: When a person’s action does not receive the reward he expected, or receives punishment he did not expect, he will be angry…”
“Proposition B: When a person’s action receives the reward he expected, especially a greater reward than he expected, or does not receive punishment he expected, he will be pleased…”
George Homans: Social Behavior: It’s Elementary Forms: Rationality Proposition
“In choosing between alternative actions, a person will choose that which, as perceived by him at the time, the value, V, of the result, multiplied by the probability, p, of getting the result, is the greater.
George Homans: Criticisms
We don’t use these theories specifically–we feel our way through it
No macro theory–never gets beyond these propositions
Peter Blau: Intro
A theory of society must account for social structure
- how do emergent properties arise from basic exchange
Peter Blau: 4 Stage Theory
- Personal exchange between people gives rise to…
- Differentiation of status and power, leading to…
- Legitimization and organization, which allows for…
- Opposition and change.
Peter Blau: Micro Interaction
Begins with psychological attraction and desires for rewards
If both parties are mutually attracted a reciprocal association is established
- The rewards furnished sustain the association
- These rewards can be intrinsic (ex emotions) or extrinsic
Differentiation–one party desires a reward that they cannot furnish in return
- Subordination occurs, giving the one party a type of “generalized credit” from the other
Peter Blau: The Group (microstructures)
Individuals desire to be accepted by groups–needs:
- impress group by demonstrating potential reward
- Then display deference to the authority structure of the group (subordinate oneself)
Peter Blau: Social Norms
Norms integrate groups by governing the relationships of power
Most important in group context
- Agreement that emerges among the subordinates about the superior is critical
- Collective approval legitimates power
— This provides the basis of organization
- Collective disapproval engenders opposition
— This provides the basis of opposition ideologies and collective movements
Peter Blau: Macrostructures (one of the first bridging theories)
Composed of substructures (micro or macro)
Value consensus, not norms, integrates substructures (ex patriotism, consumerism)
Forces within/between substructures influence emergent properties of the macrostructure
Formalized procedures turn many macrostructures into institutions (education, family, religion, state, etc)