RAT 3: Mobility Deficits and Mvt/Coord Deficits (no contraindications - see other deck) Flashcards
What are the two most serious adverse events related to spinal manipulation?
- Cauda Equina Syndrome is the most serious complication associated with lumbar spine manipulation. (pg 219)
- The most serious adverse event related to cervical spinal manipulation is cervical artery dysfunction (CAD) related to vertebral basilar or internal carotid artery insufficiency rarely resulting in stroke or death. pg 220
Spinal Manipulation: how does the risk of CES or Cervical ARtery Dysfunction (CAD) compare to the risk associated with medication use?
- The incidence of major adverse events is small. The relative risk of minor or moderate adverse events is similar for MT (manual therapy). exercise treatments, and sham or passive control interventions. The meta-analysis revealed that the relative risk of having a minor or moderate adverse event with MT, meaning high velocity thrust, is significantly less than the risk of taking medications.
- Estimated risk of death from using NSAIDs for OA is 100 to 400 times the risk of death from cervical manipulation.
- Lumbar manipulation is 3700 to 148000 times safer than NSAIDs and 55,000 to 444,000 times safer than surgery for lumbar disc herniation, and CES is 7,400 to 37,000 times more likely to occur from surgery than manipulation.
- All healthcare interventions have inherent risk that should be weighted against patient-perceived outcomes and available alternatives.
Do the effects of spinal manipulation rely on careful detection of a segmental movement deficit?
The current evidence to support a manipulation classification suggests that a successful outcome is linked to correctly identifying individuals who are responders to manipulation rather than a clinician’s ability to accurately localize a dysfunctional segment, localize a technique to a specific level, or use a specific manipulation technique. (pg 220)
However, I thought Dr. Mincer said in class that they are even more effective if they are at the correct level. Maybe we should ask again (or pelase edit this so it is correct if you know the answer already). - Sara
How large is the placebo effect of spinal manipulation?
Placebo is estimated to account for 10% to 25% of the benefits of spinal manipulation (pg 221)
How does the addition of exercise affect outcomes in patients being treated using spinal manipulation?
I finally asked Dr. Mincer about this. The book doesn’t actually present any studies that compared exercise with no exercise. However they almost always include exercise in all treatment groups
Dr. Mincer said that we should trust her (and our instinct and knowledge of physiology) that the addition of exercise has a positive effect on outcomes in pts being treated using spinal manipulation!!
What are the six key exam findings that help a therapist recognize when a patient might benefit from spinal manipulation?
Key Findings Dr. Mincer was looking for
- No symptoms distal to the knee
- Recent onset ( less than 16 days)
- Low FABQWS- less than 19
- Hypomobility of the L-spine: AROM limited, endrange pain increased but no worse with movement, PAIVM or PPIVM segmental hypomobility low T-spine - lumbar - sacroiliac
- At least one Hip IR ROM greater than 35° (prone)
- Regional Deficits: mobility, muscles performance/length, activity limitations
What is the CPR for spinal manipulation?
CPR for spinal manipulation
- duration of symptoms less than 16 days (ie. acute LBP)
- FABQW subscale 18 or less (same as less than 19)
- no symptoms distal to the knee
- at least one hip IR PROM greater than 35° measured in prone
- hypomobility at one or more lumbar levels assessed with CPA PAIVM or spring test
***note: this is the same as the Key Findings Dr. Mincer was looking for in the table except that it is missing the point about regional deficits.
List the specific treatment options for a patient in the Manipulation & Mobilization Subgroup. (Start with listing only four major items)
Or go with 6 things from the chart
In persons with LBP and mobility deficits, a wide variety of manual interventions such as:
- Mobilization
- Supine lumbopelvic thrust manip
- Side-lying lumbar thrust manip
- Nonthrust manip of CPA mobilization
- UPA PAIVM
- PPIVM
- MET (Muscle Energy Technique)
- Soft tissue mobilization
- Other manipulation techniques plus exercise
****PLUS EXERCISE! (Don’t forget to add exercise to all of these. Mobility exercises (anterior./posterior pelvic tilt in supine or quadriped) and stabilization exercises (TrA activation, ADIM, etc.)
Also, book text references chart on pg 115, that lists the following interventions for this group
- Lumbopelvic mobilization or manipulation
- Muscle energy technique (MET)
- AROM: anterior/posterior pelvic tilt (supine or quad-ruped, 10 reps, 3-4 times daily)
- AROM and stabilization exercises
- Active/passive ROM to augment mobilization/manipulation
- Address regional and functional deficits
What are 5 mobilizations we learned about to treat pts in the Manip and Mob Subgroup?
Mobilization
- Supine lumbopelvic thrust manip
- Side-lying lumbar thrust manip
- Nonthrust manip of CPA mobilization
- UPA PAIVM (I think this is considered a non-thrust manip too)
- PPIVM (isn’t this more of an exam technique)
Movement Coordination Impairments - What 9 key factors aid recognition of non-pregnant patients who may benefit from stabilization?
- younger (>40)
- 3 or more prior episodes
- ↑frequency of episodes
- generally > flexibility
- aberrant movement: instability catch or thigh climbing, painful arc mid-range during F/E
- SLR ROM >91°
- central (PA) passive accessory intervertebral movement hypermobility
- no centralization or peripheralization
- prone instability test
Mvt/Coord Deficits: What are 4 subjective things that could show up with a pt who may benefit from stabilization?
- giving away and giving out
- frequent episodes of LBP
- condition that is progressively getting worse
- frequent need to manipulate the spine
Mvt/Coord Deficits: What are 5 common complaints during posture or movement in a pt who may benefit from stabilization?
- painful locking or catching during twisting or bending
- pain during transitional activities
- pain on returning from a flexed position
- pain during a trivial or sudden activity
- difficulty with unsupported sitting; pain that worsens with sustained posture
Mvt/Coord Deficits: What are 6 common objective findings in a pt who may benefit from stabilization?
- poor lumbopelvic control (such as segmental hinging or pivoting with movement)
- poor coordination or neuromuscular control
- decreased strength and endurance of local muscles at the level of segmental instability
- aberrant movements
- pain with sustained posture and positions
- poor posture and postural deviations such as a lateral shift
What are the two main approaches to spinal stabilization?
Specific Stabilization (motor control approach)
General stabilization
Breifly describe the Specific Stabilization approach to spinal stabilization
Also called motor control approach)-
activation of the deep trunk muscles (TrA and MF) is consistently observed as delayed or reduced in LB, while the superficial muscles are often overactive. In these individuals, stabilization exercise involving an early motor control intervention targeting the deep muscles of the TrA MF may be needed, but this is unlikely to be the only target of trunk muscle performance in the exercise program. One misconception about this approach is that the only focus is preferential activation of the TrA and MF. Posture, muscle activation and functional movement patterns are also addressed
Breifly describe the General Stabilization approach to spinal stabilization
General stabilization- places greater emphasis on exercises designed to improve the endurance and stabilizing function of the superficial trunk muscles (ie, ES< oblique abs, quadratus lumborum) without preferential activation of the deep trunk muscles.
What is the goal of any stabilization program?
“The goal of any stabilization program is optimum control of the spine to meet the patient’s functional demands.” (pg 231 under heading)
Also found this one:
The goals of stabilization exercise are to
train muscular motor patterns to
- increase spinal stability,
- reduce pain,
- control aberrant segmental mobility, and
- improve daily functional ability.
pg 228
which stabilization approach focuses on using principles of moter learning for skill aquisition?
Specific Stabilizing Exercise (SSE)
There are 3 phases