Rape Flashcards
Hughes [1841]
penetration
penetration of the vagina, the hymen need not be ruptured
Ram and Ram [1893] 17 Cox CC 609
by the penis
a women can aid and abet rape and cause a person to engage in non consensual sexual activity
Ismail [2005] EWCA Crim
of the vagina, anus or mouth of C
sentencing should not be distinguished between the orifices penetrated. This is based on the view that each represent violation
Gaston [1981] 73 Cr App R 164
this was not rape, only indecent assault – but now rape under 2003 act
Reynard Sinaga [2020]
• The 1994 criminal justice and public order Act made it rape, meaning a man can rape a man.
Cogan and Leak [1976] QB 217
marital rape
Cogan and Leak [1976] QB 217 – D was guilty of procuring another to rape his wife
R [1992] 1 AC 599
a husband can rape his wife
A [2012] EWCA Crim 1646
still rape even though D was brought up abroad where marital non-consensual rape doesn’t exist
Horn [1912] 7 Cr App R 200
burden of proof on prosecution to prove lack of consent
Malone [1998] 2 Cr App R 447
- D appealed against his conviction for raping a 16 year old drunken girl in her bedroom
- C said she did not physically resist and did not verbally protest, as the drink had disabled her from doing either
- D argued that C must demonstrate lack of consent by resistance either by speech or by physical conduct
Communication of no consent
• D appealed against his conviction for raping a 16 year old drunken girl in her bedroom
• C said she did not physically resist and did not verbally protest, as the drink had disabled her from doing either
• D argued that C must demonstrate lack of consent by resistance either by speech or by physical conduct
• CA rejected his argument: but there must be some evidence of lack of consent
Cooper & Schaub [1994] Crim LR 531
Rape as a continuing act.
the initial act of penetration continues until the other elements are present
Leaver [2006] EWCA Crim 2988
D had consensual sex at a bus stop but later failed to withdraw when C said “no”
Flattery [1887] 2 QBD 410
- C mother took C to the ‘doctors’ stall in a market
- The mother explained C symptoms (seizures)
- The doctor took C to an inn and said to cure the seizures “natures string wanted breaking”
- Had sexual intercourse with C
- D’s conviction was upheld – deception as to the nature of the act
Williams [1923] 1 KB 340
- D choirmaster deceived C1, ages 16, into believing that sexual intercourse was an act which would imbrove her breakther, and therefore her singing
- D said ‘ your breather is not quite right and I have to make an air passage to make it right’
- D told a similar story to C2, whom he did not rape but sexually assaulted
- Conviction upheld because of the deception vitiated consent
Linekar [1995] 2 Cr App R 49
no deception as to nature of the act where a sex worker consented to sex as the basis of a lie that she would be paid