Raine Et Al 1997 Flashcards

1
Q

Aim

A

Find the difference in brain structure for murder and non-murderers
By looking at the role of pre-frontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus and thalamus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dependent variable

A

Relative glucose levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How many offenders pleading NGRI to the crime of murder were there in the study

A

41

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many controls were there

A

41

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How many of the NGRI were male

A

39

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How many of the NGRI were female

A

2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many had history of brain damage?

A

23

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How many had drug abuse

A

3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How many were schizophrenic

A

6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How many had epilepsy?

A

2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How many had emotional/learning disorders

A

7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the controls (people)

A

Same age and sex
No crime or mental illness history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Did any of the controls have schizophrenia

A

Yes 6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Where were they tested?

A

University of California

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain the procedure

A

Injected with glucose tracer
Perform continuous performance task for 32 minutes
Pet scan carried out after

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How long did they do the continuous performance task for

A

32 mins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Were they allowed to practice the CPT before the glucose tracer was injected

A

Yes, for 10 minutes

18
Q

Are any of the participants on medication?

A

No
The NGRIs were taken off medication for two weeks

19
Q

How are the pets scan results broken up?

A

Broken into boxes
So you could measure the relative amount of tracer in 4 cortical regions and the 4 subcortical regions

20
Q

What results did the NGRIs show

A

Less activity in:
Frontal sub
Pre-frontal lobe
Parietal lobe

21
Q

What does Prefrontal lobe control

A

Rational thinking
Self restraint
Memory

22
Q

What does the parietal lobe control

A

Abstract thinking
Morality
Justice

23
Q

What area was there more activity in for the NGRIs

A

Occipital lobe

24
Q

What was there an imbalance in

A

Left and right limbic system

25
Which side of the limbic system was there more activity in and why?
Right That’s where the amygdala and thalamus are They are both linked to aggression
26
What does prefrontal deficits show
Make someone more impulsive and emotional
27
How can the deficits in the limbic system make someone more aggressive?
Thalamus processes information Amygdala controls urges and desires Hippocampus processes memory So deficits make it hard to learn from mistakes and understand emotions
28
What does a large sample of 82 mean?
Anomalies should not affect data It will be representative of a wider population High generalisability
29
How are NGRIs unusual offenders and how does this effect generalisability
Don’t remember or too confused to stand trail Not representative of typical murderers Low generalisability
30
Is a pet scan a reliable brain imaging scan and how does this affect reliability
Yes Objective and replicable results which can be tested Increasing reliability
31
What is the benefit of the continuous performance task used?
Standardised procedure Tested all brain activity Can be replicated High reliability
32
What is the weakness in pet scanning?
Reliability issues in 1990s Results often unclear Introduces subjectivity and low reliability
33
what type of validity does this study have and how
construct Raine findings tie in with findings of other brain imaging studies
34
how does the study have low ecological validity
CPT was artificial and unconnected to violence pps were doing unusual task in an unusual state of mind
35
how does the study show a reductionist view of human behaviour
only looks at brain activity and doesn't take into account any other factors like social/environment
36
why did most of the NGRIs agree to the test
to help their court case
37
if the NGRIs were not competent to consent who did and what problem does this arise to
lawyers presumptive consent
38
did all controls give prior consent to be tested and used in study
yes
39
what ethical problem does the tracer give
invasive medical procedure which was not necessary increases health risks of pp
40
how does the study go against social responsibility of ethical research
conclusions are misinterpreted assumption that violence depends on brain structure - inviting people to check they don't have a "murderer's brain"