radiolucent lesions Flashcards

1
Q

what to consider when coming up with differential dx

A

Patient demographics
* Sex, race, age

Clinical signs and symptoms
* Type, duration, etc.

Radiographic features
* Number, location, contents, size, borders, loculation, origin, relationship to adjacent structures, root resorption, displacement of adjacent structures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Midline radiolucency
Presentation:
* Male
* Aged 41
* Painless swelling palatal to 11 and 21
* 11 and 21 both restored and previous apicectomy 21

How would you describe the radiolucency? What is your differential diagnosis?

A

a circular, well defined radiolucency with radiopaque margin
typical cystic appearance

differential dx: radicular cyst (common) or nasopalatine cyst (less common)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how does the lesion relate to central incisors

A

apply horizontal and vertical parallax shift

radiolucency is slightly higher up in the occlusal indicating it is palatal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

any normal anatomical features which can help sway suspected dx?

A

Even though these teeth are root treated and 21 has a retrograde root canal filling, it does not automatically mean that they are the cause of a problem: specifically look for the periodontal ligament space – it is clear around 11 on the occlusal.
This was a nasopalatine cyst

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MUTLIPLE RADIOLUCECNIES
Male with no symptoms

Panoramic radiograph taken

Based on the dentition, what age do you think this patient is?

A

1st molar roots complete so not younger than 9

37 erupted so not younger than 12
* 37 roots not complete - so approx 14year

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

There are two radiolucencies in the posterior right mandible

Do you think these are 2 different things or are they related to each other?
What is your differential diagnosis/diagnoses?

A

appear to be seperate entities

  • circular, well defined approx 1cm in diameter, in position of possible 48 - all other 3rd molars developing so likely a normal tooth crypt
  • surrounds crown of unerupted 47 and too large to be a normal dental follicle - typical for dentigerous cyst
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Male aged 57
Referred to investigate radiolucency related to 38
Incidental finding on left bitewing radiograph by GDP (asymptomatic)
37 is vital & there is no notable expansion

What are your radiographic findings for the 38 region? What is your differential diagnosis for the radiolucency?

A

unerupted 38 - mesio-angular deep inpaction

well defined corticated radiolucency summetrtically surrounds crown and extends to mesial apex 37 - up to alveolar crest, co-incidence with the upper bornder of the IDC posteriorly and overlaps the canal anteriorly

differential dx: odontogenic keratocyst (esp as no expansion clinically), dentingerous cyst

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

any other radiolucenies in mandible (not around 38)

A

Small, well-defined, oval radiolucency below the right inferior alveolar canal, below 48. Maximum diameter of approximately 8mm.

The site (below the inferior alveolar canal) means that this cannot be odontogenic in origin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Second radiolucency at the inferior border of the right mandible

What is the most likely diagnosis for this radiolucency?

A

Its location (close to the angle of the mandible) and its “cystic” appearance are typical of a Stafne cavity.

The cross-sections and 3D reconstruction show the lingual position of the cavity very clearly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Male, 33y
Presented to GDP with painful swelling in left maxilla
* present for weeks
* Clinically there is an intra-oral swelling which is predominantly palatal
GDP extracted 24 & 25 but there was no resolution of the swelling

There is also a radiolucency in the mandible which is more obvious on the radiographs taken
How would you describe this mandibular lesion and what would be in your differential diagnosis?

A

46 is grossly carious and the radiolucent lesion encompassing the roots and causing resorption of the distal apex is likely to be inflammatory in origin.

Differential dx: periapical granuloma and radicular cyst

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What clinical and radiographic features raise concern?

A

Clinically the swelling was mainly palatal – this should raise concern as most odontogenic pathology related to upper teeth typically causes buccal swelling.

lesion in the L maxilla has caused a lot of alveolar bone destruction and we see a floating tooth (23) – this is a serious sign.

compare L sinus outline of the R maxillary sinus (know which bony margins/walls you are seeing)
* L cannot see the floor or medial wall –margins destroyed by either a malignancy or, less commonly, an inflammatory process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how to get defintive dx of this lesion

A

histology - high grade carcinoma of salivary gland origin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Male, 38y
Regular patient in Periodontology who had full mouth periapicals taken

Describe any radiolucencies you can see

A

periapical radiolucency related to 25.
* endodontically treated.
* radiolucency is a few millimetres in diameter, and well-defined with a radiopaque margin.

Probable diagnosis a periapical granuloma.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

One month later, at his second visit, the patient c/o tenderness in his upper left buccal sulcus
* A panoramic radiograph was taken and reported
* An occipitomental skull view was taken subsequent to this

Q2: What are your findings on these 2 radiographs ?
What needs to be done now?

A

floor of the L maxillary sinus posteriorly and the posterior wall inferiorly no longer exist; the L sinus is also a bit cloudy.
OM view shows the lesion within the L sinus and destruction of the lateral border.
Only a malignant lesion growing out from within the sinus, or, less commonly, an aggressive inflammatory lesion, would cause the bony destruction.
* The lesion needs to be biopsied

it was found to be a malignancy (adenoid cystic carcinoma).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

type of CT slice shown here
which is higher up

A

Both axial.

left is higher – the ramus is dividing into the coronoid and condylar processes at this level. The lesion occupies most of the left maxillary sinus and has caused destruction of the postero-lateral bony wal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Male, 15, Chinese
* Friend noticed swelling of lower right face
* Asymptomatic
* Firm but not hard swelling, buccal to teeth 45-47
* No previous treatment in this part of the mouth

Describe the radiolucency.

A

Large oval radiolucency in right mandible extending from 44 to distal of 47;
* well-defined margin, corticated in places;
* scalloped lower margin (a significant finding);
* root resorption and tipping of 46;
* lingual expansion;
* difficult to see what has happened buccally but no bone evident so probable destruction (as there is a clinical swelling).
* Although it is almost impossible to see on this particular panoramic image there is destruction of the ID canal.

46 is unrestored and non-carious, so there is no reason why there should be an associated inflammatory lesion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

any particularly significant findings - what would be differential dx?

A

scalloping and root resorption, and significant buccal expansion with bone destruction suggest an aggressive lesion.

Odontogenic tumours would be top of the list – this was found to be an ameloblastoma (based on the histopathology).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

50 year old male
c/o swelling in the anterior palate and a salty taste.
generally fit and well
examination shows a fluctuant swelling of premaxilla and that all teeth are vital

probable dx

A

nasopalatine duct cyst

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

histology of nasopalatine duct cyst

A

epithelial remains of the embryonic nasopalatine canal .

Respiratory type of epithelium originates from the nasal cavity; squamous epithelium from the oral cavity (non-keratinised)

20
Q

55 year old female
lower denture not fitting well
medical history is complicated
obvious swelling of left mandible intraorally, not fluctuant or painful

differntial dx

A

residual cyst
odontogenic keratocyst
ameloblastoma

21
Q

55 year old female
lower denture not fitting well
medical history is complicated
obvious swelling of left mandible intraorally, not fluctuant or painful

describe the histolopathology of this lesion

A

surface epithelium - has nests of epithelium
histologically like the developing tooth bud

mandibular odontogenic cyst - likely Residual cyst

22
Q

20 year old female
Small swelling buccal to tooth 35
The tooth 35 is vital

describe radiolucency

A

Well defined corticated radiolenecy on the mesial apical aspect of the 35

23
Q

describe histology features of this lesion

A

Cellular fibrous background
Red blood cells
Multinucleated giant cells

central giant cell granuloma.
* differnetials: hyperparathyroidism, cherubism, aneurysmal bone cyst

24
Q

what is this

A

radicular cyst or granuloma

25
what is this
ameloblastoma
26
what is this
giant cell granuloma
27
what is this
ossifying fibroma
28
what is this
periapical cemento-osseous dysplasia
29
what is this
cementoblastoma
30
what is this
dentingerous cyst
31
what is this
keratocyst (OKC)
32
what is this
ameloblastoma
33
3 imp radiolucent lesion seen at apex of tooth
radicular cyst/granuloma ameloblastoma giant cell granuloma
34
3 important radiopaque/mixed lesions
ossifying fibroma periapical cemento-osseous dysplasia cementoblastoma
35
3 important lesions at angle of mandible
dentigerous cyst odontogenic keratocyst ameloblastoma
36
radicular cysts formed from
hertwigs epithelial root sheath
37
dentingerous cysts formed from
reduced enamel epithelium (also eruption cysts)
38
ameloblastoma, odontogenic keratocyst, gingival cysts all form from
dental lamina
39
differentiating factors between odontogenic keratocyst and ameloblastoma
root resorption in ameloblastoma, more aggressive but it is benign (no metastases), typical growth pattern – ameloblastoma grows out in all direction whereas keratocyst grows in path of least resistance, ameloblastoma more in older ages (40s-50s) OKCs 20-30s * except unicystic ameloblastoma in younger adolescents; OKCs in older pts Gorlin-Goltz/Basal cell naevi syndrome
40
2 main types of ameloblastoma
unicystic/solid and multicystic
41
osteomas vs exostoses
both benign Osteoma – benign tumour of bone Exostoses – bony growth – not a tumour Exostoses - Occurs when younger, reach a size and stop Osteoma – benign tumour so continue growth (slow) Monitor if uncertain to see if any change in growth
42
15yo F * LR quad * 15yo * Slight expansion * Asymp OPT * Between 44 and 45 * Collection radiopacities differential dx tests needed impact of dx
Differential dx * Compound odontoma Tests needed * CBCT Impact – on Fixed appliance, root resorption,
43
55y F, radiograph taken to aid implant planning in mandible Asym no clinical signs on exam radiographic findings differential dx special tests needed
* radiopaque lesion between 44 and 45 * homogenous * well defined * no corticated or radiolucent border * no communication with PDL 44 or 45 differential dx - idiopathic osteosclerosis; sclerosising osteitis -* reaction to inflammation* tests needed - sensibility 44 and 45
44
40y M investigate fullness of left cheek Asymp no other clinical signs on exam Radiographic findings differnetial dx other tests needed
* Left mandible * Radiolucent large lesion in the body extending up the ramus to the sigmoid notch/base of coronoid * Doesn’t appear to be displacing or resorping the teeth * Thinning of lower corticated border of mandible (compared to RHS) * Pseudolocular * Slight scalloping of margin (hard to see on OPT) differential dx *** Odontogenic keratocyst** – due to not affecting teeth greatly and pattern of expansion (mandible shape still mainly intact) * Ameloblastoma * Solitary bone cyst – unlikely to be this size, few cms usually * fibrous dysplasia (due to swelling but unlikely to be this radiolucent and have margin) other tests needed - biopsy
45
33y M pericoronitis of 48 and absent 37-38 Otherwise asymp and no clinical signs on examination radiographic findings differential dx other tests needed
* 37 distoangular deep impaction * 38 aberrant /ectopic * Unilocular Radiolucent corticated lesion extending from ACJ of 37 up to root of 38 * IDC has been displaced inferiorly – still corticated and not compressed * 48 superficial horizontal impacted differential dx * **dentingerous cyst** * adenomatoid odontogenic tumour - *rare* * odontogenic keratocyst other tests needed - biopsy before tx (risks of daughter cysts and recurrece - so want to know before surgical plan)