Quizlet H&S Flashcards

1
Q

Abortion Act 1990 (3)

A

Allow abortion if:
- Pregnancy not past 24th week
- Continuation would cause risk of injury to physical + mental health of mother (including risk of life)
- Substantial risk child will suffer physical/mental abnormalities (to be seriously handicapped)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Anti-abortion arguments (4)

A
  • Termination of life of a foetus
  • Human foetus has moral status of an innocent person
  • Impermissible to terminate life of an innocent person
  • Therefore abortion = impermissible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Social factors leading to teen pregnancy (7)

A
  • Poverty
  • In care
  • Children of teen mums
  • Low educational achievement
  • Low expectations
  • Mental health problems
  • Crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Children Act 1989 and 2004

A

All organisations working with children have a duty in helping safeguard + promote welfare of children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Childhood accidents (3)

A
  • Major cause of death in children
  • Twice as many by accident than cancer
  • 6 times as many by accident than homicide
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does childhood health (/death) differ to abroad? (5)

A
  • Access to healthcare
  • Immunisation programmes
  • Quality of sanitation
  • Quality of diet
  • Warfare?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

National Service Framework (NSF) on Children and Young People: Key messages (6)

A
  • Tackle health inequality including poverty
  • Improve access to services and information
  • Focus on early intervention (eg SureStart)
  • Promote physical, mental and social wellbeing
  • Promote healthy lifestyles
  • Set standards
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

National Service Framework (NSF) on Children and Young People: Who are children in need? (6)

A
  • Drinking/substance-abusing parents
  • Runaways, orphans, children in care
  • Teen parents/young carers
  • Children who live with domestic violence
  • Young offenders
  • Children on child protection register
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Talking with children - techniques (4)

A
  • Age appropriate vocab
  • Turn-taking when trying to elicit information
  • Try to maintain a sense of humour
  • Eye-contact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Talking with children about illness + coping (6)

A
  • Honest
  • Information in understandable form
  • Don’t try to protect by concealing information
  • Encourage open communication
  • Opportunity for emotion + reassure feelings are normal
  • Educate about their disease
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

HIV Intervention strategies (6)

A
  • Blood donor + product screening
  • Promotion + distribution of condoms
  • Peer education for high risk groups (sex workers)
  • Promotion of safer sexual behaviour
  • Diagnosis + treatment STDs
  • HIV voluntary counselling and testing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Current problems with HIV intervention (3)

A
  • Africa struggle with debt
  • Global funds = under-resourced (UNAIDS, WHO, etc.)
  • Politics hinder outcomes as prostitutes are illegal and condom distribution not carried out
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Determinants of effective outcomes and interventions (HIV) (3)

A
  • Economics - small healthcare spend per capita (sub-Saharan Africa)
  • Priorities - cost-effectiveness of anti-HIV healthcare does not reflect developing world realities.
  • Setting - some countries have higher prevalence and incidence than others, government needs to be willing to spend on anti-HIV healthcare
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

HIV effect on population demographic in Sub-Saharan Africa (2)

A
  • Reduction in young to middle-aged adults population (yet children unaffected)
  • HIV infects sexually active people, approximately 10 year period to death, so they still have time to reproduce increasing population in children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

HIV problem to families (3)

A
  • Children become care givers, made orphans, become homeless and lack schooling
  • Poverty, child labour and child exploitation
  • Substantial psychological distress and discrimination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Calman-Hine report 1995 of cancer services (objectives) (7)

A
  • All patients = access to high quality care
  • Public + professional education to recognise early symptoms of cancer
  • Patients, families, carers given clear info about treatments + outcomes
  • Cancer services = patient centred
  • Primary care central focus of cancer care
  • Psychosocial aspects recognised
  • Cancer registration and monitoring
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Cancer incidence (2)

A
  • Generally increasing due to ageing population
  • Stomach cancer is showing decline in incidence?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

PSA test for prostate cancer/BPH (2)

A
  • Not accurate enough to be a screening tool
  • Helpful as diagnostic tool for men with urinary problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Cancers screened for: (3)

A
  • Breast
  • Cervix
  • Colon
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Multi-disciplinary team role in cancer (6)

A
  • Discuss every new diagnosis
  • Decide on management plan
  • Inform primary care
  • Designate key worker to each patient
  • Develop referral, diagnosis and treatment guidelines
  • Audit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

National service framework (4)

A
  • Improve standards + quality across healthcare sectors
  • Set national standards + define service models
  • Put in place programs to support implementation
  • Establish performance measures and measure timescales
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Cancer facts (6)

A
  • 1:3 life time incidence
  • 1:4 die of cancer
  • 270,000 deaths per annum
  • Cancer incidence in many tumours rising
  • Cancer mortality is declining
  • Cancer survival in UK = worst in Europe
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Most common cancers

A

Men: lung, bowel, prostate

Women: breast, lung, bowel

Children: leukaemia, brain, lymphoma, soft tissue sarcoma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Cancer reform strategy: 6 key areas for action

A
  • Prevention
  • Diagnose earlier
  • Better treatment
  • Living with + beyond cancer
  • Reducing cancer inequalities
  • Deliver care in most appropriate setting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Cancer reform strategy: 4 key drivers for delivery
- Using info to drive qualitiy and choice - Stronger commissioning - Funding world class cancer care - Planning for future
26
NHS cancer plan - networks 4
- Cover prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment + organisation of cancer services through cancer networks: - Model to implement - Bring together health service commissioners + providers, voluntary sector and local authorities - Each network serve 1-2 million people
27
Cancer network activities (4)
- Strategic planning - Implementation of national policies - Delivery of improvements in care of patients with cancer - Provide resources to enable network audits and research - Provide channel of communication across the network
28
Rule of Rescue (5)
- Theory to provide aid to identified victims of illness/accident - Public = more sympathetic to needs of a named person who is dying than an anonymous person - Not captured by QALYs as it aims to provide to all individuals in need - Opposes certain rationing methods - making it unsustainable - Contestable
29
Screening (5)
- Condition = important problem, risk factors known, primary prevention in place - Test = simple, safe, precise and acceptable - Treatment = effective and acceptable, policies on treatment in place - Program = RCT evidence of effectiveness, benefit to outweigh harm - Examples = Chlamydia, Down's, foetal anomalies, newborn bloodspot and hearing, sickle cell, etc.
30
SPIKES - Breaking Bad News
Setting Perception Invitation Knowledge Empathy Summary
31
ABCDE
Advance preparation Build relationship Communicate well Deal with patient/family Encourage emotions
32
Kubler-Ross Model of Grief (5)
Denial Anger Bargaining Depression Acceptance
33
Bowlby Model of Grief (4)
1. Numbing 2. Yearning/searching 3. Disorganisation 4. Reorganisation
34
Antibiotic use policies (5)
- Active surveillance and investigation - report outbreaks and epidemiology - Reducing infection risk - minimise use and time of use of catheters, tubes, cannulae (use aseptic techniques) - Reduce resevoirs of infection properly cleaned healthcare environment - High standards of hygiene - hand-washing, disinfection protocols - Pruduent use of antibiotics - preference to narrow-spectrum antibiotics
35
Decision support (4)
- Reminders - screening, vaccination, testing, medication reviews, risk factor analysis - Diagnosis - match signs/symptoms, highlight abnormal results, match patient with epidemiological studies - Prescribing - which drug, dosage, interactions - Disease management - remind about interacting conditions, NICE guideline support
36
Decision support specifics (2)
- GP support - define which cohorts of patients need recalling for medication and disease reviews, screening, etc. (a reminder systems) - Ottawa Ankle Rules - applied as a decision aid for excluding fractures of the mid-ankle and foot (diagnostic decision support)
37
Allocative efficiency
Investing in worthwhile interventions
38
Technical efficiency
Investing the interventions that make the best of scarce resources
39
Measuring outcomes of health interventions (efficiency)
- S-F-36 - EQ-5D health surveys - QALYs
40
Types of cost evaluation (4)
- Cost minimisation - Cost-utility - Cost-benefit - Cost-effectiveness
41
Cost minimisation (3)
- Only effective if all alternatives produce an equivalent effect - Choose lowest-cost intervention - Only analysis of cost is required
42
Cost-utility
- Combines multiple outcomes into a single measure (eg QALY) - Allows comparisons
43
Cost-benefit
- Links costs and outcomes and expresses them both in monetary units - Big problems in attaching a cost to well-being or even life itself
44
Cost-effectiveness
- Includes both cost and a single outcome measure - Allows comparison between interventions - Useful when same condition is examined with a signle primary outcome - Limited use when an intervention has many potential benefits
45
Quality adjusted life years (QALYs)
- A year of healthy life expectancy = 1, a year of unhealthy life = <1. - Williams 1985 if death = 0, possible for QALYs to be negative - Efficient healthcare intervention has a low cost-per QALY - QALYs are ageist, elderly have lower life expectancy, fewer available - QALYs for same treatments - if offered to younger patient
46
Dialysis advantages (5)
- Life-saving - Financial benefits - Medical, nursing, social worker contact - Relief from loneliness - Further social involvement
47
Dialysis disadvantages 6
- Depression and dependence on hospital personnel - Time consumption impact on social life (travel, clinics) - Limitation of movement - Restriction of fluid intake and diet - Reduction in income - Space required (CAPD)
48
Peritoneal dialysis 4
- Requires transport and delivery - Trained personnel - Space in house - Disposal arrangements
49
Incontinence stigma 4
- Distress - Embarrassment - Inconvenience - Self-esteem issues
50
Quality of life 3
- Association with morbidity - Depression - Institutionalisation
51
Transplantation adverse effects 3
- Non-compliance with immunosuppressants - Organ rejection - Patient continuing to drink alcohol/take drugs
52
Factors affecting transplantation option 5
- Availability of organ - Waiting list + other recipients - Compliance with anti-rejection medication - Likelihood of organ abuse - Likelihood of effective transplantation (match)
53
Sensitivity =
True positives/(True positives + false negative) True positives/All truly diseased
54
Sensitivity
High sensitivity = all cases are picked up, there may be false positives Negative result = highly suggestive of freedom from disease Probability of a positive if patient is ill
55
Specificity =
True negatives/(True negatives + false positives) True negatives/All truly free of disease
56
Specificity
- High specificity = all free of disease are labelled free, but there may be false negatives - Positive result is highly suggestive of disease - Specificity is probability of negative, if patient is well
57
Positive predictive value =
True positives/(True positives + false positives) True positives/All positives
58
Negative predictive value =
True negatives/(True negatives + false negatives) True negatives/All negatives
59
Dementia - what a patient notices? 3
- Forgetfulness - Clumsiness - Embarrassment in social situations
60
Dementia diagnosis impact on patient
Kubler-Ross model of grief (similar)
61
What the friends/family notice of pt w dementia 5
- Repetitiveness - Forgets social arrangements - Social withdrawal - Delirium - Confusion
62
Hospital rating systems
Star ratings: - Benefits - focus attention on national priorities, public reassurance, competition boosting performance - Detriments - unmeasured performance suffers, data manipulation, sacrifice of professional autonomy
63
Hospital rating criteria 8
- Wait for emergency admission - Wait for first cancer investigation - Finances - Cleanliness - Staff satisfaction - Waiting times - Clinical governance - Deaths within 30 days of surgery
64
Criteria to manage waiting lists
- Clinical urgency/severity, potential health gain, productivity and economic loss, space available and length of time waiting
65
Environmental Health agencies
- Environmental Agency - protects England & Wales - Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) - Scotland
66
Health changes by air pollutants
- Decrease in pulmonary functioning - Increased prevalence of respiratory symptoms - Sensitisation to allergens - Respiratory infections (rhinitis, bronchitis, pneumonia) - Occupational asthma
67
Air pollutants
- NO, NO2, SO2, CO - Environmental tobacco smoke - Formaldehyde - Infectious organisms - Particulate matter
68
Individual level (error)
Forgetfulness, loss of concentration, not paying attention, moral weakness
69
System level (error)
Inadequate education, lack of resources, poor quality equipment, unsafe environment
70
Preventing error
National reporting and learning system (NRLS) - for anonymous reporting, near misses and learning from mistakes Medicine and healthcare-products regulation agency (MHRA) - ensures medicines and equipments meet standards of safety, quality, performance and effectiveness
71
Knowledge-based (type of error)
Forming wrong intentions/plans as a result of inadequate knowledge or experience
72
Rule-based (type of error)
Applying the wrong rule at a familiar pattern
73
Skills-based
Attention slips and memory lapses, due to interruptions and distractions
74
Routine (type of violation)
Regularly performed shortcut due to poor system design, may be accepted over time
75
Reasoned (type of violation)
Deviation from protocol with good reason, due to time constraints, abnormal conditions and patient's best interests
76
Reckless (type of violation)
Deliberate deviation from protocol where harm is foreseeable and ignored, although not intended
77
Malicious (type of violation)
Deliberate deviation from protocol with intention to cause harm
78
Advance directives
Used to specify treatment if a person later loses their capacity to make a decision. Typically end of life decisions in patients suffering from degenerative cognitive impairment (Alzheimer's, dementia, Huntington's, etc.)
79
Test of capacity
- Understand + retain information that is relevant - Patient believes information - Patient can weight information from both sides and arrive at a decision
80
Pros of advance directives
- Gives legal right to refuse treatment when capacity lost - Respects patient autonomy - Encourages openness and forward-planning - May reduce anxiety of unwanted treatment
81
Cons of advance directives
- Therapeutic options may change after directive is established - Patient's questionable rationality about future interests - Possibility of coercion or mistaken diagnosis
82
Complementary therapies evidence?
- Thought to be a catalyst to change - Little evidence to support effectiveness at actually curing disease - BUT - self-healing thought to be triggered by therapies
83
Regulation of complementary therapies?
- Some have own regulatory bodies, practitioners must pass certain tests to prove safety - BUT, most don't have them, or are self-regulatory
84
BIG Five complementary therapies
- Acupuncture - Chiropractic - Herbal Medicine - Homeopathy - Osteopathy
85
Challenges to providing complementary therapies
- Statutory regulation of practitioners - Evidence of clinical effectiveness - Evidence of cost-effectivess - Provision of funds within the NHS
86
Negative considerations of vaccines?
- Adverse effects (media, friends, family) - Bad previous experiences - Child's emotional response to needle - Distrust in public information
87
Individual rights vs community health protection (vaccinations)
- People may think herd immunity = safest option (so child does not risk adverse effects of vaccine) - Reduces coverage and causes loss of herd immunity - Vaccinations are NOT a legal requirement for school entry - preserves individual rights
88
Sources of information on vaccines
- BNF - MIMS - Travel Doctor - NHS Choices
89
Herd Immunity definition
Significant portion of the population is vaccinated to provide a degree of protection to the population that is not immune
90
Herd immunity
Greater the proportion of resistant population = less likely a susceptible individual is to be exposed to an infected individual Disease control is attained when the effective reproductive number (R) is less than/equal to 1 90% coverage is required to allow herd immunity from a mumps outbreak
91
How is effective reproductive number (R) determined?
Susceptibility of the population, average number of secondary cases in absence of immunity (Ro)
92
Requirements for eradication of a disease
- No other reservoirs of infectious agent (animals/environment) - Scientific and political prioritisation of specific agent has to exist (money + time more available) - result of infection being serious and common - Examples of eradicated diseases - polio and smallpox
93
Notifiable diseases acts
- Certain diseases classed as notifiable and practitioners MUST inform local authority of these diseases - PUBLIC HEALTH ACT 1988 (infectious diseases) + 1984 (control of diseases)
94
Notifiable diseases info
30 notifiable diseases (in back of BNF) HIV not a notifiable disease - practitioners must take steps to ensure any sexual partners of infected patients are informed Examples - meningococcal meningitis, cholera, diphtheria, legionnaire's, MMR, tetanus, TB, whooping cough, yellow fever, etc.
95
Body image importance
- What we think of our own appearance and how we think others see our bodies Many factors - most important = - youth/old-age - weight/size - what is important is stereotypes that come with attributes
96
Medicine effects on body image
- Positive - plastic surgery for scarring, reconstructive surgery for cleft palate, medication for skin conditions - Negative - drug side-effects (thalidomide), cosmetic surgery problems, or certain reproductive techniques that can cause cleft palate/IUGR - Steroid treatment - weight increase, etc.
97
Palliative care definition
Regard management of pain and other symptoms as paramount, along with provision of psychological, social and spiritual support
98
Palliative care goal
Achieve best quality of life for patients and families when medical cure is unavailable
99
Supportive care definition
Helping patient to cope from pre-diagnosis, through diagnosis, treatment to cure (if treatable), or contiuing illness to death and bereavement
100
Palliative care team
- Primary health care team - Nursing homes - Social services - Specialist nurses - Specialist physicians (trained in palliative care) - Hospices - Marie Curie + Macmillan nurses
101
Marie Curie nurses
Care + support provided especially in terminal stage of cancer often in the home
102
Macmillan nurses
Care + support from diagnosis, working with other health care professionals
103
Future of palliative care
Important to remember that as technology advances a patient is still a person (not a stat) so maintain that death is not always a medical failure
104
Problems caused by excessive alcohol consumption
- Mortality + morbidity - Crime + public disorder - Social relationship issues - Occupational issues - Dependence/addiction - Resource consumption in NHS - Acute - accidents, poisoning, violence, suicide - Chronic - all-organ damage
105
3 main types of alcohol drinkers
- Hazardous - drink above sensible limits, but not yet harmed - Harmful - drink above sensible limits and experiencing harm - Dependent - drink above sensible limits and experiencing harm and symptoms of dependence (CAGE)
106
Alcohol-Drug link
- Alcohol generally found in complement to cannabis, other illicit drugs and mainly tobacco - To the point where increase in price of alcohol, can lead to decreased consumption of all of them
107
Why do people drink alcohol?
- Pleasure - Affordability - Marketing - Culture, social norms, peer pressure - Emotional and psychological issues
108
Alcohol harm reduction strategy for England (AHRSE)
- Provide better communication with public - Prevent + tackle alcohol's harms to health - Reduce alcohol-related crime and disorder - Work with the alcohol industry
109
Reducing harm from alcohol
- Population-based - price and tax controls, availability controls, advertising controls, education - Problem-based - fines, severe interventions for alcohol-related crime (eg drink-driving), drink-free areas - Controlling continued alcohol abuse - support groups, counselling, AA, medication
110
Why is food poisoning incidence rising?
- Changes in lifestyle and eating habits - Less time given to preparing food, eat-out more - Changes in food processing (minimal processing favoured) - Extended shelf-lives and pre-preparation - Changes in agricultural practices (intensive farming) - Fish farming changes - Improved reporting and diagnostic techniques
111
Food poisoning surveillance
- Notifiable illness under Public Health act 1984 - objectives of surveillance are; 1. prevention + control of contaminated products 2. knowledge of disease-causing agent 3. administrative guidance on how to control the situation
112
Reducing incidence of food poisoning
- Public education - Staff training - Food inspectors - Good quality raw materials - Use of fridges - Clean surfaces and clean water - Disposable equipment
113
Infection control - Epidemic Curves
Epidemic curves - used to graphically represent an outbreak, good for identifying certain aspects of outbreak: - Pattern of spread - Magnitude - Outliers - Timing - Exposure - Disease incubation period
114
R = Ro x S
R = Effective Reproduction Number Ro = Average number of secondary infections produced by a typical infective agent S = Portion of the population that is susceptible (not immune)
115
Ro (within R = Ro x S)
Average number of secondary infections produced by a typical infective agent Altered by infectivity of organism, duration of infectiousness and population density
116
S (R = Ro x S)
Portion of the population that is susceptible (not immune) Altered by immunity of the population (eg by vaccination or prior exposure)
117
Effects of R (R = Ro x S)
- R < 1: number of cases decreases - R > 1: number of cases increases so when R=1 (this is called Epidemic threshold)
118
Using R to form Herd Immunity Threshold
- To achieve elimination of a disease, R must be less than 1 - Set R as 1 in equation and rearrange it we can make 1 = Ro x S - Rearrange again to make S* = 1/Ro - S* is critical proportion susceptible - Herd Immunity Threshold = 1 = S*
119
Methods used by Infection Control Programme to control the spread of communicable disease
- Surveillance - Preventative measures - Outbreak investigation - Appropriate control measures - Education + training - Monitoring clinical practice
120
Examples of international immunisation programmes
- Expanded programme on immunisation (EPI) - Global polio eradication initiative (GPEI) - Global alliance for vaccines and immunisations (GAVI)
121
Parturition
Action of giving birth
122
Why would a mother wish to have baby in hospital rather than at home?
- Pail relief - Doctor's attendance - Safety - Cleanliness (contradictory) - Higher status (contradictory) - Care after birth
123
Leading cause of maternal death in UK
Suicide - thought to be caused by a mixture of exhaustion and hormonal changes
124
What can be done to prevent maternal suicide?
- Screening - management plans for at-risk mothers - use of mental health teams - psychiatrists in maternity units
125
Why is it beneficial to include non-English articles in a systematic review?
Language bias - statistically significant results are more likely to be translated into - English than non-significant results (BUT they are equally important when conducting a systematic review)
126
Why is it beneficial to include unpublished studies in a systematic review?
- Publication bias - occurs when publication of a study is influenced by its results, hence inclusion of only published studies may overestimate the intervention effect - Shown when drug companies conduct trials of their own drugs - not as good as they hope so they don't publish it
127
QALYs
- Measure of disease burden including both quality and quantity of life lived - Used in assessing value for money of a medical intervention
128
QALYs basis
- Based on number of years of life that would be added by intervention - Each year of perfect health = 1, to a value of 0 for death - If extra years are not lived in full health (eg loss of limb) = between 0 and 1
129
QALYs positives
- Good for rationing - Making best of scarce resources
130
QALYs negatives/objections
- Difficulty in measuring quality of life (how do you measure QoL of someone else?) - Who should decide on whether someone's QoL will be good/bad? (threat of bias) - Double jeopardy objection (person who needs treatment for something - eg cancer, may lose out due to another illness - eg arthritis that is unrelated) - For terminally ill with major disease - less than a normal patient with minor illness - always left without treatment - Ageism - older people = less QALYs
131
Lifestyle-based assessments
When deciding on who to provide treatment to (eg who to offer a transplant to) - lifestyle of recipient is taken into account to decide whether or not it may be more beneficial to give it to someone else
132
Pro-lifestyle-based assessments - Desert-based approach
Those who behave in ways that contribute to their ill health (eg smoking, taking drugs) are less deserving of treatment Justification looks backward at life of the individual
133
Pro-lifestyle-based assessments - Consequentialist-based approach 1
- Those who engage in behaviours that contribute to their ill-health are more likely to be deterred from such behaviour if they are denied treatment - Justification looks forward at the life of the individual
134
Pro-lifestyle-based assessments - Consequentialist-based approach 2
- Benefits of treating those who do not contribute to their ill health is likely to be more substantial and longer-lasting than others. - Justification looks forward at life of the individual
135
Anti-lifestyle-based assessments
- Many who engage in behaviour that contributes to ill health may not be responsible for their decisions - may have lacked knowledge it was dangerous. - Therefore unfair to punish someone for something he/she had limited control over - It is unclear whether the threat of non-treatment would deter an individual from behaviour that contributes to ill-health, particularly where there is addiction
136
Why is reproductive autonomy important?
- For many reproduction is a fundamental for living a life of value - having a family is one of the most important things - Restrictions on rights to start a family are considered very invasive and abuse of state power - Remember, not being permitted access to assisted reproduction therapy is different from forcibly sterilised by the state
137
Using preimplantation genetic diagnosis and IVF to create deaf children - Pros
- Deafness is only disabling because of the way society is organised - a couple could raise a child in a way that it means it will not be disabled - We all have fundamental interests in making reproductive choices and this is clearly something parents want strongly so should not prohibited from doing it - Child is likely to have a worthwhile life, no-one is harmed, people should do what they want
138
Using preimplantation genetic diagnosis and IVF to create deaf children - Against
- Deafness is disabling, given reality of society, intentionally creating a disadvantaged child - Even if child has a good life, its right to an open future has been violated and its future been constrained due to others - Not be permissible to deliberately deafen a foetus or an infant and this procedure amounts to the same thing
139
Child screening
- To be of benefit, must be aimed at detecting a disease that can be cured or for which subsequent impact can be lessened by early intervention - Tests employed should be accurate in order to avoid any undue anxieties from false positives, or missing cases through false negatives - Cost also important
140
Ante-natal screening
- Alphaferoprotein - raised in neural tube defects, allows more specific focus to those at risk - Down's Test - based on alphaferoprotein and HCG. Levels of these in conjunction with mother's age can be used to calculate risk. - Allowing for more invasive procedures (amniocentesis) - Ultrasound - check growth against estimated time of delivery and identify anomalies, cardiac and diaphragmatic hernia easily identified, smaller defects harder
141
Post-natal screening
- Phenylkenonuria (PKU) - aims to prevent brain damage from build-up of toxic phenylketones - Thyroid-stimulating hormone (congenital hypothyroidism) - hormones essential for neuron development - Immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) - cystic fibrosis
142
Post-natal screening - Newborn physical examination
- Check for any congenital abnormalities - weight - height - head circumference - plot centiles and hearing
143
Post-natal screening - GP 6-8 week check
- Heart murmurs - DDH - testicular descent - red reflex - vision/hearing - plot centiles
144
Post-natal screening - Health visitor/School nurse checks
6-9 month check - hearing distraction, gait 18-24 month check - walking gait, speech, Hb, plot centiles, educational needs 5-6 year school nurse check - vision, hearing, plot centiles
145
Healthcare commission
Promotes improvement in quality of both NHS and private and voluntary healthcare in England and Wales
146
National Service Frameworks (NSFs)
- Set national standards - create implementation strategies with an agreed timescale - to raise quality and reduce variations in service delivery
147
Social drift
Concept of an illness affecting a person's day-to-day life so that they can't continue to be within the social norm - due to employment, housing, etc.
148
Using research evidence - organisational barriers
- No financial incentive - Time constraints - Perceived lack of liability - What the patient expects
149
Using research evidence - professional barriers
- Clinical uncertainty - Over-confidence in own competence - Information overload
150
Using research evidence - social barriers
- Practice routine - Disagreement from superiors - Own medical training - Advocacy (eg drug reps)
151
Using research evidence - Strategies for change
- Education - courses and conferences - Audit and feedback - Reminders on computers - Mass media influence - Finance budgets
152
Using research evidence - conclusions
- Theoretical perspectives are useful when considering implementation - All interventions have the potential to help implement research into practice - No single approach is superior, we need all of them
153
Falls and Hip Fractures - risk factors
- Muscle weakness - History of falls - Gait, visual, balance deficit - Depth perception or contrast sensitivity deficit - Cataracts - Arthritis - Depression - Cognitive impairment - Impaired ADL - Age > 80 years
154
Falls and Hip fractures - consequences
- Psychological problems - Fear of falling - Loss of mobility - Social isolation - Depression and dependence - Disability - Institutionalisation - Impact on carers
155
Preventing falls
- Fall prevention (handles, walking stick, home assistance) - Hip protectors - Visual deficit correction - Treatment of osteoporosis (biphosphonates, vit D, Ca, HRT) - Gait training and balance exercises - Medication review (sedatives) - Postural hypotension check
156
Hip fractures large costs
- Treating fracture - inpatient costs - ward stay - remainder surgery - investigations - multiple minor injuries - dealing with the psychological issues (dependency, isolation, depression, carers, etc.)
157
'Long lie' in hip fractures
- When patient falls and is unable to get up to call for help so found a lot later - Serious and can lead to hypothermia, pressure sores, pneumonia and even renal damage due to muscle breakdown
158
Factors responsible for TB resurgence
- Urban homelessness - IV drug abus - Neglect of TB control programmes - AIDS epidemic
159
TB spreads super-easily because of:
- Crowded living conditions (easy airborne transmission) - Population with little native resistance
160
TB incidence disparity in areas of the world and areas within countries
- Incidence in Africa 10 times higher than America - Incidence in Birmingham 20 times higher than rural Hertfordshire
161
How to control rising rates of TB
- Vaccinate the population - Develop better diagnostic techniques - Treat with multi-drug therapy to prevent resistance
162
Decision analysis
- Works on Subjective Expected Utility Theory (SEUT) - divides a decision task into its components - Utilises decision trees to structure the task and adds evidence in the form of probabilities to examine risks associated with different options. - Then examines the utility or benefit/detriment achieved of each option and finally suggests the most appropriate decision
163
Stages of decision analysis
- Structure the problem as a decision tree - Assess probability of every choice branch - Assess utility of every outcome state - Identify option which maximises utility by working from right to left, multiplying the utilities by the probabilities
164
Decision analysis node shape significance
- Square nodes - decisions, represent choice - Circle nodes - chance, represent uncertainty
165
Decision analysis strengths
- Makes all assumptions explicit - Allows examination of the decision process - Integrates evidence into decisions
166
Decision analysis limitations
- Probabilities are often estimates - Estimates are subjective to overconfidence and bias - Often required data doesn't exist
167
Geoffrey Rose's 'Prevention Paradox'
A preventative measure that brings large benefits to the community offers little to each participating individual
168
Population Attributable Risk (PAR)
Portion of incidence of a disease in the population (exposed and non-exposed) that is due to exposure Incidence of a disease in the population that would be eliminated if the cause of exposure was eliminated, can be expressed as a value or percentage
169
Confounding
A situation in which a measure of the effect of an exposure is distorted because of an association of the exposure with other factors (confounders) that influence the outcome under study
170
Limiting confounding methods - Restriction
- Limit participants of study that have possible confounders - Means less data and can be difficult with multiple confounders
171
Limiting confounding methods - Matching
- Make comparison groups (with and without the confounder) - Used for things like age and sex in case-control studies
172
Limiting confounding methods - Stratification
- Analyse exposure with sub-groups of the confounder - Adjust for confounding (if there are few variables) - Recombine data - Means sometimes these sub-groups have very few participants in them
173
Limiting confounding methods - Multiple variable regression
- Coefficients are established for the confounder groups - Allows for better adjustment
174
Waiting times info
Waiting times are beneficial to NHS for a number of reasons, including as a way of rationing resources and making we make the best of resources we have
175
Example of reduced waiting times
Patient with suspected cancer must be seen within 2 weeks
176
How to measure waiting times
- Average (or median) waiting time of patients - Average (or median) waiting time for those on waiting lists - Number of people on the list - Proportion of those waiting more than X hours - Proportion of those on waiting list waiting more than X days - Time to clear the list
177
Initiatives to reduce waiting lists
- More doctors - Day case surgeries - Targets and penalties to practices - Performance and star ratings - Incentives to reduce lists - Other providers of care
178
Measuring pain
- McGill pain questionnaire - Self-report questionnaire - Visual analogue scale (VAS) - Pain diary - Clinical interview
179
Assessing pain in a clinical interview
- Take a full history of the problem - Explore effects on lifestyle (work, leisure, hobbies) - Explore effects on interpersonal relations (children, friends, partner - sex) - Explore effects on self-perception - Find if anything relieves or exacerbates it - Explore the patient's coping strategies
180
Gate theory (pain)
- Pain is carried in A delta/C fibres - gate theory implies impulsies carried in other (A beta) fibres can inhibit pain impulses - closing the gate - How rubbing a painful spot, or using a TENS machine works to reduce pain
181
Definition of bias
- Systematic introduction of error that can distort the results in a non-random way - Case-control studies are prone to recall bias, cohort studies are prone to selection bias
182
Outline process of evidence-based decision making in medicine
1. Convert need for info into answerable question 2. Identify best evidence with which to answer question 3. Critically appraise the evidence for its validity, impact and applicability 4. Integrate critical appraisal with clinical expertise and patient's unique circumstances 5. Evaluate our effectiveness and efficiency in carrying out steps 1-4 and seek ways to improve
183
Questions to ask when critically appraising evidence - Therapy
Was assignment of patients to treatments randomised?
184
Questions to ask when critically appraising evidence - Diagnosis
Was there an independent blind comparison with a reference (or 'gold') standard of diagnosis?
185
Questions to ask when critically appraising evidence - Prognosis
Was a defined representative sample of patients assembed at a common (usually early) stage in the course of their disease?
186
Questions to ask when critically appraising evidence - Harm/Aetiology
Were there clearly defined groups of patients, similar in all important ways other than exposure to the treatment or other cause?
187
RCT - how to praise validity
- Was assignment of patients randomised? - Were the groups similar at the start? - Aside from intervention, were the groups treated equally? - Were all entered patients accounted for? - Were all patients analysed in groups that were originally placed? - Were the patients and clinicians kept blind (very important with a subjective outcome)?
188
Observational - how to appraise validity
- Can you identify the main hypothesis and how does this match what you're looking for? - Is it an appropriate study design for the hypothesis? - How was exposure and outcome measured and could there be bias? - Was the assessment of outcome blind to exposure status? - Were confounding factors identified and were they accounted for?
189
Systematic Review - how to appraise validity
- Is this a systematic review of RCTs? - anything less than RCT is inadequate - What was the search strategy? - Studies with negative results or foreign languages are unlikely to be included - How was validity of individual studies assessed? - Are the results consistent from study to study?
190
RCT and Observational - how to evaluate results
- How large was the treatment effect? (relative risk, absolute, reduction, NNT or outcome difference on a continuous scale (PEFR, BMI)) - How precise was the treatment effect (confidence intervals)?
191
Systematic review - how to evaluate results
- Same as RCT and Observational +: - Can you interpret the results in a Forest plot? - Plot of meta-analysis results that easily shows variation between studies
192
How to evaluate evidence and use it? - RCT, Observational and Systematic Review
- Are my patients similar to those tested? - If the trial was held abroad, can it be applied in my setting? - Are those interventions feasible in my clinical setting? - Will the benefits outweigh harm in my patient?
193
Internal validity
Accuracy, how well the study was conducted, taking confounders into account and removing bias
194
External validity
Generalisability, how well it can be applied to different scenarios, patients and environment
195
Observational studies
Cohort and Case-Control - they do not intervene, only observe
196
Cohort studies
Find a sample that has been exposed to a certain exposure and follow that sample to observe the outcome; working forward in time
197
Case-control studies
Find a sample that already has a certain outcome, follow them back to find out if they were exposed to a certain exposure
198
Cohort studies negatives
- Often large, difficult to follow up large groups of patients, especially with something such as monitoring diet - Hard to conduct if length of time from exposure to outcome is very long (eg for some cancers) or if exposure you're observing is rare - Need to look out for confounders
199
Case-control studies negatives
- Often affected by recall bias - participant cannot remember when they were exposed, or their outcome changes their perception of the exposure - Or affected by selection bias - where control group has other factors that may influence their exposure
200
95% confidence intervals
Range of values that is 95% likely to contain the true value
201
Standard deviation
Value that shows how much variation there is from the mean
202
P-value
- Likelihood that the observed result is due to chance - P > 0.05 is not statistically significant
203
Odds ratio
Ratio of probability that something will happen, to the probability that it won't happen
204
Blinding
- Where some of the participants (patients, clinicians, researchers) are prevented from knowing certain information that may lead to conscious or unconscious bias on their part
205
Concealment of allocation
- Procedure for protecting the randomisation process; person randomising patients does not know what the next treatment allocation will be - Prevents selection bias affecting which patients are given which treatment (bias randomisation is designed to avoid)
206
Intention to treat analysis
Analysis based on initial treatment intended from allocation, not the treatment eventually adminstered (eg if a patient dropped out or changed treatment)
207
Treatment fidelity
How accurately the intervention is reproduced from a manual, protocol or model
208
Number needed to treat
Number of patients that are needed to be treated with the experimental therapy to prevent one negative outcome 1/ARR (absolute risk reduction)
209
Purpose of randomisation
- To try and ensure any characteristics of the sample population that may affect the results (confounders) are distribute equally between the study groups - Avoids selection bias
210
Length bias
- Occurs when length of intervals are analysed by selecting intervals that occupy randomly chosen points in time or space - Explains why cancers detected on screening may, on average, be more slowly progressive
211
Lead time bias
- Explains why survival following diagnosis is not a good measure of the effect of screening - Early detection through screening inevitably increases the period of time a person 'survives' with a diagnosis - all patients apparently gain the 'lead time' by which screening brings forward diagnosis
212
Primary prevention
Stopping a disease state from ever starting
213
Secondary prevention
Limiting the severity of outcomes that occur once a disease has begun
214
Tertiary prevention
- Reducing the consequences of outcomes that have occured - Rehabilitation is generally a form of tertiary prevention - for example a fracture has occured, but effective rehabilitation may be key to maintaining mobility despite fracture
215
Null hypothesis
- No difference between two trialled items/methods - Eg the effect of both drugs on symptoms is the same
216
Define bad news
News that negatively alters the patient's (or relative's) view of the future
217
Distancing/Distancing strategies
To avoid stress of breaking bad news, doctors may normalise the consequences of a diagnosis or falsely reassure the patient
218
Strategies for dealing with anger from patients
- Recognise/Acknowledge emotion - Remain calm - Do not dismiss it - Apologise and express sympathy
219
Benefits of visiting a patient at home, that might not be gathered in surgery
- Whether patient is caring for themselves - Whether patient is caring for one or more others - Patient's socio-economic status - Where patient keeps medication and how they go about taking it - Information relating to cleanliness/personal hygiene needs (whether fresh food in fridge, etc.) - Environmental factors that might make a difference to health care needs (eg steep stairs, lack of wheel chair ramps) - Any signs/indication of elderly abuse - Support from informal carers - Mobility related to ADLs (able to go upstairs to toilet/bed, make coffee/tea) - Cold, damp causing respiratory symptoms
220
Social services caring for elderly
- Give information on how to access help/support 1) Assess whether patient needs any help with ADLs - eg carers 2) Assess whether they are eligible for any financial support - Possibility/signs of neglect Assess whether any need for modifications
221
District nursing team caring for elderly
1) Assess whether patient/family need any nursing support 2) Assess whether a community occupational therapy assessment is necessary 3) Assess medication compliance/need for Dosset box 4) Discuss patient's nursing needs at MDT meetings 5) Administer immunisations
222
Dosset box
Multi-compartment medicine compliance aid - lots of compartments for each day, so patient knows what to take
223
Caring role adverse effects on mental/physical wellbeing
- Physically exhausted from having to help with ADLs - lead directly to injuries eg bad back or decreasing immunity - Increased risk of depression due to continual demands of being a carer and feeling isolated - Less time to attend to own health needs - Added poverty can impact on medical and physical health
224
Legal duty of care
Legal obligation on one party to take care to prevent harm suffered by another
225
Legal situation regarding doctor's duty of care to patient's when not at work
Outside hospital/doctor's surgery a doctor does not normally owe a duty of care if he did not attempt to help Doctors are not legally obliged to act as 'Good Samaritans' However, if doctor states they are a doctor or starts to act is if they are a doctor, then they will have taken on a duty of care to that patient
226
For successful negligence claim relating to treatment/diagnosis, 3 things need to be proven
- Causation - Duty: a duty of care existed between doctor and patient - Breach: the doctor's practice fellow below the standard of care expected
227
Two main ways causation can be assessed in terms of a negligence claim
- Whether the claim satisfies the 'but for' test: Basic rule of causation in common law requires the claimant to show that, 'but for' the defendant's negligence , he/she would not have been injured - Whether the claimant is able to establish on the 'balance of probabilities' that the negligent action caused the injury This requires the claimant to show that the injury was more likely to have occured as a result of their doctor's negligence than not
228
Other than law, what should inform doctor's decision to assist someone who needs medical treatment?
- Whether doctor has a moral obligation to assist - Whether doctor has a professional obligation to assist
229
Reason for polio change in policy (oral to injection vaccination)
- Reduced worldwide polio incidence - less risk of infection - IPV safer than OPV as it is not a live vaccine - Modern IPV is more effective than older types of IPV (but not more effective than OPV)
230
Fair distribution of healthcare resources - a 'needs-based' assessment
- Health economists identify 'need' on 'capacity benefit' - Antibiotics are 'needed' for treating bacterial sepsis as patients may benefit - Antibiotics are not 'needed' for treating a viral infection as patients cannot benefit Therefore: Resources should be distributed according to patients' capacity to benefit
231
Advantages of systematic reviews
- A rigorous summary of all the research evidence that relates to a specific question - By bringing together all the relevant evidence, disadvantages of single studies can be guarded against
232
Things to look out for in search strategy weaknesses
- English-language only - Only one database searched - Only publicated studies?
233
Studies being assessed during systematic reviews - two authors discussing disparities
Good practice because: - Assessing quality is important because studies with weaker designs will be less valid and can overestimate effects - Using two independent reviewers to assess quality makes it less likely that errors will be made - Using pre-agreed criteria helps make the process objective and transparent
234
Reasons that RCT is less subjected to bias than observational studies
- RCT groups are likely to be similar with respect to known and unknown determinants of outcome, therefore we can be more confident that any observed differences in outcome are due to the intervention - In observational studies, patient and clinician preference rather than randomisation determines whether a patient is allocated to intervention or comparison group - In absence of randomisation, greater risk of imbalance in both known and unknown determinants of outcome, so observed differents in outcome might be unrelated to the intervention
235
Meta-analysis
Statistical technique for quantitatively combining the results of multiple studies that measure the same outcome into a single pooled or summary estimate
236
Deductive argument
Intended to give logically conclusive support for the conclusion, as opposed to giving the conclusion probable support
237
Inductive argument
?
238
Valid argument
Needs: - Conclusion to follow logically from the premises - It to be impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false
239
Sound argument
Argument is sound if the conclusion follows logically from premises that are in fact true
240
What is most likely to be higher in hospital compared to GP in terms of diagnostic tests
Positive predictive value
241
What is standardisation?
Way to limit confounding, often used to control for differences in age groups when comparing rates of disease in two populations with different age structures
242
What is standardised mortality ratio (SMR)?
Ratio between observed number of deaths in a study population to the number of expected deaths
243
What is direct standardisation?
Required we know the age-specific rates of mortality in all populations under study
244
What is indirect standardisation?
Only requires that we know the total number of deaths and the age structure of the study population
245
When is indirect standardisation preferable?
Small numbers in particular age groups
246
Disease costing
- Illuminates total cost of disease, offers no evidence as to relative cost effectiveness of competing interventions that can be used to mitigate its burden on patients and society (so of little use to clinicians and policy makers)
247
Screening
- Use of a test to assist in identification of a disease or condition among people who do not have symptoms for that disease/condition
248
How might measuring BMI in school children be used?
- Overweight/Underweight children are identified and parents can take appropriate action - Schools take action to tackle obesity Importance of obesity is highlighted in the community - NHS and/or local authority have information that can be used to plan services to tackle obesity - Local obesity figures and performance can be measured
249
Disadvantages to individuals/society of screening programmes
- False positives results leading to anxiety as well as unnecessary interventions - Opportunity cost of the programme for the NHS (and individual) Increased diagnostic activity
250