Quiz S6 P2 Flashcards
Peace definition
Peace is the absence of violence or conflict, sometimes underpinned by a level of deeper equity and harmony
Can peace by determined simply by visible evidence?
No, it cannot be determined simply by visible evidence, such as the absence of violent confrontation
Negative peace definition
Involves merely the absence of active, organized violence by state and non-state groups
First stage in conflict resolution
When the aim is to stop immediate violence (negative peace)
Positive peace definition
Looks more deeply in what helps sustain peace beyond simply reducing or stopping violence. In positive peace there is no visible violence and no deeper social causes of conflict.
Theoretical viewpoints - Negative peace
Realists: The more natural state in an anarchical world order. States exist to protect and advance their own national interests. their priority is national security over peace for its own sake.
Liberalists: A desirable and realist first objective, perhaps to be achieved through diplomacy, negotiation and with the assistance of IGOs. A means to an end, rather than an end in itself.
Theoretical viewpoints - Positive peace
Realists: An unrealistic aim. It is natural for states to compete with each other. Equal status among nation states is bot impossible and undesirable.
Liberalists: The desired final state in all conflict situations, seen as realistic and achievable. Both sides will be willing to make big concession on core interest and seek to reconcile and forgive.
Theory of Balance of Power
States that national security is strengthened when military capability is distributed so that no single state is strong enough to dominate all others.
Power - Unipolarity
One great power / hegemony exists and cannot be challenged militarily by any other. Realists call this hegemonic stability theory.
Power - Bipolarity
Example: Cold War with USA and Soviet Union, never fought each other directly. Mutually assured destruction.
Power - Multipolarity
Current world order. Many powers are competing with each other and non-state groups are challenging nation states in armed conflict.
Realists on multipolarity?
Realists believe there is more instability.
Liberalists on multipolarity?
Liberals are more optimistic, nations working together in the common interest.
Democratic peace theory
Some theorists believe that democracy itself promotes peace. They note that conflict between democratic states is rare. It is suggested that in democratic states, there is a fairer balance of power and distribution of wealth and resources.
Peacekeeping definition
Means keeping people from attacking each other by putting some kind of barrier between them. Often this barrier is made up of neutral soldiers from the UN or a group of neutral nations. Soldiers simply keep the two sides apart.
Peacemaking definition
The process of forging a settlement between the disputing parties. This can be done in direct negotiations with two disputants, or with third-party mediator.
Peacebuilding definition
The process of normalizing relations and reconciling differences between all the citizens of the warring factions.
Conflict escalation and de-escalation model
- Difference
- Contradiction
- Polarization
- Violence
- War
- Ceasefire
- Agreement
- Normalization
- Reconciliation
(Dogs can play very well, cats are natural runners)
Third party intervention
Occurs when an impartial party intentionally enters the conflict situation with the objective of breaking into this conflict spiral to regulate or end its destructive course.
What does the entry of a third party do in an conflict?
Change the conflict structure and allows for a different pattern of communication to develop.
Conflict definition
Galtung: Actors in pursuit of incompatible goals
It is fundamentally about disagreement and competition over power, identity, resources, or territory.
Main reasons for a conflict being non-violent
- A legitimate structure or process for dialogue is in place, and everyone involved is using this,
- Democratic structures allow the population to be consulted. The results of these consultations are considered legitimate.
- The parties involved in the dispute are dependent on each other and would be harmed if the dispute became violent.
- Violent solutions are against the core interests of all parties.
Reason for violent conflict
- Lack of trust between both sides of the conflict.
- No structure exists for the dispute to be resolved peacefully, through dialogue or democratic reasons.
- Grievance and trauma are sustaining, and deepening the conflict.
- Violent approaches are seen as the only way to secure core interests.