Quiz 5 Content (Test 1) Flashcards
appellate jurisdiction
- appellate courts only have appellate court
- power to review
- can’t START a case here
- they don’t see π, Δ, witnesses
- only review the evidence from lower courts
- they don’t try the case, only REVIEW case
venue of court
- where is the most proper court in the state?
- where did the accident happen, where the π lives
- only choose venue in CIVIL cases
- criminal cases ALWAYS occur WHERE CRIME OCCURRED
criminal cases
- gov controls every criminal case (all crimes are STATUTORY)
a body rules that: - defines the conduct prohibited by the gov because that conduct threatens public safety/welfare
- sets punishment to be imposed for the commission of act
- purpose: PUNISH & DETER
civil victim cases
- body of rules that define PRIVATE rights & REMEDIES
- governs that disputed between individuals & biz’s
- purpose: NOT to punish, but to COMPENSATE
civil enforcement cases
- administrative law & hearings
- admin agencies ability to create & enforce regulation
- purpose: to carry out their STATUTORY DUTIES under the enabling states that created them
what is the style of cases (order)? criminal v civil v enforcement
- always π vs. Δ
- but appeals are reverse order
criminal: - *gov v criminal Δ
- *state v criminal Δ
- always against the government, the victim is only a witness
civil:
- *civilian v civilian
- *company v company
- no gov, only private matters
enforcement:
- *gov agency v Δ
who has control?: criminal v civil v enforcement
criminal:
- the gov, prosecutor (attorney)
civil:
- the victim
enforcement:
- the administrative agency
standards of proof: criminal v civil v enforcement
criminal:
- “beyond a reasonable doubt”
- >95% sure
- highest standard we have because imprisonment is no joke
- can’t convict if we have a doubt
civil:
- “by a preponderance of the evidence” or “more probable than not”
- >51% sure
- doesn’t matter as much if there’s a mistake since it’s just about paying $ and not jail time
enforcement:
- >51% sure, same as civil
5thA: criminal v civil v enforcement
criminal:
- on/off switch if you want to exercise your right (by not taking the stand)
- but if you take the stand you’re under oath and must answer EVERYTHING
- attorney can NOT point out that Δ didn’t take the stand
civil:
- subpoena, have to take the stand because it’s a court order
- question by question, if question could incriminate you, can say “I plead the 5th,”
- but lawyers CAN say (“did you notice they didn’t answer?”)
enforcement:
- same as civil
criminal remedies
1) fine
2) incarceration
3) death penalty
4) criminal forfeiture
5) criminal restitution
6) conditions (ex: good behavior, rehab, church, castration)
civil remedies
compensatory damages & punitive/exemplary damages, statutory damages, attorney’s fees, liquidated damages, family support obligations, equitable
money judgements at law
a judge recognized legal obligation that a person has to another to pay them a debt (paper IOU)
compensatory damages
- compensation for the injury
- need to prove your past damages and future (expert opinion)
punitive/exemplary damages
- if Δ acted w/ malice, can bring punitive
- don’t have to prove
- can ask for whatever you want
- U.S. is only country who has it
what are the 3 controversies with punitive damages?
1) excessiveness
2) wealthier Δ’s punished more severely
3) who gets the damages?