Quiz 5 Flashcards

Arguments, Fallacies, and Rules of Inference.

1
Q

Generalized De Morgan’s Laws

A

¬(∀xP(x)) ≡ ∃x¬(P(x))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Generalized De Morgan’s Laws

A

¬(∃xP(x)) ≡ ∀x¬(P(x))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Exactly One…

A

∃x(1?(x) ∧ 2?(x) ∧ ∀y[(1?(y) ∧ 2?(y)) → (y = x)] x, y ∈ ?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Exactly Two…

A

∃x∃y(1?(x) ∧ 1?(y) ∧ (x≠y) ∧ ∀z[1?(z) → (x = y ∨ z = y)] x, y, z ∈ ?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Argument

A

A connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Inductive Argument

A

An argument that moves from specific observations to general conclusions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Deductive Argument

A

An argument that uses accepted general principles to explain specific situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Valid Argument

A

Any deductive argument in the form of (p1, p2, p3…, pn) → is _____ if the conclusion follows from those hypotheses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sound Argument

A

A valid argument that also has a true hypothesis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Rule of Inference: Addition

A

p /∴ p ∨ q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rule of Inference: Simplification

A

p ∧ q /∴ p

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Rule of Inference: Conjunction

A

p, q /∴ p ∧ q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rule of Inference: Modus Ponens (“Method of Affirming”)

A

p, p → q /∴ q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rule of Inference: Modus Tollens (“Method of Denying”)

A

¬q, q → p /∴ ¬p

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rule of Inference: Hypothetical Syllogism (“Transitivity of Implication”)

A

p → q, q → r /∴ p → r

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Rule of Inference: Disjunctive Syllogism

A

p ∨ q, ¬q /∴ p

17
Q

Rule of Inference: Resolution

A

p ∨ q, ¬p ∨ r /∴ q ∨ r

18
Q

Synonym: “Syllogism”

19
Q

Universal Instantiation

A

∀xP(x), x ∈ D /∴ P(d) if d ∈ D

20
Q

Universal Generalization

A

P(d) for any d ∈ D /∴ ∀xP(x), x ∈ D

21
Q

Existential Instantiation

A

∃xP(x), x ∈ D /∴ P(d) for some d ∈ D

22
Q

Existential Generalization

A

P(d) for some d ∈ D /∴ ∃xP(x), x ∈ D

23
Q

Fallacy

A

An argument constructed with an improper inference.

24
Q

Fallacy: Affirming the Consequent

A

If Juan is in Dallas, than he is in Texas. He is in Texas. Therefore, he is in Dallas.

25
Q

Fallacy: Denying the Hypothesis

A

If Ingrid is in Dallas, she is in Texas. She isn’t in Dallas. Therefore, she is not in Texas.

26
Q

Fallacy: Begging the Question

A

I’m not lying so I must be telling the truth.

27
Q

Fallacy: Interrogation

A

Have you stopped annoying your spouse?

28
Q

Fallacy: No True Scotsman

A

No true American opposes tax cuts.

29
Q

Specious Reasoning

A

An unsupported or improperly constructed argument. (That is, an unsound or invalid argument.)

30
Q

Conjecture

A

A statement with an unknown truth value.

31
Q

Theorem

A

A conjecture that has been shown to be true.

32
Q

Proof

A

A sound argument that establishes the truth of a theorem.

33
Q

Lemma

A

A simple theorem whose truth is used to construct more complex theorems.

34
Q

Corollary

A

A theorem whose truth follows directly from another theorem.