Quiz 4 Flashcards
Emanuel and Louislyn approached Professor Joseph and requested him to be their God father during their marriage. Prof. Joseph agreed and the wedding was set on February 14. During the day of the ceremony however Prof. Joseph was not there. David, the driver of Prof. Joseph told Emanuel and Louislyn that Prof. Joseph is busy with his check-up but he was authorized to represent him during the marriage, and if Prof. Joseph will arrive in his house in the evening, he will just sign the marriage documents. The marriage was celebrated, and David later turned over the documents to Prof. Joseph for signing. In the marriage contract, it was stated that the marriage was attended by Prof. Joseph.
What crime did the David Committed?
a. Falsification of Document
b. Falsification of Public Document
c. Falsification of Private Document
d. Falsification of Official Document
e. Falsification of Commercial Document
g. Usurpation of Official function
f. Falsification of Wireless, Cable, Telegraph and Telephone Messages
h. Usurpation of Authority
g. No crime was committed
g. No crime was committed
Matthew leased his condominium to Louislyn for P12,000 a month. Louislyn failed to pay the rent for 2 consecutive months. Gabriel, the son of Matthew, prepared a demand letter falsely alleging that his father, Mr. Matthew had authorized him to collect the unpaid rentals and if she cannot pay, Louislyn will be evicted form her condominium. Louislyn paid the unpaid rentals to Gabriel who kept the payment.
What crime was committed by Gabriel?
a. Falsification of Document .
b. Falsification of Public Document
c. Falsification of Private Document
d. Falsification of Official Document
e. Falsification of Commercial Document
f. Falsification of Wireless, Cable, Telegraph and Telephone Mesages
q. Falsification of Medical Certificate
h. Falsification of Certificate of Merit
i. No crime was committed
c. Falsification of Private Document
Based on the same facts in Number 2, what crime did Prof. Joseph committed?
a. Falsification of Document
b. Falsification of Public Document
c. Falsification of Private Document
d. Falsification of Official Document
e. Falsification of Commercial Document
f. Falsification of Wireless, Cable, Telegraph and Telephone Messages g. Falsification of Medical Certificate
i. Falsification of Certificate of Merit
g. No crime was committed
c. Falsification of Private Document
Based on the same facts as number 2, what if David signed the documents instead of Prof. Joseph. What possible crime did David committed?
a. Falsification of Document
b. Falsification of Public Document
c. Falsification of Private Document
d. Falsification of Official Document
e. Falsification of Commercial Document
f. Falsification of Wireless, Cable, Telegraph and Telephone Messages
g. Usurpation of Official function
h. Usurpation of Authority
i. No crime was committed
b. Falsification of Public Document
Ten Korean tourist were about to depart from the Philippines. Upon passing through immigration and customs preparatory to their departure for South Korea at the Clark International Airport. They were stopped by immigration official when it was discovered that Mr. Kim Maro Uti was with his luggage One Million pesos consisting of P500,000 One thousand paper bills and P500,000 twenty peso coins. One of the ten Korean tourist Mr. Park Ing Go, tore up the bills and threw the coins on the airport floor. What crime did Mr. Pank Ing Go committed?
a. Falsification of Document
b. Falsification of Public Document
c. Falsification of Private Document
d. Forgery
e. Mutilation of Bills
f. Mutilation of coins
- Counterfeiting 247
h. PD 247
i. No crime was committed
h. PD 247
The Tambay of Barangay Talaga, Capas were playing cara y cruz, before they throw the coin in the air they would rub the money to the sidewalk thereby diminishing the intrinsic value of the coin. What crime was committed?
a. Forgery
b. Mutilation of Bills
c. Mutilation of coins
d. Counterfeiting
e. PD 247
f. No crime was committed
e. PD 247
When the image of Andress Bonifacio on a five-peso COIN is transformed into that of Paolo Ballesteros. What Crime was corfive-peso
a. Forgery
b. Mutilation of Bills
C. Mutilation of coins
d. Impossible crime Counterfeiting
e. PD 247
g. No crime was committed
e. PD 247
When the image of Manuel A. Roxas on a one hundred peso BILL is transformed into that of Paolo Ballesteros. What Crime was committed?
a. Forgery
b. Mutilation of Bills
c. Mutilation of coins
d. Impossible crime
e. Counterfeiting
f. PD 247
g. No crime was committed
f. PD 247
An old woman who was a cigarette vendor in Tarlac City Palengke refused to accept twenty five-centavo coins for payment of the vendee of cigarettes he purchased. Then came the police who advised her that she has no right to refuse since the coins are of legal tender. On this, the old woman accepted in her hands the forty pieces of twenty five-centavo coins and then threw it to the face of the vendee and the police. What crime was committed by the old woman?
a. Forgery
b. Mutilation of Bills
c. Mutilation of coins
d. Impossible crime
e. Counterfeiting
f. PD 247
g. No crime was committed
f. PD 247
An old man, in his desire to earn something, scraped a digit in a losing sweepstakes ticket, cut out a digit from another ticket and pasted it there to match the series of digits corresponding to the winning sweepstakes ticket. He presented this ticket to the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office. But the alteration is so crude that even a child can notice that the supposed digit is merely superimposed on the digit that was scraped. What is the crime committed by the old man?
a. Falsification of Document
b. Falsification of Public Document
c. Falsification of Private Document
d. Forgery
e. Mutilation of Bills Impossible crime
g. Counterfeiting
h. PD 247
- No crime was committed
h. PD 247
. Can the writing on the wall be considered a document?
a. Yes, because it is a writing
b. Yes, It is capable of speaking of the facts stated therein.
c. No, because it is not written on a paper
d. No, because it is not hand written
e. Only choices A and B
f. Only choices C and D
e. Only choices A and B
In a case where a lawyer tried to extract money from an old woman by typing on a bond paper a subpoena for estafa amounting to 50,000. The old woman agreed to pay. The old woman went to the prosecutor’s office to verify the exact amount and found out that there was no charge against her. The lawyer was prosecuted for falsification. He contended that only a genuine document could be falsified. Is the Lawyer correct?
a. Yes, because he is a lawyer
b. Yes, because only genuine document maybe falsified
c.No, whether the document is genuine or not, falsification of document may be had.
d. No, because false documents may be falsified
e. Only choices A and B
f. Only choices C and D
f. Only choices C and D
Mr. Joseph and Ms. Zabeth enters a movie house which is a public place and then goes to the darkest part of the balcony and while there the Joseph started performing acts of lasciviousness on Zabeth and they mutually enjoyed. What crime was committed by the Joseph?
a. Acts of lasciviousness (pambabastos)
b. Grave scandal
c. Illegal Cockfighting
d. Vagrancy and prostitution
e. No crime was committed
b. Grave scandal
Under the same facts in number 12, what if the only Joseph and Zabeth were the only customer that day at the movie house. What crime they may be charged?
a. Acts of lasciviousness (pambabastos)
b. Grave scandal
c. Illegal Cockfighting
d. Vagrancy and prostitution
e. No crime was committed
b. Grave scandal
. In a certain apartment, a Ms. Louislyn a tenant had the habit of undressing in her room without shutting the blinds. She does this every night at about eight in the evening. So that at this hour of the night, you can expect people outside gathered in front of her window looking at her silhouette. What crime did Ms. Louislyn committed if any?
a. Acts of lasciviousness (pambabastos)
b. Grave scandal
c. Illegal Cockfighting
d. Vagrancy and prostitution
e. No crime was committed
b. Grave scandal
