Quiz 3 Flashcards
Intentional Tort: Assault
Threatening words or acts
No physical contact necessary
Intentional Tort: Battery
Completion of Assault
Physical contact
Intentional Tort: Defamation
False Statement of Fact
Oral breach: Slander
Printed/Media breach: Libel
To establish Defamation:
- False statement of fact made
- Statement harmed reputation
- Statement published to one other person
- If plaintiff is a public figure, actual malice needs to be proved
Damages for Libel:
Compensation for things like humiliation and emotional distress
Damages for Slander:
Economic Loss needs to be proved
Exception for damages for slander:
Slander per se: no proof of damages necessary when the statement involves something like a serious crime
Defenses to defamation:
- The truth
2. Absence of Malice (for public figures)
Intentional Tort: Trespass to Land
Occurs when someone:
- Enters land
- Causes something to enter land
- Remains after being asked to leave
Harm to land isn’t necessary
Reasonable Duty of Care
Landowner must warn about dangers that aren’t apparent, like guard dogs
Attractive nuisance doctrine
Landowners may be liable for objects that attract children, like swing sets
Defenses to Trespass
- Trespass is necessary to assist someone in danger
2. Trespasser is a licensee like national grid
Intentional Tort: Trespass to personal property
Interference with someone’s personal property without consent
Types of trespass to personal property:
- Conversion: permanently deprive owner of their property
- Failure to return goods: don’t give back property that was borrowed
- Disparagement of Property: think of defamation, it’s basically defamatory statements about someone’s property that injure them economically
Intentional Tort: Wrongful interference with a Business Relationship
- There’s an established business relationship
- Defendant uses predatory methods to end relationship
- Plaintiff suffers damages
Negligence
Failure to live up to a required duty of care
Intent not required, only creation of risk/harm
For Negligence, Plaintiff must prove:
- Duty: defendant owed plaintiff a duty of care
- Breach: defendant breached duty of care
- Causation in Fact: “But for” test
- Proximate Cause: there needs to be a strong enough connection between the negligent act and the injury caused
- Compensatory Damages: reimbursement for actual losses
- Punitive Damages: punish tortfeasor and deter others
Defenses to Negligence
- Assumption of Risk: plaintiff new risk and engaged in act anyways (like if they signed a waiver)
- Superseding Cause: something happens that breaks the causal connection between act and injury
- Contributory Negligence: If plaintiff caused their injury in any way, they can’t recover
- Comparative Negligence: apportions damages
Pure: plaintiff recovers even if their liability is greater than defendant
50% Rule: plaintiff recovers only of their liability is less than 50%
Negligence Per Se
Defendant breeches a safety statue meant to protect plaintiff (lack of smoke detector)
How do you win a Products Liability Lawsuit?
- Negligence: Manufacturer fails to exercise reasonable standard of care in making the product
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation: fraud made knowingly or with reckless disregard
- Strict Liability: holds manufacturers, sellers, and lessors liable for results of their acts, regardless of intentions or exercise of reasonable duty of care
Requirements for Strict Liability
- Product defective when sold
- Defendant’s in the business of selling the product (can’t be something you bought at a garage sale)
- Product is unreasonably dangerous
- Plaintiff harmed physically
- Defective product caused the harm
- Product hasn’t been changed since it was bought
Who can recover in products liability lawsuits?
Basically anyone affected by the product
What makes a product unreasonably dangerous under Strict Liability?
- Manufacturing Defects: product is safe as designed, but there’s a manufacturing mistake that makes it dangerous
- Design Defects: product is dangerous as designed, even if it’s manufactured correctly
- Inadequate Warnings: defective based on inadequate warnings
Foreseeable Misuse: if misuse is foreseeable, warnings required
Obvious Risks: you don’t need to warn from obvious risks
Crimes of Theft: Burglary
Entering a building to commit a felony
Aggravated burglary when deadly weapon is used Or when the building entered is a dwelling