Quiz 3 Flashcards

1
Q

What is Statistical Conclusion Validity and relevance to psychology?

A
  • The validity with which we can infer that the IV and DV covary
  • Inferential statistics allow us to establish this type of validity
  • Small sample size is a threat to statistical conclusion validity (it can keep you from finding a relationship between the IV and DV when one really exists)

RELEVANCE:
- establishes if researchers inference about co variation is shown to be correct (statistically significant)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Construct Validity and relevance to psychology??

A
  • degree of agreement between theoretical concepts and specific measuring device or procedure.

RELEVANCE:
- if what you are testing and the procedure you are using is accurate in the outcome/ results of the experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Participant reactivity to Experimental

A
  • the way the participant perceives the study

Ex: participant can be more sensitive or receptive to treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Experimenter Effect

A
  • Pygmalion effect/ the phenomenon where higher expectations lead to an increase in performance.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Compensatory Rivalry

A
  • when the control group responds negatively because they found out that they were put in the control group which can lead to competiveness against the treatment group.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Internal validity

A
  • Refers to rigor with which study was conducted.

Ex: how well it was designed and how well the study works.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

History

A
  • event occurring during study but before posttest/outcome measurement

EX: HIV/AIDS prevention & Magic Johnson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Differential History

A
  • event occurring during study not experienced by both groups.

EX: only one group experiences the event occurring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Maturation

A

Growing out of it. People’s opinion change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Instrumentation

A
  • Changes in way the DV is measured during the course of study.

EX: Autism/Autism Spectrum Disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Testing

A
  • Pre-test affects post-test scores.

EX: studying between tests increase positive outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Regression Effects

A
  • Pseudo effects assumed to be due to the IV but really due to regression to mean

EX: selecting one extreme aspect you are trying to study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Selection of Participants

A

Randomly selection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Attrition

A

People drop out!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Differential Attrition

A
  • cluster sampling, more men than women drop out/ uneven amount.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

External Validity

A

-generalizing findings to people, setting, treatments, outcomes, time outside of study. It goes from specific to general

RELEVANCE: the principle goal of psychological research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Population

A
  • generalize from sample to larger population

RELEVANCE: knowing if you can transfer your collected date from the sample to the entire population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Ecological

A
  • generalize across settings.

RELEVANCE: seeing if you can transfer data to different settings.

19
Q

Temporal

A
  • generalize across time/seasons.

RELEVANCE: Transferring the collected data throughout time and seasons to see the validity within.

20
Q

Treatment Variation

A
  • generalize across variables in treatment
21
Q

Outcome

A
  • generalize across related dependent variable.
22
Q

Weak Designs

A
  • design with no pretest

RELEVANCE: no starting point in psychological research.

23
Q

One-group post-test only

A
  • weak design because there is only one group so there’s nothing to compare to.
24
Q

One-group pretest-post-test

A
  • one single group experiences treatment and post treatment assessment

(Con: it cannot effectively evaluate effectiveness of treatment/intervention without pretest)

RELEVANCE: It is sometimes a necessity in health research
Posttest only with nonequivalent groups

25
Q

Non-equivalent groups

A
  • not the strongest design and both non-equivalent groups have no similarities/no connections.

Ex: stress induced test to social class experiment, it is a mistake because the lower class is always usually stressed.

(CON: no pretest and pretest will help in saying why these two groups are non-equivalent)

26
Q

Strong Experimental Designs

A
  • Between participant designs
  • Within participant designs
  • Mixed designs
  • Pretest-posttest control group design
27
Q

Between participant designs

A

comparing one or more experimental groups or comparing one or more experimental groups with the control group

(EX: compare students with classical vs. jazz background or classical, jazz, and white noise) (Pro: increases test performance)

28
Q

Within participant designs

A
  • repeated measure design/ one or more participant going through multiple trials and posttest after each trial.

(EX: healthy community study)

(PRO: control error factor/minimal error factor)

(CON: run the risk of something making the groups perform differently, being exposed repeatedly for intervention, using subject as own control group)

29
Q

Mixed designs

A
  • design format that includes both between-group design and within-participant design.

(EX: three neighborhoods: upper, middle, and lower and 16 stores)

(CON: everyone can have a different interpretation about the amount for each social class) (the between group would be the income and the within design would be the time/ Phase I: 2013-2014/ Phase II: 2014-2015

30
Q

Pretest-posttest control group design

A
  • Factorial designs
31
Q

Main Effects

A
  • influence of 1 independent variable on dependent variable
32
Q

Interaction effects

A
  • is there something that is changing the effect of the independent variable
33
Q

Row means

A
  • means from level of independent variable
34
Q

Cell Means

A
  • average of people in cells
35
Q

Two-way interactions

A
  • where the two lines of the graph intersect
36
Q

Within subject’s factorial with independent variables

A
  • All subjects get all conditions
37
Q

IRB: Institutional Review Board

A
  • the committee at your university that reviews research proposals in order to ensure adequate protection for the people that will be participating in the study.

RELEVANCE: ensuring that every research study conducted is ethical.

38
Q

Selecting samples

A
  • something that justifies who you are choosing and why
39
Q

Informed Consent

A
  • ensuring the research participant is aware of all potential risk and cost involved in a treatment or procedure.
  • Scheduling research participants
  • Determining sample size
  • Design and selection of instruments
  • Debriefing
40
Q

Threats to Construct Validity

A
  • Participants reactivity to the experimental situation
  • Research participants’ motives and tendencies that affect their perceptions of the situation and their responses on the dependent variable
  • Influenced by the demand characteristics
  • any of the cues available in an experiment, such as instructions, rumors, or setting characteristics that influence the responses of participants
  • primary motive— positive self-presentation (participants frequently want to respond in such a way as to present themselves in the best way possible; may try to guess what the experimenter “wants” and responds in that way)
  • Experimenter effects
  • actions and characteristics of researchers that influence the responses of participants
  • can be intentional and unintentional
  • Experimenter’s motive of supporting the study hypothesis can lead to bias
  • Ways experimenter may bias the study:
  • experimenter attributes
  • biasing experimenter effects attribute to the physical and psychological characteristics of the researcher
  • 3 categories
  • e.g., experimenter’s age, gender, race, religion
  • e.g., experimenter’s anxiety level, need for social approval, hostility
  • e.g., prior contact between experimenter and participant, is the experimenter naive or experienced
  • experimenter expectancies
  • biasing experimenter effects attributable to the researcher’s expectations about the outcome of the experiment
  • e.g., experimenter acts differently towards experimental vs. control group to influence study to support their hypothesis
41
Q

Threats to Internal Validity

A
  • History
  • Differential History
  • Maturation
  • Instrumentation
  • Testing
  • Regression Artifact
  • Attrition
  • Differential Attrition
  • Selection
  • Additive and interactive effects
42
Q

Quasi Experimental Design

A
  • Research procedure in which the scientist must select participants for different conditions from preexisting groups. Different from true experiment because you don’t have random assignment. You still have manipulation
43
Q

Problems with Quasi Experiment

A
  • preexisting differences b/w groups (You can pretest differences on DV and find out if they do differ significantly) IV and group membership (often a subject variable) confounded when participants assigned to conditions based on group membership