Quiz 2 Flashcards
what are arguments by analogy?
is an argument that relies on RELATIVE SIMILARTY between two things, to draw a conclusion that because these things are the same we should treat them the same
Explain the child at the well story from Mengzi
Is a story Mengzi uses to illustrate the INHERENT GOODNESS OF PEOPLE. Mengzi believes that if you saw a child fall walking to the well/falling in the well we would all feel some sort of COMPASSION and ALARM
however Mengzi (in this story) is not concerned with the ACTION but rather the REACTION as an illustration of inherent good nature
explain the Man from song story from Mengzi
is a story Mengzi uses to explain the CULTIVATION OF GOODNESS.
The man from song is a grain farmer who tries to yank on his grain to make it grow taller. This does not work and ultimately kills the grain.
shows you cannot achieve growth through impatience. But rather, through careful cultivation (watering, fertilizing, etc.) will one have a successful yield
explain the sister in law analogy from Mengzi
is a story Mengzi uses to illustrate people NATURAL MORAL INSTINCTS an how it challenges PROPRIETY depending on circumstance.
Mengzi explains that if one were to see their sister in law falling into a well, their reaction would be to reach out and grab her hand to pull her to safety. However this goes against propriety as a brother in law is not supposed to tough a sister in law. But, the circumstances of her certain death override the norm and compel one to break norms in order to act ethically.
explain the water analogy from Mengzi
Is an analogy used in an argument of basic human nature between Mengzi and Gaozi
Gaozi believes that human nature is morally neutral and is like water. Will flow freely east or west (good or bad) depending on it’s influences
However, Mengzi argues that human nature is like water except it’s nature is to flow downwards (good) and then circumstance (ie splashing) is what makes it move upward (bad)
explain the willow tree analogy from Mengzi
is an analogy Mengzi uses in an argument with Gaozi to describe Human Nature
Gaozi believes that human nature is like a willow tree. It is merely RAW MATERIAL to him. Morally neutral but can be carved into secondary products which are representative of good principles.
However, Mengzi believes Gaozi is wrong because in his theory you would be destroying the human nature in order to arrive at the good principles.
explain the Ox mountain story from Mengzi
is a story Mengzi uses to explain that human nature is like Ox Mountain and is changed by CIRCUMSTANCES
Naturally ox mountain is full of beautiful vegetation (good principle/will), but people came to the mountain and chopped down the trees, and animals came and ate all the vegetation (circumstance) this left ox mountain perpetually barren (bad)
explain the Meat analogy from Mengzi
Is an analogy mengzi uses to describe the consistent nature of humans. He says that all people prefer similar flavors which says something about the consistency of human nature
what is is “losing heart” as described by Mengzi and what is the impact of social conditions to it?
simply put when one has a value they “have heart” but when one begins to fail to recognize those values and strays from it then the are “losing their heart”
however he believes that social condition has a huge role to play in losing ones heart (ox mountain) and he believes that regaining heart is always possible
Explain the implementation chart for character ethics (aka Mengzi)
- criterion of judgement (arete): is it/am I virtuous
- procedure/application (phronesis): cultivation
- moral motivation (eudaimonia): flourishing
what are the basic features of care ethics as described by Noddings?
-All people are obligated to act morally
-to be human is to care
-any person can be morally educated (except in cases of sociopathy, etc.)
-the ethical ideal guides much or moral behavior
OR
-it is concerned with the self and others
-it takes us as we are
-it limits obligations
what is natural caring as opposed to ethical caring?
natural caring: “I want” and “I must” are the same, no ethical effort is required (parent and child relationship), foundational for ethics
ethical caring: “I want” and “I must” diverge, therefore, more effort is put into acting ethically
explain what an ethical ideal is
the ethical ideal is just the picture of our best self, is different depending on the person
explain Nodding’s view of selfhood
the self worth s tied to the ability to live up to the ethical ideal and who we are defines our obligation
what is obligation according to Noddings?
what does she believe are the limitations on obligation?
Obligation is defined by who we are and we are obligated to care for others as long as we are in relation with them or have any potential to have a relationship with them
Obligation is limited by…
1. existence of or potential for relation
2. nature of potential relation
3. Working toward a relationship?