QUIZ 2 Flashcards

1
Q

form

A

form of speech sound- phone
phone- actual production; no meaning attached

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

function

A

speech sound function- phoneme
phoneme- smallest unit that distinguishes meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the basic requirements for meaningful utterances in any language?

A

form and function

form and function need to work together to signal meaning and be intelligible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why consider phonological theories?

A

theories:
- are practical
- guide and direct clinical work (assessment and interventions)
- offer a variety of clinical possibilities (different perspectives)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

distinctive feature

A

any property that separates a subset of element from a group

in phonology- create a distinction between the sounds we use in speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

distinctive sound features

A

demonstrate similarities and disimilarities among phonemes

binary system
(+) indicates PRESENCE of certain features
(-) indicates ABSENCE of certain features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the 5 features that establish and distinguish among phonemes? (Chomsky and Halle)

A

major class features
cavity features
manner of articulation features
source features
prosodic features- WE ARE NOT GOING TO COVER THIS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

major class features

A

sonorant, consonantal, approximants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

sonorant

A

open vocal tract- promoting voicing
vowels, nasals, and approximants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

consonantal

A

sounds produced with a high degree of oral obstruction
plosives, fricatives, affricates, approximants and nasals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

approximants

A

sounds produced with oral obstruction not higher than required for the high vowels [i] and [r]
vowels and approximants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cavity features (place of articulation)

A

coronal- blade of the tongue raise from its neutral position

anterior- sounds produced in the frontal region of the oral cavity with the alveolar ridge being the posterior border (labial, dental, and alveolar consonants)

nasal- open nasal passageway

lateral- lowered lateral rim portions of the tongue (sound leaving from sides of tongue)

high- high tongue position

low- low tongue position

back- retracted body of the tongue - velar and glottal sounds

rounding- lip rounding [w]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

manner of articulation features

A

continuant- sounds produced without hindering the airstream with any blockages in the oral cavity
[+ continuants]- vowels, fricatives and approximants
[- continuants]- plosives, nasals, and affricates

delayed release- sounds produced with a slow release of a total obstruction within the oral cavity
- affricates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

source features

A
  1. voiced- produced by simultaneous vf vibration (all vowels are voiced)
  2. strident- making a loud or harsh sound ( acoustic features of sound)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

maximal opposition approach

A

if we see a lot of speech sounds are missing, we pick 2 phonemes that are very distant from each other (most distinctive from each other)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

generative phonology

A

outgrowth of distinctive feature theory
two levels of sound representation:
1. surface level representations- the actual productions (what the child produced)
2. deep structure- abstract underlying ‘features’ of such production

IDENTIFY THE CONTEXT IN WHERE THE CHANGE IS MADE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

naturalness and markedness: Chomsky and Halle (1968)

A

toddlers tend to make similar substitutions; this makes us think that some speech sounds are easier than others

18
Q

natural phonemes

A

easier to produce; more common across different languages (labeled unmarked)

19
Q

marked phonemes

A

more difficult to produce and occur LESS often in languages across the world

20
Q

implicational universals

A

theoretically speaking if the child produces a marked sound this implies that he/she should be able to produce a more unmarked/natural speech sound BUT NOT VICE VERSA

21
Q

natural phonology

A

this theory explains the patterns of speech are governed by an innate, universal set of phonological processes

all children are born with the capacity to use the same system of phonological processes

22
Q

trajectory of phonological processes (Stampe 1969)

A
  1. limitation- the child may choose to use a more natural/unmarked sound for a more marked one
  2. ordering- the child is trying to revise their productions to be closer to the adult-like form
  3. suppression- abolishment of previously used phonological processes
23
Q

syllable structure processes

A

address the general tendency of young children to reduce words to basic CV structures

24
Q

substitution processes

A

when one speech sound is substituted for another

25
Q

assimilation processes

A

when one speech sound influences another

26
Q

case history

A

general info (age, name, home address, etc.)

parent interview (who lives at home w child, who spends most time w, etc)

ask parents specific questions regarding (prenatal and medical history)

27
Q

hearing screening

A

pure tone audiometry
- pure tones presented to each ear at abt 20 dB for diff frequencies)

history of middle ear infections

28
Q

diadochokinetic rate

A

tests the speed of the movement of the articulators

provides info about motor and speech planning

29
Q

advantages of speech assessment

A

-easy to administer
- results provide quantifiable list of incorrect sound productions
- norm-referenced (comparison to peers in same socioeconomic status, age, etc).

30
Q

disadvantages of speech assessment

A
  • sound productions-in selected, isolated words
  • examine a very small portion of a person’s articulatory behavior
  • you CAN’T derive goals from standards score alone
31
Q

what info do standard scores provide?

A

if a child qualifies for services or not

32
Q

stimulability testing

A

tests in the child can produce the sound given support

higher stimulability is correlated with rapid therapeutic success

33
Q

additional measures

A
  • spontaneous speech sample
  • language screening
  • phonological and phonemic awareness screening
  • measure of intelligibility
34
Q

measures of intelligibility

A

2yrs- 50% intelligible
3yrs- 75% intelligible
4yrs- 100% intelligible

35
Q

percentage of consonant correct (pcc)

A

number of correct consonants/number of correct plus incorrect consonants x100

severity
-mild- 85-90%
-mild to moderate-65 to 84.9%
- moderate-severe=50-64.9%
-severe <50%

36
Q

proportion of whole-word correctness

A

number of correct words/ total number of words

37
Q

why are standardized scores not enough?

A

it doesn’t give analysis of tx needed

sometimes a child performs well but your observations identify for tx

38
Q

looking beyond the standard score

A

phonetic inventory- all sounds/phones child can produce independently and what phones they are missing

phonotactic constraints- placement/distribution of phonemes (initial, medial, final position)

phonemic inventory- meaning of words (if they can differentiate)

phonological process analysis

39
Q

prevocalic consonants

A

consonants that occur before a vowel

40
Q

postvocalic consonants

A

consonants that occur after a vowel

41
Q

intervocalic consonants

A

consonants that occur between two vowels

42
Q

what could 2 or more phonemes represented by the same sound production indicate?

A

indicate that the contrastive phonemic function may not have been realized