Quiz 2 Flashcards
Classical political economy
- individuals are rational (self-interest)
- economies tend to operate at full capacity
- markets and price system as allocators of resources (relative prices)
- long-term economic growth
- A. Smith, J. B-. Say, D. Ricardo, T. Malthus
Currency vs Banking school time period
1825-1844
Currency school key players
Lord Overstone
Robert Torrens
George Warde Norman
Banking school key players
John Fullarton
Thomas Tooke
John Stuart Mill
Bullionists
- currency school
- Quantity theory and price specie flow
Antibullionists
- Banking School
- Law of reflux and real bills doctrine
Quantity theory
In its simplest form, it states that if the amount of money in circulation increases, while everything else remains constant, then prices will rise. Conversely, if the money supply decreases, prices will fall.
- Proportionality: prices vary in proportion to changes in quantity of money
- Causality: money supply causes change in price level, not vice versa
- neutrality: changes in money supply do not lead to changes in real economic variables
- Price level: only changes in money supply cause disturbances in price level (in long run)
- exogeneity: money supply is fixed
Price-Specie Flow: X>Y
inflow of gold–>inflation–>Y>X (domestic goods relatively more expensive)–> X=Y
Price-Specie Flow: Y>X
outflow of gold–>deflation–>X>Y (domestic goods relatively cheaper) –> X=Y
Long run price-specie flow
- automatic self-correction of BoT
- quantity of gold ( and circulating medium) determined by needs of circulation
Real Bills Doctrine
Paper money overissue is impossible as long as banks make loans representing claims to real goods in the production process, and will not cause inflation.
Law of Reflux
Excess notes would return to banks
Real Bills Doctrine and Law of Reflux
Not the same, but both challenge the validity of transmission mechanism propounded by quantity theory
Currency school arguments
- based on price-specie flow, any outflow or inflow of gold (species) resulted in a corresponding decrease or increase in quantity of currency
- gold needs to match amount of paper currency, amount of money in circulation needed to match amount of gold reserves
Banking school arguments
- besides gold and paper money, things like bank deposits and bills of exchange should also be considered part of the currency. These operated in the economy similarly to banknotes and gold coins.
-changes in the amount of gold hoarded might not always lead to changes in the amount of currency in circulation. - limiting the amount of banknotes in circulation wouldn’t be enough to ensure that the amount of currency matched the country’s gold reserves. They argued that controlling the hoarding of gold and the amount of deposits in banks was also necessary to achieve this balance.
Currency school policy
- rules-based approach based upon QTM. Stability raised from currency principle
- mixed currency should be made to operate as would purely metallic currency i. e.
making sure every issue of banknotes is 100% backed by gold for currency to keep
its value
Banking school policy
- discretionary approach through law of reflux. Stability arises from Banking principle
- control of deposits and regulation of note issue were impossible and undesirable. Amount of paper money in circulation adequately controlled by competitive banking, and under convertibility, could not exceed needs of business for long time. So long as there is confidence for acceptability of banknotes, market will operate smoothly.
Conclusion of Banking vs Currency school debate
- Currency school won the DEBATE (1844 Peel’s Act)
- gave exclusive note-issuing powers to BoE i.e., monopoly over issuance of notes
– banknotes issue 100% backed by gold reserves to avoid inflation
– separation between banking department and issue department (in charge of convertibility between gold and banknotes)
– Failed to guarantee stability given that in 1857 and 1866 convertibility was halted to prevent exhaustion of BoE gold reserves - monetarism derives from currency school
why banking school won ARGUMENT
money supply is endogenous
– Credit is demand constrained - if there are no borrowers, banks do not lend
– Anyone can issue monetary or credit instrument, problem is getting it accepted
– Instruments which are not money at some particular moment could be so at some other moment
– Banking school approach to credit creation is how financial system operates
Fed uses its control of money to…
…influence expansion of credit
Feds job is to balance:
elasticity and discipline in the monetary system as a way of controlling flow of credit
Lender of last resort
In banking, LLR is a role usually taken on by the central bank during times of panic in the fractional reserve banking system. Its job is to reassure people by promising to provide whatever money is needed to prevent a crisis, either by letting banks borrow easily (with a high-interest rate) or by injecting money into the system through asset purchases.
Thronton’s View
BoE’s responsibility in time of panic is to serve as LLR, providing liquidity to market and discounting freely paper of all solvent banks …
* but denying aid to insolvent banks no matter how large or important
Bagehot’s view
LLR consists of four principles:
* Lend, but at a penalty rate: “Very large loans at very high rates are the best remedy for the worst malady of the money market when a foreign drain is added to a domestic drain.” (Bagehot 1873)
* Make clear in advance BoE’s readiness to lend freely
* Accommodate anyone with good collateral
* Prevent illiquid but solvent banks from failing