quiz 11 us/brazil Flashcards

1
Q

How would you define the presidential regime?

A

Democratic form of government where HoS= President
both parliament and PR elected by universal suffrage
Coalition between PP in the government takes place before PR elections to prevent gridlock, ensure majority
PR dismissed only upon criminal charges
Strict separation of power: exec and legis are independent → PR can’t dissolve LH to provoke new elections / parliament can’t vote out members of gov.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What influences of Locke, Hobbes, and Montesquieu may be seen in the US Declaration of Independence?

A

a. Locke: Inalienable rights (Life, Liberty, PoH), originally property =/= Thomas Jefferson (Rich man’s country)
b. Hobbes: government derives legitimacy from the consent of the governed. Once colonies aren’t represented in HoC = no power to tax
c. Montesquieu: right to alter/abolish government from “long train of abuses and usurpation”
d. Locke and Hobbes, Security: Gov. responsible for ensuring security in their territory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What 3 compromises enabled the adoption of the Federal Constitution, transforming the Confederation of the 13 colonies into a federation w TWO clear legal orders?

A

a. The Great Compromise: HoRepresentatives = proportional // Senate = equal despite population /VA vs NJ/
b. ⅗ Compromise: Every 3 out of 5 slaves would be counted. /South vs North representation/ - slave import outlawed by 1808
c. Commerce Compromise: permits Congress to tax imports =/= exports

North wanted federal control over trade = protectionists policy
South didn’t bc they didn’t want tobacco, rice, cotton ⇒ economy relied on this

Representation in the UH, LH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Does the fact that the US constitution was based on compromise influence the provisions on constitutional amendment?

A

YES. Rigid Amendment Process: bc the compromises were so fought hard for → rigid → no small faction can alter constitution without overarching consensus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Did the FC include a bill of rights in 1787?

Were rights not guaranteed in the early US Republic?

A

No. Guaranteed by each state, not on federal level. → could limit rights of people bc : the rights not included in Bill of Rights could be seen as not guaranteed

Rights were guaranteed.
Article I, Section 9: writ of habeas corpus
state constitutions
structure of government/ SoP: prevent any branch to infringe on individual rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is the US a semi-direct democracy at the federal level?

A

NO, it’s a representative democracy because
lack of legislative initiative, referendum, or recall
only participate through elections – indirect election of president through electoral college
=/= primary elections through caucuses and conventions let voters directly choose own candidates

NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

. Why does the actual number of federated States in the Brazilian Federation show the continuity of the structure of representation in Brazil? How many States? What were these regions called before the creation of the Federation in 1891?

How does the government of the old structure (before 1891) illustrate the actual functioning of the Brazilian Federation?

A

26 states and 1 federal district =27 entities in the federation → relatively autonomous in terms of education, health, taxation
→ 1889: monarchy to republic ⇒ provinces were restructured to have greater autonomy but territory remained the same
→ 1891: federalization by constitution → 22 provinces IDENTICAL ⇒ number and way they function is direct continuation

originates from deconcentrated unitary state the Brazilian Federation is CENTRALISED compared to other federations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

. What is the difference between the formation of US federalism and Brazilian federalism?

A

a. US = allocation. 13 different colonies came together through the Articles of Confederation → Federal state with Federal Constitution

b. Brazil = dislocation. 1891 constitution after a military coup d’etat. Deconcentrated unitary to a federalized.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What article of the US Constitution provides that Federal law always prevails over federated state law?

Name one case in which the SCOTUS confirms that federated States have power to act as long as they are not denied such power by the Constitution, federal law, or by their own federated constitution.

What Amendment of the US constitution explicitly affirms this “delegated power” principle?

A

Supremacy clause, Article 6, par. 2 : US Federal Law takes precedence over state laws and state constitutions.

McCulloch v Maryland: Maryland attempted to tax a branch of Second Bank of the US = unconstitutional

The 10th Amendment: states have the power to act unless denied such power by a constitution or a federal law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What amendment of the US Constitution explicitly limits federated states powers to legislate in certain areas concerning human rights? What are these areas? In one of these areas, the federal law is also limited by the 5th amendment. What is the case of the US Supreme Court which holds that federal law may not treat same-sex marriages differently than heterosexual marriages? In what case was this holding generalized, and therefore applicable to federated states?

A

14th Amendment limits the power of the federated states
a. Depriving a person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law (Due Process Clause)
b. Denying any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

Areas limited by 14th amendment: Discrimination, voting rights, marriage rights, access to justice

The Due Process Clause of the 5th amendment also ensures life, liberty, property. Parallel protection at both state and federal levels.

US v Windsor. Federal law cannot treat same sex marriage differently

Obergefell v Hodges. Nationwide recognition/legalization of same sex marriage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

. What article grants enumerated powers to the Federal Congress?

On top of said enumerated powers, what case of the SCOTUS held for the first time that the powers granted to Congress were not only those that were enumerated but also those that are implied?

A

Article I, Section 8

McCulloch v Maryland
1. Congress had the authority to establish the bank under the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18), which allows Congress to make all laws necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers.
2. Maryland could not tax the federal bank because of the Supremacy Clause (Article VI), which establishes that federal law is supreme over state law.

Significance:
This decision established the doctrine of implied powers, allowing Congress to take actions not specifically enumerated in the Constitution if they are necessary to fulfill its enumerated powers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Name two enumerated and two implied powers granted to the US Congress.

A

Enumerated:
Power to Tax (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1)
Power to regulate commerce (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3)

Implied: Derived from Elastic Clause
Power to establish a national bank
Power to draft citizens into military
Power to control immigration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

. In what case did the SCOTUS consider that article I section 8 US grants Congress the power to regulate commerce between the federated states including navigation on state rivers and any other activity touching even indirectly commercial activities?

A

Gibbons v Ogden.
2 steamboat operators
Ogden had monopoly license granted by state of NY, Gibbons had federal license
Gibbons» Commerce Clause gives precedence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the names of the cases and what is the test that determines whether or not the Federal State may take legislation that applies to the federated states without violating the Xth amendment?

A

-The 10th amendment shields federal interference in core functions. “Traditional Government Function” test to determine if federal functions unconstitutionally intrude on state sovereignty. [National League of Cities v Usery 1976]

Abandoned TGF in Garcia v San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority. New test: Anti Commandeering principle → Test confirmed in 2012: National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius
ACA→ federal government cannot force states to implement federal programs // Congress through mechanisms such as funding, tax, within the scope of enumerated powers

BALANCING TEST - Arizona

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In the presidential regime of the US, may the president adopt autonomous decrees without a constitutional basis?

What article of the Constitution contains the rule on this question, and what is the leading case of the SCOTUS?

A

NO. The President’s authority to issue executive orders derive from the Constitution or a power delegated by Congress through legislation.

Article II, Section 1 and 3 vests executive power in the President and directs the president to “take care that the laws are faithfully executed”

Leading Case: Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952)

Korean War, Truman → steel production for war effort → lacked congressional/constitutional authorization.

Evaluating presidential power:
a. Maximum power
b. Twilight Zone
c. Lowest Ebb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Since one of the checks on the power of the US President is the possibility of impeachment, may the President also be tried for acts incumbent to his functions? What is the leading case of the SCOTUS on this question?

A

Impeachment: Article 2, Section 4. /Treason, Bribery, other High Crimes and Misdemeanor/ → removal from office not criminal penalty
Criminal Trial: Nixon v Fitzgerald (1982)

DOJ: sitting president immune from criminal prosecution but after leaving office
United States v Nixon (1974): president is NOT above the LAW, reinforce the idea of post presidency prosecution

US vs Trump 2024: granted more specific immunity (jan 6 wasnt governmental function) –SPECIFIED levels of immunity
no more legal immunity but still immune to his governmental functions
during his presidency, procedures are suspended (but civil proceedings)
did not modify Nixon v Fitzgerald.

17
Q

May the President of the US initiate legislation?

May the President block legislation voted by Congress? If so, is there any way Congress may push legislation through in spite of presidential refusal?

May the President block only part of a law? What SCOTUS decision rules on this point?

A

No. Legislative powers are granted to Congress by the Constitution. PR can propose, influence.

Yes, PR can veto. (Article 1, Section 7)
- 10 days to allow/veto/sign into law
- pocket veto

Yes, Congress can override veto if they claim ⅔ majority in the House of Representatives and Senate.

No line-item veto (part of a law cannot be vetoed). Clinton v City of New York (1996)–> to be looked up
unconstitutional lawmaking
LINE ITEM VETO ALLOWED IN BRAZIL

18
Q

Term Lengths

A

US Representatives: 2 YEARS

Senators: 6 YEARS → elections : ⅓ of Senate is up for elections every 2 years

President: 4 YEARS

19
Q

How do Staggered Elections create an automatic dissolution mechanism creating cohabitation of Republicans and Democrats after nearly every midterm election?

A

Different branches of government are elected on different cycles

Staggered elections → changes to the political composition of Congress (balance of political powers between parties)

Midterm elections as a check, presidents performance and policies

Cohabitation: different parties for PR and Congress → checks and balances
i.2018 Midterms. Trump. Republicans lost House to Democrats while controlling Senate

FPTP de facto two party prevalence →

20
Q

. In the US presidential system, are financial contributions by corporations to electoral campaigns unlimited? What did the SCOTUS rule on this question?

A

YES UNLIMITED
seen as campaign financing = freedom of expression

Citizens United (free speech protection) v. Federal Election Commission (2010)
→ 1st Amendment prohibits restrictions on independent expenditures by corporations for political campaigns.
Super PACs : corporations can donate unlimited amounts to PACs leading to indirect influence on elections.

21
Q

What is gerrymandering? How does the SCOTUS limit gerrymandering in the Baker v Carr case?

A

Manipulating boundaries of electoral districts to benefit a political party OR race?
not justiciable→ since they draft their own electoral procedure, it is NOT REVIEWABLE IF IT IS BASED ON POLITICS BUT IT IS IF IT IS BASED ON RACE (against 14th amendment)
a. Packing: concentrating opposition to reduce influence
b. Cracking: splitting opposition voters to dilute influence

Baker v Carr: Gerrymandering is allowed unless its racial.

22
Q

What are the particularities of the Brazilian Federal District and the municipalities even though they are not federated States? What would Thomas Jefferson have called this innovation?

A

Distrito Federal = power of state AND municipality
→ FD has its own legislative chamber

Municipalities
1988 constitution recognized them as autonomous entities.
legislate on local matters, levy taxes, manage budgets
mayor/city council

Thomas Jeffereson <3 decentralized authority → “ward republic”

23
Q

What is a filibuster? May representatives filibuster in the House of Representatives? The Senate?

A

Way to delay/block legislative action by prolonging debate, until they have a supermajority of 60 votes.
need for filibuster = condemned as no longer necessary, exacerbated countermajoritarian blockages.

senate = UH, countermajoritarian ⇒ MORE countermajoritarian

not possible in House of Representatives, in the rules of procedure in the senate

24
Q

How is judicial review (constitutional review) accomplished in the United States? What is the case that develops the method and the limits to judicial review in the United States? (what courts review? What do they review? When?)

A

All courts, esp SCOTUS can JR.

What?

Legislation: Federal and state laws.
Executive Actions: Orders and decisions by the president or governors.
Regulations: Administrative rules and agency decisions.
State Actions: Policies or laws that potentially violate the federal Constitution.

Judicial review is reactive, not proactive. Courts do not initiate reviews but decide cases where constitutional issues are raised.

Marbury v Madison established the principle for judicial review.

25
Q

How does the U.S. Supreme Court interpret the first amendment of the U.S. constitution’s governmental obligation of neutrality in the face of religious expression? What is the level of judicial scrutiny of governmental neutrality in the 2022 Bremerton case? Does this contradict the spirit of the Court’s ruling in the Holt v. Hobbs case?

A

the 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of religion through free exercise, free speech clauses. → require government neutrality

2022 Kennedy v Bremerton STRICT SCRUTINY
high school football
not government endorsed, private prayer

  • new standard: violating the neutrality for freedom of expression if its history and culture of the US

2015 Holt v Hobbs STRICT SCRUTINY
muslim inmate, growing beard prison policy
→ accomodation unless theres a compelling government interest

26
Q

What is/are the common particularity(ies) of judicial review in Brazil, Germany, and Spain?

A

Constitutional Supremacy: All prioritize their constitutions as the highest law.

Specialized Courts: Use specific courts for constitutional review (e.g., Brazil’s STF, Germany’s Bundesverfassungsgericht, Spain’s Tribunal Constitutional).

Abstract Review: Allow courts to assess laws’ constitutionality without a specific case (binding decisions).